NaturalNeil
Check out my youtube account and leave a comment!! http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=NaturalNeil
A tag has been placed on NaturalNeil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:NaturalNeil. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GhostPirate 17:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not remove speedy-delete tags from articles without consultation, as you did at NaturalNeil. If you believe the article should not be deleted, please explain why on its talk page. Thank you for your co-operation. Walton monarchist89 17:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GhostPirate 17:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GhostPirate 17:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)