Man, I hate my username LOL and that YouTube account I closed too, Oh well

Final Days on Wikipedia

edit

  Hello, I'm Emarsee. Your recent edit to the page ZoomerMedia appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Like CHUM Limited, the full name is ZoomerMedia Limited.  █ EMARSEE 23:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continuing to add or change information in articles without sources. Furthermore, despite numerous requests, you've never once discussed these proposed changes. Please note that this is basically your last chance--after your block, please start using sources, please start discussing things with other users when you are reverted, or you will be blocked indefinitely next time. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Qwyrxian (talk) 03:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Neji56565onyoutube (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I really don't know how to add sources. Neji56565onyoutube (talk) 15:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Then you'll need to learn. I can see that many people have left you links to our resources which help you with this topic. You seem to have removed them, over and over again and ignored every warning you've received. It would seem to be a poor idea to unblock you until you can indicate that you have some understanding of our basic policies. Kuru (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you want to contact me add me on Skype mario.mario428 --Neji56565onyoutube (talk) 15:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC) I wonder why I've not been perma-blocked yetReply

Wonder no more ...

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 12:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

jfdkllhklgklgfi

edit

hgjcxftghxfh

September 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Emarsee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Super Channel (Canada), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  █ EMARSEE 00:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Reelz TV Logo 2012.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Reelz TV Logo 2012.jpg, which you've attributed to Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply