Myxiao

The original page of organic electronics is systematically written, including history, features and couple organic electronic devices. However, it gives a superficial touch on major topics like organic light emitting diode(OLED), organic field-effect transistor(OFET) and possibly organic photovoltaic devices. Besides, devices this site illustrated have no detail information about its organic structure, nor polymer structure. Following are couple ways we can improve this site:

1. Give a in-depth look on major topics like OLED, OFET, etc.

2. Incorporating chemical structures, as well as its polymer structure;

3. Illustrating couple synthetic schemes on some milestone structures discovered in this field;

4. Introducing major progresses made along with more pictures to help readers to understand.

Timeline:

Feb 14th: Finish sandbox version.

March 14th: Wikisite go live. Myxiao (talk) 04:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Your page provide much more unique and update information about organic electronics compared with the existing one. The introduction part in quiet understandable for the nonprofessional people but there are some grammar mistakes for the definition: Organic electronics is a field of material science concerning small molecules or polymers that has electrical property, or small molecules or polymers that shows conductivity, where “has” and “shows” probably should be corrected to be “have” and “show”. The same kind of the mistakes also appear in other parts. Additionally, it will be better if you can rewrite the sentence of “ Besides, people also …” in your introduction part since I did not find any parallel relations between this sentence and the first sentence and people deservedly take your second sentence as a part of the definition if you use “besides” but apparently it is not. Other than these, your introduction does present a general picture of the organic electronics. The content part of your page is pretty informative and well organized. The history is very comprehensive. All sections have a justified length. Your job to link the important terms/concepts to the respective Wikipedia pages makes your article very easily to read for non-experts. At the same time, I noticed you persistently do this work for most of the terms/concepts, but some terms/concepts such as Ching W. Tang, OLED, film which also should be linked as their first appearance. Mover over, some concepts, for instance, poly(p-phenylene vinylene), condensation can be linked to their Wikipedia page, respectively. For some terms that have no existing Wikipedia pages such as Poly(3-alkythiophenes) and Br6A, it will be a good idea if you can provide any external resources to demonstrate them. Your highlighted examples are appropriate and help your sketch of the whole picture very well. Your original pictures and figures are very informative and of high quality. Your Chemdaw structures and the scheme of the bilayer OLED are very impressive and informative. But I am not sure whether the pictures of Br6A and red power Rubrene-OFET are your own work. If no, I suggest you ask for the permission for the authors. Your references include non-journal sources and are absolutely complete. Overall, you did a fabulous job. Your page is very updated, informative and comprehensive. What you need to do for improvement of your revision is correcting grammar mistakes and linked some important terms/concepts as I talked above to the appropriate resources. For each of the application, if you can give people one or more examples of the specific polymers and their structure information, that will be perfect. I find one paper from Sigma-Aldrich. It provides many organic electronics polymer structure information. Hope it can help for your revision.

http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/materials-science/material-matters/material_matters_v2n3.pdf

Wjunqi (talk) 03:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Organic electronics may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], he produced a partly [[conductive]] [[material]], that was later identified as [polyaniline]]. In the 1950s, the phenomenon that [[polycyclic]] [[aromatic]] [[compounds]] formed semi-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Organic electronics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Band, Charge, Compound, Compounds, Conjugate, Deposition, Dispersion, Electronic, Emission, Measure, Orbital, Stability, Backbone, Carrier, Channel, Interface, Layer, Domain, Rod, Organic, Sublimation, TFT, Substrate, Substitution, Source, Current, Pathway, Device, Plate, Drain, Mechanical, Complex, Formation, Insulating, Polycyclic, Material and Insulator

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)