Neddp, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Neddp! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

August 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to I Know Him So Well may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • }}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Know Him So Well, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whitney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Whyyawannabringmedown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Keep Holding On (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to I'm With You
When You're Gone (Avril Lavigne song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to I'm With You

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Record reviews

edit

Please stop adding verbatim record reviews, with poorly formatted citations. If necessary, you should simply provided a properly formatted link to the review, rather than repeating it in the article. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for replying. Sorry if I sounded a little harsh - I'd just seen this edit, where you added a review about Cher's version of "Hey Joe" - a song that has been recorded by a very great many musicians - to the article lead, without any explanation; and used a bare URL in the reference, which you shouldn't do. So, lesson 1 is to make sure that, if you need to add a review, you add it to the right section of the article; and lesson 2 is to use a proper citation style, rather than using bare URLs. Lesson 3 is to consider whether articles actually need verbatim copies of song reviews to the extent that you seem to be suggesting. You could, for instance, simply provide a link to the review in the infobox, without copying the text itself into the article. Sometimes it may be appropriate, but often it isn't. Look at other articles about songs, and see how often copy-and-pasted reviews are included - usually, not very much if at all. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:32, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
PS: And please remember to sign your messages using four of these: ~ Thanks! Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to I Hope You Find It may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 2857183/ Review by USA Today] Retrieved October 15 2013</ref> Philly was also positive "...no less) has the feel of a song that starts over the closing credits of a movie, and features Cher’s too-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/I Love You (Celine Dion song), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Neddp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply