NReTSa
Welcome
editWelcome!
Hello, NReTSa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
♫GoP♫TCN 11:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
I closed this as keep because it was listed under 25 December, but then realised that you had only added it to the MfD listing page today. Though it is clearly going to be a keep, maybe a WP:SNOW keep, I think it should have more time on the actual listing page, so I have un-closed it and moved it up to today's listing. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- It wasn't my error (see [1]) but thanks anyway --NReTSa (talk) 02:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
unblock
edit
NReTSa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't see any reason I should have been blocked - I haven't violated any policy
Decline reason:
You're a confirmed sockpuppet. See the bottom of this investigation for more info. ‑Scottywong| squeal _ 06:30, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
NReTSa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't think the evidence is strong enough to conclusively say that I am a sockpuppet. I edit different articles than Latish redone does. Also, I was not given a fair opportunity to dispute the accusations of sockpuppetry - if you see the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Latish redone/Archive page above, the only thing that happened regarding my account is that "Deltaquad" requested an investigation on me (without giving me any warning whatsoever) as well as conducting the Checkuser himself - shouldn't an uninvolved person be confirming the findings? I don't see why I was suspected of being the same as Latish redone in the first place - he edits different articles and I have never committed vandalism or edit warring or anything that Latish redone was blocked for.
Decline reason:
Checkuser evidence appears not to support your contention.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- To be clear, the CU was initiated at my request, offwiki. Policy doesn't require you be notified, and in fact, often discourages it. There is no "Right" to dispute the evidence. There is no justice, we aren't a court. And now at least four people have viewed the situation, not just one. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 22:39, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- LOL. Grudge reporting just bc I nominated your precious little anti-AGF essay for deletion. Did you request CU on the IP too? No wonder this place sucks, it's full of shit. LOL. I was here to improve WP and I get this shit? --NReTSa (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)