N1of2

Hello, N1of2. Are you new to Wikipedia, or have you been editing for awhile as an IP editor and are already familiar with Wikipedia's rules and policies? Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

I did occasional edits over the years but nothing intense. Thanks for reaching out; from a quick look I see that your edits and comments are frequently well received. Your usage of "lede" actually made me look it up. :) N1of2 (talk) 18:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Either way, welcome to Wikipedia! I thought to ask because sometimes folks are new and haven't had the chance yet to get familiar with Wikipedia policies; I noticed you'd reverted three times in the past 24 hours on the Obsession article (here, here, and here) and wanted to make sure you didn't get yourself in a spot with WP:3RR, something you'll probably want to read up on since its considered a "bright line" rule. Also, you might want to read WP:BRD, which essentially says that if you come to an article and start making changes and your changes are opposed and reverted by other editors, the best way to proceed is to take the proposed changes to the Talk Page and discuss them first instead of simply flipping the article back to your new style/preference while continuing the discussion. With that said, I don't wish to be leave you a negative impression of working with other editors or discourage you from enjoying your time here on Wikipedia... most of the time here, editors find a way to work it out and get along just fine even if their perspectives differ! Everyone has a right to participate as long as they work within the community, and the process of seeking consensus usually ends with an article finding the middle ground (as it should be). On that note, welcome again and I look forward to working with you! Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 18:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

AC, Thanks for taking the time with your well referenced post above. I will tread more carefully and hope to not waste your time again in this fashion :) N1of2 (talk) 19:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chen Reiss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Spencer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loyd Jowers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Justice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lior, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Israeli and Sidney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

ANI discussion about Wayne Hoffman

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 01:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks A Quest For Knowledge (talk)! Responded, direct link [1] N1of2 (talk) 04:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Fringe sources

Hello N1of2 ,

The fringe http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/ (formely http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/ formely http://www.hudson-ny.org/ ) can be used to source "According to far right gatestoneinstitute.org, Muslims are this and that.", but can not be used to source "Muslims are this and that.". See WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV, WP:FRINGE, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 134#Gatestone Institute and Taybeh, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 142#Quality of sources. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gatestone Institute. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 02:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please read wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. The article should stay in the original state until wp:consensus is reached. Jim1138 (talk) 02:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, N1of2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, N1of2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eva Heyman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 22:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Article sourcing expectations for Polish history during World War II (1933-45)

Hi N1of2, please be aware of the article sourcing expectations for Polish history during World War II (1933-45) set in Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland § Article sourcing expectations. The text is reproduced below:

The sourcing expectations applied to the article Collaboration in German-occupied Poland are expanded and adapted to cover all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Only high quality sources may be used, specifically peer-reviewed scholarly journals, academically focused books by reputable publishers, and/or articles published by reputable institutions. English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones when available and of equal quality and relevance. Editors repeatedly failing to meet this standard may be topic-banned as an arbitration enforcement action.

Your use of IMDb (RSP entry) and Israel Unwired (israelunwired.com) in Special:Diff/947279965 fall short of these expectations. Please take care to use high-quality reliable sources in this topic area. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 13:50, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)