Natahari2005

Welcome!

Hello, Natahari2005, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Luz del Sur may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Natahari2005, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Natahari2005! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Sempra Energy

My main issue is not whether the information is true; if it's true, it can be included (subject to principles on undue weight). It just seems that the headings and article are (were) written more like an editorial with a particular political motivation, rather than a neutral encyclopedia article. (ESkog)^(Talk) 11:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)