Times on Base

edit

I understand you're confused, but let me help you on this. IBB and BB are not separated. When someone is intentionally walked, it counts towards there walk total, and it is not something that is added in separately. I hope this can clear things up, because if you continue edit warring I'll have to ask for assistance for mods in ending this situation. Taffe316 (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

You appear to be right, my bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathanyanks3 (talkcontribs) 20:24, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bermuda Hundred

edit

You seem to believe that I have some agenda regarding this page. That's not correct. What you call "your invective" is longstanding pre-existing page content. I reverted the deletion because I think the content is perfectly appropriate here, and because I thought the deletion edit summaries were neither informative nor sufficient.

I don't feel strongly enough about this to edit-war over it. In the future, though, may I suggest that if another editor undoes your contributions, you discuss the matter, instead of just restoring your preferred version? An edit summary that begins "I don't know what your pursuing here" isn't conducive to collaboration. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mordecai Kurz

edit

  Hello, Nathanyanks3. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Mordecai Kurz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Please note that in accordance to our conflict of interest editing guidelines, I have moved your article to Draft:Mordecai Kurz, as editors with a conflict of interest should not create articles straight onto the mainspace. When you are ready to submit the draft for review by our Articles for Creation reviewers, please do so by adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. Thank you. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mordecai Kurz (November 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nathanyanks3! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply