September 2020

edit
 

Hello Nailainya nanios. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nailainya nanios. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nailainya nanios|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS💬 17:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

User:GSS, thank you for your message. I don't have any conflict of interest with the subject of the page. I only created the page because I discovered he meets the notability requirement of English Wikipedia. I also made sure the content sounded neutral in line with wikipedia rules on "Neutral Point of View". Since you wanted me to go through the submission process, that's ok. I am going to be submitting it for vetting. Best regardsNailainya nanios (talk) 19:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Can you please explain why you choose to post this page under Aamir Qutub Ansari‎ and not Aamir Qutub which is the only searchable term on Google? GSS💬 03:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aamir Qutub Ansari (September 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GSS💬 03:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Aamir Qutub Ansari

edit
 

Hello, Nailainya nanios. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aamir Qutub Ansari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ƏXPLICIT 12:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply