Nanchang17

AfC notification: Draft:Typhoon Haikui (2023) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Typhoon Haikui (2023). Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 03:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Atlantic hurricane season (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paper9oll was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 Atlantic hurricane season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:39, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

It's not even 2024 yet. Why would there even be reliable sources for the 2024 season as of 15 September 2023? Sheesh, really. Nanchang17 (talk) 14:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Why would you even make an article for a future season? WP:CRYSTAL applies. Your comment about it on your user page can be considered as a personal attack which I would strongly urge to cease doing in the future. – The Grid (talk) 18:55, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Nanchang17! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:39, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Qcne (talk) 19:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:2025 Atlantic hurricane season

Draft:2025 Atlantic hurricane season, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2025 Atlantic hurricane season and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:2025 Atlantic hurricane season during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drdpw (talk) 19:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much for helping (i forgot how to delete draft) Nanchang17 (talk) 10:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Replying on talk pages

Hi, Nanchang

I've been watching some of your contributions to talk pages and I would like to remind you to not feel obligated to reply to everyone and remember to provide sources and links. Some of your comments consist of nothing more than "I agree" or yelling about how person is wrong without providing any sources (though I have difficulties with tone sometimes). If you have any questions I'll try my best to help you.

Thanks, ✶Mitch199811✶ 02:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Specifically, I'd like to highlight WP:SHOUT ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]), the number of examples of which is highly excessive. Please refrain from using any emphasis in the formatting of your replies beyond the standard support/oppose/comment prefixes. A lot of your comments are also in the theme of WP:ILIKEIT: such arguments are basically "I have a right to my opinion" and do not carry much, if any, weight when determining consensus. Plus, fiddling with a non-discussion part of my talk page is weird and I can't grasp what you were trying to accomplish there. --Jasper Deng (talk) 02:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Haikui (2023) has been accepted

Typhoon Haikui (2023), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:26, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, although that was not written by me. I just submitted the article, and did quite a few edits on the page and the 2023 Hong Kong rainstorm and floods.

Once again, thank you for accepting this draft.

Nanchang17 (talk) 07:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)