Napierk

--Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 22:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)==Basic Black (CBC Program)==

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Basic Black (CBC Program), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Basic Black. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:08, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Basic Black (CBC Program)

I added a redirect on the lowercase "p" page for you. You could switch it around if you want. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 21:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

User Willisis you don't need a redirect page at all. I linked the two pages. We should delete this page. Go look at the page with the capital P. Why would you want two pages that are exactly the same.

User Willisis can you please stop redirecting. It' unnecessary. When people go to search there are two names coming up. We need to delete one of the pages completely. Please stop redirecting. Please :)

I only redirected it once. The other(s) were not me. I still don't get why you want one deleted. Please explain.--Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 22:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I will show you. just watch :)

Can yo please sign your sig. with the four tildes (~~~~). Also, I think you mean the searchbox on the left when two names pop up. Is it true? If so, It doesn't matter which one you click on it will still bring you to the same page. i.e.: p or P.--Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 22:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't know how to sign my name. I'm use napierk. There is no need to have two pages with the exact same info on it. A redirect page is unnecessary. I guess I'm pretty anal and like things to be perfect. I am an intern from Basic Black assigned to do this. I don't think it's necessary to have two exact things coming up in the search engine. There should just be one Basic Black (CBC Program). Please do not redirect. I already linked Basic Black and Basic Black (CBC Program) together. A redirect page is not needed. Go to Basic Black and see for yourself. Thanx :)

To sign, type ~~~~ or click on the button in the edit box that when you hover your mouse over it, it says "Your Signature with a Time Stamp. Also, the point of a redirect page, is so if you search for an article and accidentally capitalize, don't capitalize, or mispell the article's name, it will automatically go to the right article. If not, the search will come up with no results. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 22:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm going ahead and having the article deleted for you. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 22:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok. That makes a lot more sense now. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 22:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi
I undid your change at Basic Black (CBC Program), since the AfD was already closed. If you want to bring the redirect page to RfD, you can always get your text from the old revision.
And I agree with you that it's a little messy to find both pages when searching for e.g. "Basic Black CBC" - however I don't think that deleting all the spelling or capitalization redirects is the right answer. As it is right now I hardly ever get search results, since the name I type in usually is or redirects me to the page I want. Deleting the spelling and capitalization redirects would mean that I had to go through the search results much more often.
I would say that the search algorithm could be changed so that it doesn't list redirects to a page that is also part of the results (by default at least).
Cheers, Amalthea (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

User:RockMFR

It seems like User:RockMFR wants a redirect. Both cases make sense, and it is out of my hands. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (^Talk!/_Cont.) 23:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Basic Black has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bfacebook\.com' (link(s): http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=11024851209) .

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 19:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Napierk for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Amalthea (talk) 12:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

You and me

Hi
Ok, I really am unsure why you are attacking me now. I tried hard to make you understand the guidelines. I provided one of your unverified facts with a reference, which you yourself were unwilling to do. When we were obviously stuck since you did not once even try to offer a neutral way of explaining the content of Basic Black and only kept reinserting the biased sentence and accused me of racism, I requested an outside opinion on the topic to help us out. And sure enough, three users show up, who all just happen to have created an account eight hours after my request for opinions, just to support you on that dispute and discredit me? Unlikely, I have to say.
Not once have I refused to put any information on that page. Had you just tried to come up with a neutral way of expressing the show's purpose, we could have stopped talking about it right away. User:DoubleBlue, who initially flagged your contribution as conflicted and non-NPOV, had to do that, after I requested outside opinions.

To summarize: You said you wanted to report me? Feel free. As a matter of fact, please do. I am bothering people? Of course. I bother them if they ignore the guidelines set up by the community for creating and contributing to articles, by telling them what needs to be changed, or by flagging them for deletion if they are unappropriate. You lash out at me for "daring to accuse you" of using multiple accounts (which you admitted to), while you keep kalling me a racist? That's laughable.

If you say you didn't create those three accounts - fine. Just *once* do as I say, go to the page I referred you to, and say that you didn't create those accounts, and didn't tell people you know to create accounts to defend your position.

If you're unwilling to contribute to Wikipedia constructively though then I really can't help you.

--Amalthea (talk) 11:23, 8 July 2008 (UTC)