User talk:NYKTNE/Archive 1

Archive 1

Nomination of Special Tactical Squad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Special Tactical Squad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special Tactical Squad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add sources to Special Tactical Squad

Please let me know if you want me to move it to a Draft page for you so it will not be deleted while you are working to add sources. Message me on my Talk page if so. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Obeying the Party, Victory in Battles, Style of Phenomenality

The article Obeying the Party, Victory in Battles, Style of Phenomenality has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no sense of the article in its current form

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:59, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of J.J. McCullough for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J.J. McCullough is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.J. McCullough (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Alastair Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to British

Leigh Turner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to British

Susan le Jeune d'Allegeershecque (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to British

Thorhilda Abbott-Watt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to British

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Stephen Cheung

Hi, I'm Boleyn. NYKTNE, thanks for creating Stephen Cheung!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has beent agged for several concerns.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 12:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Queen's Guard, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trooping the Colour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Changing of the Guard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Zachary Rolfe

Hello, NYKTNE,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Zachary Rolfe should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Rolfe .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

~ Araratic | talk 06:42, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deputy prime minister, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McCormack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NYKTNE. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DUP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nigel Adams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Spencer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Philip Chan

Hello. I see that you have moved Philip Chan (actor) and created a new disambiguation page. Unfortunately, this left about 50 film articles linking to Philip Chan, which is no longer their correct destination. I've tried to fix all resulting mis-directed links, but you may want to check that they are all pointing to the correct articles. Thanks, Certes (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much! NYKTNE (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Stephen Lloyd

It seems that parliament.uk is wrong, as this was tweeted before dissolution: Stephen Lloyd was returned the Lib Dem whip and re-tweeted by Stephen Lloyd. Jim Craigie (talk) 17:58, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Hey there! I was also aware of that tweet at the time, but that tweet was, firstly, unofficial (i.e. made by a page that is only appealing to remainers for tactically voting Lloyd) and secondly, not posted by Lib Dems themselves. I think the reason why Lloyd retweeted was to only show that he was the only remain candidate in that constituency in order to ask voters for returning him as MP. As far as the party of an MP is concerned, I think it is only appropriate to look for officially recognised evidence rather than only a tweet. Cheers! NYKTNE (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

This evening I emailed Alistair Carmichael and he replied that Lloyd's whip "was restored on the day before dissolution" but in response to my question "How should we get the parliament.uk page corrected?" he replied "They won’t change anything now until after the election, I suspect" Jim Craigie (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

It's great that there is an official reply. Thanks for asking! Good night! NYKTNE (talk) 04:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chief Whip, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marcus Jones and Eddie Hughes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Craig Williams (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Barclay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard (link to the general board) regarding Rachel Reeves (link to discussion directly). Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 16:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC) _{DRN Volunteer}

May 2020

Your addition to National People's Congress Decision on Hong Kong national security legislation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Hello and thank you for removing the copyrighted material. I am terribly sorry for making such mistake. At the time I only wanted to reflect as many exact wordings of the bill as possible and I was too careless to be aware of the fact that Xinhua took copyright that seriously. Thank you again and I would be more careful in the future to maintain the standard of Wikipedia, which is a community that I am proud of belonging to. -- NYKTNE _(talk) 15:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia takes copyright seriously. Please don't do it any more, no matter what the source. — Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Sure, I'll keep it mind. To make it clear, may I know if it is not appropriate to quote sources? -- NYKTNE _(talk) 15:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Normally we write Wikipedia articles in our own words rather than by stringing together a bunch of quotations. Excessive non-free content is a violation of our non-free content policy. Please don't use quotations unless absolutely necessary. — Diannaa (talk) 16:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC)