Nehal607X

Welcome!

Hello, Nehal607X, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Taweetham (talk) 13:36, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Week 1: ICCH 224

Please complete online student training at https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training/students You must login and complete all five basic modules. (Wikipedia policies, ..., Finding your article) After completion of these module, we will be able to see that you have edited at least three pages on the English Wikipedia.

Special:Contributions/Nehal607X at this time shows that you have not finished:

• sandbox [1] (N.B. Please do not click "Submit your draft for review!". The function is not applicable to our course.)
• be bold [2]
• talk page tutorial [3]

You need to be logged in on a desktop platform, so that your contributions are recorded under your account. The links above take you straight into the pages where you can launch interactive tutorials. We expect to see you create three new pages during the this training exercise. --Taweetham (talk) 13:36, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Please do not forget to complete the all three tutorials. The deadline is midnight Thursday 3rd May UTC. --Taweetham (talk) 05:43, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Week 2: ICCH224

General instruction

• You are going to see history of pages on Wikipedia to learn how volunteers collaboratively develop content and media. We would like you to learn from the edits made by our students in the past terms. The list of terms, students and articles can be found at user:Taweetham/WEP.
• All tasks must be answered by using Special:Diff. See Help:Diff for further detailed instructions and see an example below
  • Task Read MOS:OVERLINK. Find an example of a student edit AND an edit by other where the link is removed.
  • Example answer Addition: Special:Diff/827688470/827688799 Removal: Special:Diff/827926206/827937829

Tasks

1. Read WP:NOT. Find an example of student edit on an article AND warning message that the student received on his/her talk page.
2. Read Wikipedia:Edit warring. Find an example of student edits on an article (it requires several edits to be an edit warring) AND warning that the student received on his/her talk page.
3. Read WP:COPYVIO. Find an example of a student who has been warned about it on his/her talk page. Find an example (Wikipedia diff on an article) where copyrighted media (image, VDO or sound files) is deleted from Wikimedia Commons and removed from an article.

Please leave your answer below. (Leave a reply in this section of your talkpage.) --Taweetham (talk) 06:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

The deadline is midnight (UTC) Thursday 10th May, 2018 --Taweetham (talk) 06:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

---

Answer for Week 2 homework is as follows:

• Task 1: Student edit on article and warning message.
  • Special:Diff/827338477 The edit warning on the users talk page is as follows: "You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Decantation. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page. If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. I see you have already been warned about adding uncited content and the importance of not edit warring. So don't do those things. DMacks (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC). Please stop your disruptive editing."
  • The talk page of the student is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:U6080140#February_2018
• Task 2: Student edit and warning message.
  • Special:Diff/636834794 The edit warning on the users talk page is as follows: "You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Toxicology. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement."
  • The talk page of the student is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Myat_T._Aung#warning
• Task 3: Copyright warning
  • Special:Diff/827292375 The copyright removal message on the student's talk page is as follows: "Your addition to Water-reactive substances has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder."
  • The talk page of the student is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:U5880650

---

1. All answer should be in Diff format.
2.  Done TASK 1 is acceptable. Add/remove * will not cause that kind of warning.
3.  Done TASK 2 is acceptable. You should show several reverts.
4.  Done TASK 3 is acceptable.

--Taweetham (talk) 03:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Week 3: ICCH 224

A. Proposal

Please propose a topic or two that you wish to write on Wikipedia. You should read all related articles/policies on Wikipedia and provide the following information.

1. Your proposed article(s) (New or existing STUB article relating to a chemical compound, reaction, equipment or technique - or related to your major/interest. (see Category:Stub-Class Chemistry articles))
   • For new article, explain briefly why it passes WP:NOTE.
   • For existing topics, explain briefly the state/structure of the current article.
     • Is the structure & existing content appropriate?
       • If not, restructure or remove content as per WP:MOS and WP:NOT before you move to the next stage.
2. Brief outline of your contributions to the article
   • In what section & what content
     • Make sure it belongs to the article and it is encyclopedic. See WP:NOT for things that should NOT be added.
     • Make sure that it is not redundant to existing articles. Use Google search "site:wikipedia.org" rather than Wikipedia search.
   • References for the article
   • Media files (photo/VDO/drawing) to be used in the article.
     • You may suggest plan to create your own work and upload to Wikimedia Commons
     • You may use existing media on Wikimedia Commons. Use Google image search "site:wikimedia.org" rather than Wikimedia Commons search.
3. Examples/template/related articles that you will use as a model to develop your nominated article.
   • In terms of WP:MOS/formatting - your article will have similar style/format/tone to these articles.
   • In terms of content - your article will link to or will be linked from these articles.

Please leave your answer below. (Leave a reply in this section of your talkpage.)

The deadline is midnight (UTC) Tuesday 15th May, 2018. --Taweetham (talk) 01:23, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia Education Program. Your assignment is not completed by the deadline and we have to move on with a smaller group of students. Your voluntary work on Wikipedia are still welcome but will not be graded. --Taweetham (talk) 00:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposal

Proposed Article: Charles's law This is an existing article.

Structure:

1. Discovery and naming of the law
2. Relation to absolute zero
3. Relation to kinetic theory

The current structure too little and does not mention applications of Charle's law in everyday life.

Outline of Contributions

• I would add another heading with applications of Charle's law in everyday life.
• I would expand on already listed topics if possible.
• I would talk about importance of absolute zero in chemistry and why it is impossible to reach absolute zero with today's technology.

Nehal607X (talk) 04:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

B. Approval

Your topic is approved and added to the course page. Please develop the proposal into the first draft in your sandbox.

• For existing article, you may copy some parts of the existing article to your sandbox to see how revision/integration of content would work. You will copy the code back to the article at later stage.
• For new article, you may want to copy parts of a template article to your sandbox to see what sections are necessary. The sandbox will be moved to the article namespace at later stage. Please do not click "Submit your draft for review!". The function is not applicable to our course.

In all cases, do not copy more than what is necessary. For example, do not copy any categories to your sandbox. --Taweetham (talk) 16:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

The deadline is midnight (UTC) Monday 21st May, 2018. --Taweetham (talk) 10:19, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

This is a reminder that you have not complete the assignment. Please complete it as soon as possible to remain in our program. --Taweetham (talk) 03:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Week 4: ICCH 224 Online editing: Reviewer & Article namespace

A. Reviewer assigned

I've accepted to be your reviewer. I'll in contact with you throughout the assignment. If you have any questions or need any help please let me know. --Athikhun.suw (talk) 09:56, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your preliminary contributions to Charles's law. I see that you're trying to come up with everyday encounters of Charles's law, which is very interesting. It's well written (for now), having encyclopedic tone and providing easy-to-understand pieces of information. I suggest you to add references to your text. Also, I'll leave you to think of any experiments that demonstrate the application of Charles's law. Perhaps we can do it in the lab and take good photographs of it. --Athikhun.suw (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Nehal607X! You have had a period of long inactivity from Wikipedia. If you still want to participate in Wikipedia education program, please make significant changes to your draft asap. --Taweetham (talk) 14:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia Education Program. Your assignment is not completed by the deadline and we have to move on with a smaller group of students. Your voluntary work on Wikipedia are still welcome but will not be graded. --Taweetham (talk) 14:28, 7 July 2018 (UTC)