Naveen Reddy

Naveen Reddy's talkpage

We're so glad you're here!Pectore^talk 19:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Pectore ! Have a good time !Naveen Reddy 13:46, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Removed speedy on Intertek Consumer Goods

I have removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Intertek Consumer Goods, as alternate names are perfectly legitimate uses for redirects, plus I fail to see how a redirect page can be blatant advertising. If you disagree, you can list this at redirects for discussion. The user who created the article in its pre-redirect state (which was a textbook example of blatant advertising) will soon be blocked as a violation of the username policy. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

@ Hi Kuyabribri, Well I agree wid your point that a redirect can't be an advert, but actually I was tagging the pr-edit article and lost the article and only can see "redirect" after tagging. Naveen Reddy 17:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

== Speedy on Round Are Way (Oasis song) ==y

You tagged Round Are Way (Oasis song) for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A1 (a short article lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article). Clearly, the article is about a song titled "Round Are Way", by the band Oasis. Were you not able to identify that subject from the articles content? Admittedly, the article was too short, but it did not meet the speedy criterion you listed. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

@ HI Wikidan61 Do you think a single line would make an article and Can you justify the purpose ?! (no contempt intended) Naveen Reddy 17:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

No, I don't think a single line would make an article, but it is sufficient to identify the subject of the article. Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion are tightly defined for a reason: so that they are not abused. The article in question (about a song produced by a notable band) may well have been significantly expanded after the initial sentence. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

797e5c23 @Yep I agree. It was 5 days old article I think when I tagged. But would be more cautious not to misuse Wiki privilages in future ! Naveen Reddy 18:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

About the Soka Gakkai page

Hi Naveen. Thank you for your editing at Soka Gakkai page. I think the Talk page behind that article is a good place to have dialogue and arrive to the best possible presentation. While I agree with you basically (that there was lot of redundant entries there) - it is also important that we work together. The history of the page shows constant adding and deletion then adding and deletion etc...I think it is now one of the most balanced forms but I wonder how long. That's why cooperation for the best Wiki-outcome is imporatnt.

I had a second look at what you sent to me, and I do believe that there is a big misunderstanding, Naveen. I am in fact supportive to your position. The editing you thought were biased - in fact were to refute an attack and defamation against the SG. It is a long story of struggle to put the correct information. Please trace up the situation on the Talk page of the Article, if you have time. Regards, Safwan. SafwanZabalawi (talk) 01:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for correcting the hasty deletion and returning the edited page to previous situation. Wikipedia is a wonderful environment.SafwanZabalawi (talk) 04:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

November 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at President of India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 11:12, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

=Hi @Amartyabag Please explain me what's the meaning of "Governal general of HM government" so you think India is still run by Her Majesty ! No I don't think so. In India the post of Governer general was abolished" on January 26 1952 when India become a Republic !! And all those words discriminating our president are derogatory ! Just being a part of commonwealth is different from being a sovereign democratic nation we not like Canada, Australia who still consider The British royal as their head of state nor our President is a subordinate to the British crown !!!

@Amartyabag I only deleted those sentences which are contrary to reality which is India is sovereign nation, whose president is a head of a republic. Where as you can see in the sentences I deleted which describe him as Lord of HM government, head of a dominion of commonwealth ! Which are insane !! I felt they are insulting to our nation !

January 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Andhra Pradesh, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 07:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Vin09. Now I have corrected that and added the content with proper references. Hope this would be fine.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Andhra Pradesh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• CE and succeeded in repulsing them from [[Warangal]].<ref>The History of Andhras, Durga Prasad (http://igmlnet.uohyd.ernet.in:8000/gw_44_5/hi-res/hcu_images/G2.pdf</ref> Today [[Reddy]]s is a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)