NativePride98
Welcome!
|
NativePride98, you are invited to the Teahouse
edit
|
Hi NativePride98! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Population history of the indigenous peoples of the Americas
editBefore this is added to the article its first needs sourcing for the data and also needs a major formatting fix. You can work on this right here if you like. Do you have were the info comes from? -- Moxy (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
{{Infobox ethnic group
|group = Pre-Columbian Population areas
|pop = Approximately 74 million
|region1 = {{Arctic|Arctic}}
|pop1 = 300,000 today 200,000
|region2 = {{Sub-Arctic|Sub-Arctic}}
|pop2 = 650,000 today 360,000
|region3 = {{Northwest Coast|Northwest Coast}}
|pop3 = 250,000 today 115,000
|region4 = {{Northeast|Northeast}}
|pop4 = 1,200,000 today 640,000
|region5 = {{Southeast|Southeast}}
|pop5 = 1,400,000 today 800,000
|region6 = {{North East Plateau|Northeast Plateau}}
|pop6 = 300,000 today 115,000 7mill
|region7 = {{Calif-Coast|Calif-Coast}}
| pop7 = 300,000 today 101,000
|region8 = {{Great Plains|Great Plains}}
|pop8 = 600,000 today 360,000
|region9 = {{Great Basin|Great Basin}}
|pop9 = 200,000 today 60,000
|region10 = {{Southwest|Southwest}}
|pop10 = 2,000,000 today 1,248,000
|region11 = {{Mesoamerica|Mesoamerica}}
|pop11 = 24,000,000 today 25,500,000
|region12 = {{Carribean|Carribean}}
|pop12 = 4,000,000 today 65,000
|region13 = {{Central America|Central America}}
|pop13 = 8,000,000 today 4,340,000
|region14 = {{Andes|Andes}}
|pop14 = 18,000,000 today 16,000,000
|region15 = {{Amazon Basin|Amazon Basin}}
|pop15 = 6,000,000 today 500,000
|region16 = {{Brazilian Highlands|Brazilian Highlands}}
|pop16 = 6,000,000 today 560,000
|region17 = {{Gran Chaco|Gran Chaco}}
|pop17 = 400,000 today 127,000
|region18 = {{Southern South America|Southern South America}}
|pop18 = 600,000 today 200,000
}}
Unsourced pops removed
editUse references. This is an encyclopedia, so remember to include references listing websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted if unreferenced or referenced poorly. See: Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information. -- Moxy (talk) 16:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
edit
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Population history of the indigenous peoples of the Americas. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dougweller (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Dougweller i made one unsourced thing and Moxy already gave me info u say it as if i made 2 or more unsourced post PS Native wisdom to you NativePride98 (talk) 22:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's important to source all population numbers. A century old book can't be used for obvious reasons. You need to read WP:RS carefully. Dougweller (talk) 05:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Dougweller what if i made a chart of pre-contact California tribe populations using Alfred L, Kloeber estimates since he did actual research and excavations on that stuff would that be alright?
also Koebers populations statistics NativePride98 (talk) 02:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tarascan state may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |capital = [[Tzintzuntzan (Mesoamerican site)|Tzintzuntzan]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
edit
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nthep (talk) 22:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
- You got some good advice there. I strongly suggest you read WP:AGF as well - there are racist editors on WP, but we aren't among them. Dougweller (talk) 05:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Let get you into the community
editI see your still having some problems - would love you to join us at Wikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas were people can help you get your edits on the right path so they will not be reverted all the time. A WikiProject is a group of contributors who want to work together as a team to improve Wikipedia. -- Moxy (talk) 02:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
There is also
Disambiguation link notification for April 7
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Classification of indigenous peoples of the Americas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Rogue River, Clackamas, Chetco and Kalapuya
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Classifications
editHi NativePride98, thanks for your work on the Indigenous classification articles. The classifications are loosely based on those defined by the Smithsonian, since they are one of the few organizations that have created comprehensive systems for both North and South America.
Of course, the cultural regions aren't set in stone, and it would be possible to create a Great Lakes region independent of the Northeastern Woodlands or a Prairie region independent of the Plains, since those tribes especially tend to get overlooked. Also, it's totally fine if a group spans multiple regions, as the Anishinaabe span several.
I've found NMAI's "Cultural Thesaurus" to be the most easy-to-access online listing of tribes and their classifications. You will probably want to provide citations for your edits and need to provide explanations in the edit summary for any removal of previously cited information. Happy editing! Cheers, -Uyvsdi (talk) 16:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Uyvsdi