Hello, Naldox and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 18:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


Information icon Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jamez42 (talk) 23:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Munro (December 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Naldox! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Ross Munro concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ross Munro, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Francisco Rodríguez

edit

Hi Naldox. Since you are the author of the current picture in the Francisco Rodríguez article, I have to ask if you have any direct relation with the article's subject, in which case I would have to point out the conflict of interest policy, which discourages editors to edit in articles they might have a relation with. Best regards. --Jamez42 (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, James. I don't. I've interviewed the subjects a few times, which is part of my job as a journalist. But that is not -in any regard- a direct relationship. Regards, --Naldox (talk) 18:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ross Munro

edit
 

Hello, Naldox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ross Munro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:32, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Seaspiracy

edit

Hi Naldox. Thanks for your contribution to the Seaspiracy article. FYI, someone has questioned the reliability of Daniel Pauly as a source on the film. You may want to join the discussion here. Thanks! Arcahaeoindris (talk) 15:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Logo El Estímulo.png listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo El Estímulo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:13, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

COI

edit

  Hello, Naldox. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Francisco Rodríguez (economist), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --NoonIcarus (talk) 11:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, NoonIcarus. As I Stated before, I DO NOT HAVE a relationship with Francisco Rodríguez. Not a family connection nor a business relatoinship. My career resumé is public at Linkedin and my media career is public in the several different news outlets I have worked for. You decided, unilaterally, that I do have a connection with the subject, and since January this year, you pledge to stamp a WP:COI under my work. Not with Seaspiracy or Caterina Valentino or my other contributions, but especifically this one. So, I think is time to solve this. Since you cannot succesfully prove something that does not exist, where do we escalate this and solve this? To be honest, I believe Wikipedia editors should have good faith as the starting point, as I discussed with Wikimedia Venezuela on Twitter a few days ago about how to change at least a dozen of honest to god badly written articles, especially in Spanish. I think is a disgrace that veteran Wikipedia editors are only trying to hunt down occasional contributors, responding to I-don't-know-what criteria. So, let's solve this. Where is it? --Naldox (talk) 11:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply