User talk:MyNameIsNotBob/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Restorationism
Thank you for calling attention to the copy problems in the article, Restorationism. Since the notice was posted, a number of Wikipedians have helped to clean up the English, and re-work the presentation. Would you support removing the notice, now? Mkmcconn (Talk) 22:29, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- You will find, if you look through the history that it was not me that placed the copyedit notice on the main page. MyNameIsNotBob 01:28, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
WikiProject SDA Church
Dear not-Bob, thanks for noting my interest in the Adventist Church. I went ahead and joined the project, but my actual participation may not be very frequent or extensive, as I am an extremely busy teacher and this is my first year out of college. However, I wish you the best of luck, and will try to participate when I have the time. Sincerely, Cromwellt | Talk 22:47, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for dropping me a note, Not-Bob. I'll see what I can do for that section (Outsider Criticism) in the next few days. Cromwellt | Talk 20:21, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello
You told me to do this i hope im doing it right.
Thanks for the 3rd POV
Thanks for providing an outside viewpoint on Talk:KTVX. It got one of the two parties involved to actualy talk about the situation. A 07:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
KTVX
You have received this message because you have edited a Salt Lake City media article in the past. We have recently had an edit war regarding the wording and inclusion of a paragraph on the KTVX article. In hopes of resolving this I have put together an informal survey. If you are interested, please stop by Talk:KTVX and add a vote. Thanks, A 09:09, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Took note, and i just consider it a rewored lengenthed version of the first one which still does not address the simple thing. What merits KLS being mentioned over the other stations that also aired the comerical, becides the fact that it owned by an subsidary of the LDS. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 09:41, 7 December 2005 (UTC)