User talk:Nahnah4/Archives/March 2014
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Nahnah4. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Orphaned non-free image File:Speak Now Deluxe.png
Thanks for uploading File:Speak Now Deluxe.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry I'm Late (album)
Instead of deleting the article, do a disambiguation page.
Move request: Walks like Rihanna to Walks Like Rihanna
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Helpppppp! Page Walks like Rihanna, the 'L' is meant to be capital, so it should be moved to Walks Like Rihanna instead. However, the Walks Like Rihanna page already exist, so I can't do anything about it. --Nahnah4 Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! 11:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Done. JohnCD (talk) 11:15, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Peroxide (album)
It is an interesting idea to use (EP) as a disambiguating term, but I'm not sure that the term is easily recognizable to most readers. The other issue here is that a requested move regarding the Nina Nesbitt album just failed in February, one that attempted what you are trying to accomplish. I'm afraid the move cannot be considered uncontroversial, and you'll have to take it back to requested moves to gain consensus there. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Xoloz: Are you trying to say that the readers are stupid? I think it is surely recognizable by the other readers. I may use the {{help me}} template again for requested moves, and I hope it will get it back to Peroxide (album) instead. You see. Because, the Pitbull's EP, Meltdown, has a EP at the back instead of 'album'. So, if it is an EP, people will search for Peroxide EP or Peroxide (EP) instead of Peroxide (album). --Nahnah4 Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! 06:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- I guess we can consider me "stupid", then, because I am one of the readers for whom "EP" is an ambiguous term. :) I do not think it adequately disambiguates any album from any other, especially in this age, when songs are most often encountered as mp3s, rather than EPs. The term is fast on the road to obsolescence. Also, see EP for a full list of the possible things that the abbreviation might mean. As I said, the best course for you -- if you wish to proceed with a move -- is to take the matter to requested moves. There are ongoing discussions there concerning precisely this issue, with respect to other albums/EPs. I'm sure you appreciate that Wikipedia operates by consensus, and that the appropriate action -- in the event of a disagreement such as ours -- is to approach the proper consensus-seeking forum. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Xoloz: Fine, I will use the help me template instead. Anyway, I am a reader too. --Nahnah4 Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! 04:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- I guess we can consider me "stupid", then, because I am one of the readers for whom "EP" is an ambiguous term. :) I do not think it adequately disambiguates any album from any other, especially in this age, when songs are most often encountered as mp3s, rather than EPs. The term is fast on the road to obsolescence. Also, see EP for a full list of the possible things that the abbreviation might mean. As I said, the best course for you -- if you wish to proceed with a move -- is to take the matter to requested moves. There are ongoing discussions there concerning precisely this issue, with respect to other albums/EPs. I'm sure you appreciate that Wikipedia operates by consensus, and that the appropriate action -- in the event of a disagreement such as ours -- is to approach the proper consensus-seeking forum. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Move request: Peroxide (Nina Nesbitt album) to Peroxide (album)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I want to move Peroxide (Nina Nesbitt album) to Peroxide (album), and I have already discussed this with Xoloz. The disambiguation page has an EP named "Peroxide" too, but then that's an EP instead of a studio album, so just thinking.... Don't you think so? --Nahnah4 Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! 04:38, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Nahnah4. A previous move request at Talk:Peroxide (Nina Nesbitt album) concluded (after an admittedly short discussion) that the article should not be moved. The reasoning seemed to be largely based on the fact that the album had not (at the time) been released, and so is now largely moot. However, the prior discussion makes this a potentially contraversial move, so you should still follow the process of requesting a move through the standard channel. Yunshui 雲水 10:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Jesmion
Good to say, that news-paper, audio, radio, text, media, are multimedia, but may be, that wikipedia prefer a constructive articles, yet they expect references, and reference would be from the books, news-papers, and media, because they would like an article of centuries or current articles, and it should be a published story which they can quickly dictate: 41.190.5.101 (talk) 08:56, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Who are you? What'cha doing here? What'cha talking about? --Nahnah4 Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! 08:58, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Editnotice size
Please reduce the text size in User talk:Nahnah4/Editnotice. For me and many other users, "Read the following first" has overlapping lines and doesn't fit on a screen. It makes it difficult to communicate with you. I have to scroll down two pages to reach the edit box. It's also confusing that it ends with an open <big> so text in the edit window becomes big. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:07, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- I followed your instructions and thanks for telling me that. What do you think of the size now? Cheers! --Nahnah4 Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! 09:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- It's still very big but you admit being an attention-seeker and I will accept the size. However, the whole edit notice still has an open <big> at the end. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- @PrimeHunter: Fixed. The open <big> don't cause any effect, though as it is the end. Cheers! --Nahnah4 Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! 08:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. It did have an effect as mentioned above. When your talk page was edited, text after the editnotice was big. It's normal now. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- @PrimeHunter: Okay.
- Thanks. It did have an effect as mentioned above. When your talk page was edited, text after the editnotice was big. It's normal now. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- @PrimeHunter: Fixed. The open <big> don't cause any effect, though as it is the end. Cheers! --Nahnah4 Any thoughts? Pen 'em down here! 08:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- It's still very big but you admit being an attention-seeker and I will accept the size. However, the whole edit notice still has an open <big> at the end. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)