NNtw22
Welcome!
Hello, NNtw22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ·:· Will Beback ·:· 06:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Read the Lawsuit
editIf you read the lawsuit (it's only 13 pages), you will see that the lawsuit has EVERYTHING to do with R. Roberts. Your removal of the material is completely inappropriate, as it is sourced material, and it pertains directly the subject of the article. Your opinion that it does not belong isn't really relevant to whether it ACTUALLY--in point of fact--belongs. Stop removing sourced material.K. Scott Bailey 14:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- I read it three times over the last few days. I don't think two articles should have the exact wording. The material removed, was not in fact, "sourced." NNtw22 05:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Request for mediation
editA request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Kent Hovind, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Daniel 13:16, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Request for Mediation
editIf you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
George Pearsons: Baptist Minister(?)
editI think your addition of the Baptist minister cat for the George Pearsons page may be in error. I doubt EMIC (or for that matter, KCM) have any ties to any Baptist group. If I'm wrong and/or missed something recent that took place; just let me know here. WAVY 10 Fan 13:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Karen Bartelt for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Bartelt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Bartelt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jinkinson talk to me 03:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)