Nemzag

Archives 2010 2011 2011-02-18-Ɣéɣ‑ôn‑jʃθë Qrêgwë 2011-03-01-Arbanitês Ãlba‑ani‑tésë 2016-05-03-Syriac ܣܘܪܝܐ‎ Ʃvriac ܫܘܪܝܐ‎

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Nemzag! I am Anonymous101 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Anonymous101 (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

DI‑GAMMA / VAU : Smooth‑breathing & SIGMA / SAN : Rough‑breathing

Hello, from the Ancient‑Greek studies at dis‑tance, that I have per‑formed in Belgium in 2012, the "Smooth‑breathing" and "Rough‑breathing" serves to in‑dicate & marking the ab‑olition of the archaic letter Di‑gamma Ϝ [v] (Smooth) or Sigma/San Σ/Ϻ [ʃ/s] (Rough) in the word, the Ϝ or Σ/Ϻ can be at beginning or middle, it de‑pend of the position of the breathing.

{Di‑gamma Ϝ {also called ϜΑΥ : vau/vaw} is V be‑cause W was Υ/ΟΥ [u/w] from Phoenician 𐤅 [u], Ϝ don't share shape and sound with Υ / 𐤅, after some‑time Υ be‑came later [y] and [i] in Modern‑Greek ; Pamphylian Digamma/Wau/Waw Ͷ is [w], also Ϝ [v] be‑came Latin F [f], V & F are labio‑dental sound and can be con‑fused, when W & F have nothing in com‑mon, so Latin letter F sound [f] come from Ancient‑Greek letter Ϝ sound [v]...}.

• http://www.webtopos.gr/eng/languages/greek/alphabet/earlyletters.htm (Source as V)
• http://www.webtopos.gr/eng/languages/greek/alphabet/upsilon.htm (Source as U, W)
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digamma#Pamphylian_digamma

In the French pre‑cise book of Ancient‑Greek "Le Grand Bailly" or "Abrégé Bailly" breathing (spirit in French) are re‑pre‑sented in the words and in the de‑finition, in [RAC : racine/root] Section is ad‑ded the original word with Di‑gamma Ϝ or Sigma/San Σ/Ϻ. In older editions of "Le Grand Bailly" or "Abrégé Bailly", the "Table of roots" (which is no longer pre‑sent in the new editions) speci‑fies the list of roots using Di‑gamma Ϝ [v] & Sigma/San Σ/Ϻ [ʃ/s], yet in Wikipedia English or French, no one mention that the "Smooth breathing" and "Rough breathing" was used for Di‑gamma Ϝ & Sigma/San Σ/Ϻ removing, why ??? They talk only about a‑spired H (no one can make a‑spired H be‑fore a RHO, it's im‑possible), so it's wrong... Also In Wiktionary page for Ancient‑Greek words using breathing, the W/V or S/SH is never mentioned in "Archaic pro‑nunciation", like for ex‑ample :

• ὙΠΕΡ / HYPER that was originally writed ΣΥΠΕΡ / SHYPER [ʃuper] (Latin : SVPERIOR), or
• ἙΞ / HEX → ΣΕΞ / SHEX [ʃeks] (Latin : Six) or
• ἘΞ / EX → ϜΕΞ / VEX [veks] (Latin : Ex‑) or
• ἘΡΓΟΝ → ϜΕΡΓΟΝ [verg‧on] (English : Work, Dutch : Werk) or
• ἩΛΙΟΣ / HELIOS → ΣΗΛΙΟΣ / SHELIOS [ʃɛli‧os] {Attic} (Latin : Sol, Solis, English : Sun) or
• ἉΛΙΟΣ/ ALIOS → ΣΑΛΙΟΣ / SHALIOS [ʃali‧os] {Dorian} (Latin : Sol, Solis, English : Sun) or
• ΟἸΝΟΣ → ϜΟΙΝΟΣ [vojn‧os] (Latin : VINVM, English : Wine, French : Vin) or
• ἈΡΗΣ / ARES → ͶΑΡΗΣ / WARES [warɛs] (God of War, War God, war it‑self personi‑fied) or
• ῬΕΩ → ΣΡΕΩ [ʃre‧ɔ] (flow) & ῬΕΩ/ἘΡΩ → ϜΡΕΩ/ϜΕΡΩ [vre‧ɔ/ver‧ɔ] (Speak/Verity/Love) or
• ἈΝΑ → ϜΑΝΑ or ΑϜΝΑ [vana / avna].

{I don't use ac‑cent acute / grave in Ancient‑Greek words be‑cause at that time they didn't ex‑ist, also writing Ancient‑Greek word in minuscule is an error, be‑cause at that epoch only capital script with‑out ac‑cent ex‑isted, minuscule should be used only for Modern‑Greek in your Wiktionary or Wikipedia...}. Gmazdên (talk) 12:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi ab‑usive per‑man‑enth block on Wiktionary

Hi Steph‧en,
I have been per‑manently blocked by Vahagn Petrosyan for stupid reason, just be‑cause I ad‑ded some com‑paring terms... Can you help‑me please ??? He even re‑verted Tjetër that Steph‧en al‑lowed me to ad‑d...
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=ruoj&oldid=prev&diff=33173526
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=keq&oldid=prev&diff=33173535
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%CF%83%CF%8D%CE%BD&oldid=prev&diff=33173533
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=der%C3%AB&oldid=prev&diff=33173546
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=tjet%C3%ABr&oldid=prev&diff=33173544
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80&oldid=prev&diff=33173550
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=pavarur&type=revision&diff=33173554&oldid=33088964
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=mir%C3%ABmbr%C3%ABma&type=revision&diff=33173555&oldid=33088797
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=ne&type=revision&diff=33173558&oldid=33085193
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=sahat&type=revision&diff=33173599&oldid=33052232
*https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=rujtar&type=revision&diff=33173577&oldid=33113046
All of tʰem were sourced... And for tjetër I asked to you...

He say that a talk on my page about non‑sense/gibberish, well I ex‑plain how the Semitic / Latin / Qrêgu language is com‑posed and it is some ex‑planation of my research. It is the re‑velation that I had by studying the faith and this is my syn‑thetisation, I plan to make my own data‑base for Gheg & about this, all web‑page are al‑ready done I just need to find a way to MySQL & PHP, be‑cause I don't know no‑thing about...

This guy have a pro‑blem with me I think, I don't know why he act like that...
I think it is be‑cause he is Haya‑stani, and he hate the Ottomans be‑cause they were in war with tʰem, so he don't like me be‑cause I'm an Albanian mu‑slims... Also he e‑rase all com‑paring and co‑gnating vord from the Greek... But he keep Latin (Armanian = Rman Roman), why he doesn't like the Greeks ?

Thank, you can reach me at my e‑mail ad‑dress that you can surely find in pro‑file or con‑tact me at FaceBook Pro‑file that you have surely, or here, help‑ me please... I even blocked my capacity to write PM to others ad‑mins than him and to edit my talk‑page, at least al‑low me to vrite PM to you thank and to talk in Talk‑Page (I have the right to ex‑plain my theory about languages and free‑dom of re‑ligion, though & ex‑pression is a Human Right Article 18 & 19), and al‑low me to edit for my Albanian languages, he e‑rase all con‑tent from me, he is not fair (even those with source, what is this political ???)...

I have made donation to wiki in the past, so I have the right to con‑tribute, as well for my Gheg Albanian languages (even vords from antique,  medieval & Ottoman era), even if some racists dis‑criminators doesn't like that and want to e‑rase our culture by using theories of the Russian Vlatirim Orel (still for Shqipe he also e‑rased the Vetymo‑logy from the book of Vlatirim, so I don't who he is to decide what are the Scipio Shqip‑tar)...  If wiki doesn't want to al‑low the truth about origin of my peoples, it is very bad & sad. Blocking me is use‑less be‑cause I can edit hidden, but it is ridi‑culous be‑cause the time I spend here should be known & my vorks registered for the history... I'm going to con‑tact the U.S & Albanian and Turkish Human Right ad‑ministration & government for the way of ab‑usive censuring of this ad‑ministrator & for not al‑lowing my Gheg languages to ex‑ist in Alter‑native Forms (and I have the source), also Gheg is re‑co‑gnized by U.S.A with the code ALN... 

And I plan to de‑posit a com‑plaint against him to the tribunal of the Albanian, Turkish and Evr‑opean authorities....
ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس مانجزهدي (talk) 10:55, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Vahagn Petrosyan, Stephen G. Brown for reference). Nemzag, you've placed me in a very interesting position. I haven't been responding much lately because I have been out of the country, but I have become increasingly alarmed by the linguistic theories on your talk page. I am very much reminded of the beliefs of Edo Nyland (who thinks all languages are a code made of Basque and executed by the Catholic Church) and of Time Cube. While I initially enjoyed reading your strange ideas, I had become increasingly worried that the incorrectness of your ideas might start escaping into the mainspace. It saddens me to say this, but for the past few days I had been looking for an excuse to ban you because I was worried about the damage you might do to Ancient Greek entries (among others). It's hard enough to get people to believe Proto‑Indo‑European theory without people spreading incorrect information. I'm sorry that I was trying to ban you, but you did provide some bad edits that were excuse enough. Some of the edits you showed above were plausible, I guess, but I can say with great certainty that overall your linguistic ideas are too far from the truth to be allowed.

Your deep belief that you are being persecuted by outside oppressors worries me. We are not trying to oppress you nor limit your free speech. You have the right to say whatever you want (this is true), but you do not have the right to any medium you want. I can spout my belief system till the cows come home, but I do not innately possess the right to talk on the nightly news. I implore you: please do not go around editing anonymously. This will just result in increasingly complex blocks that might affect other users too. Feel free to do whatever you wish, but do not try it on Wiktionary because you are impeding this project more than you are helping it. I apologize for the time you have used here, but I must insist that you stop flooding us with your false, sometime racist belief system.

I feel very bad about having written such a harsh response, but my patience wore out about 3 weeks ago. —JohnC5 10:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

I have not been able to persuade User:Nemzag to accept suggestions that would make it easier to communicate with him and work with him. He wants to add valid information, but there are many problems with his edits, and he does not work well with others. I cannot bring myself to suffer through his annoying hyphenation habit to try to explain anything to him. Besides, he would only ignore any suggestions that I would offer. Now, in his most recent posts protesting his ban, he concludes with threats to complain to the U.S., Albanian, and Turkish Human Rights Administrations and Governments, as well as the tribunals of the Albanian, Turkish, and European authorities. WikiMedia takes a dim view of this, as described in w:Wikipedia:No legal threats. As a result, I don’t feel that I should get involved in this ban. —Stephen ^(Talk) 10:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

I stand by my decision. It may be true that a certain percentage of his contributions may have been correct, but we cannot (and should not have to) rake through his manure to find usable bits. He was given a chance to change his behaviour 7 times, so an indefinite block was the only thing left to do. Nothing personal, I don't have any feelings about Albanians. --Vahag (talk) 11:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

I Steph‧en & JohnC5 thank for re‑sponse, the link that you give ΣΤΕΦ‧ΑΝ‧ΟΣ, say to talk with ad‑mini‑strators first, but Vahagn even blocked my ability to PM or to Talk in my User Page, so, by this action, I don't have any other choice than using the U.N, Evr‑opean, Albanians (Human Rights) & Turkish (I‑slamic) Laws and to con‑tact the Magi‑Strators (& the Magni‑Stator and Hakimi Qadi to), for more com‑petent peoples to de‑cide of this case, I will also con‑tact the US government for the action of Vahagn about not re‑specting the right of the man, and be‑cause he e‑rase alter‑nate forms of Gheg and Co‑gnating terms (this is really un‑just)... I'm sorry Steph‧en, you have done no‑thing to me and I really re‑spect you be‑cause you are a nice & patient guy and you al‑ways taken time to speak and ex‑plain to me things), but still I will use the hyph‑en be‑cause I don't want to vrite like others do, with in‑com‑plet‑ness & neʒative (de‑wil) spelling. Steph‧en, you ad‑d "he don't vork well with other" ??? Why do you say that, I al‑ways dis‑cussed with others editors and re‑spected their choices & opinions, if you speak about wikt:User:Etimo, then I'm not going to agree with his pre‑Ottoman era view of Albanians languages (also he use Cyrillic character for Albanians term and he ad‑d de‑finition that even don't ex‑ist and who are not authentic like in Darkë). We were only three Albanians con‑tributors, I think we can do our job al‑one, why should we vork with other when I can be in‑de‑pend‧ant ? I never done any vandalism or con‑tent e‑rasing, I al‑ways re‑spect others con‑tributions. I only added some Albanian vords & terms or hypo‑thetical vét‧umo‑logy.

JohnC5, I'm very sadden by your saying about finding a reason to find a fake/false reason to ban me.

About the time spended here, my family said to me that it was ridi‑culous and that I was stupid to spend my time here on wiki, ad‑ding for free, with‑out any re‑ward and only re‑probations by peoples using vet‧umo‑logical mani‑pulations from a Super‑Power (Russia) to in‑doctrinate and con‑trol our land, while I could in‑stead vrite a book & a win money with it. (In the beginning I come to wiki be‑cause I needed some terms for linking tʰem to my own web‑page (to help those who read it to be), but be‑cause Wiki was very in‑com‑plete, I ad‑d to make some edit by my own, also wiktionary :
*have no date of ap‑parition of the term (like in Lebailly for Qrêgu for ex‑ample), 
*no photo (archaeo‑logy) or scan of the book were the term was first used,
*wiki use miniscule for Ancient‑Qrêgu (true‑one) while it was vritten originally in CAPITAL, and never used ac‑cent at that time, minus‑cule shoud be used only for modern‑Greek (false‑one), the two are dif‑ferent alpha‑bêθa with totally dif‑ferent phonetic walues, also you use tonos for acute ac‑cent again a falsi‑fication politic...
*missing variant in foreign languages {some term have tʰem like in Saoa},
*no automatic translation like in Ishraêli Babylone)
*Bad spelling de‑tection in search button, when we use for ex‑ample a Qrêgu term, we need to use ac‑cent, while, Wiki should auto‑matically re‑co‑gnize a vords even with‑out the ac‑cent (tonos, spirit) and show re‑sult, searching for ac‑cent variant in "Character Map" take time and spend my little hour here...

I don't think that Albanians & Arbanians are going to do job here any‑more in the future, when we see your con‑duct line (using theory of foreign land than those of Albanian Science In‑stitute), by e‑rasing the alter‑nate or co‑gnating vord be‑cause they are politic & historic ad‑versay (Persian, Turk) of origin state of these re‑versers, these users or Vahagni are doing a Ethno‑cide. And I will not let him do this... That is all. JohnC5 you speak that you are worried about my future edit in Shallê‑nique (ϷΑΛΑΣ = ϷΑΛΙΟΣ or about my edit in Qrêgu (& SYN) I don't see what is the pro‑blem, these are two only I made be‑cause QRÊGU / RÊGS is a term that I needed in my Web‑page, and these are sourced, and for the co‑gnating term CRACK [qrag] (Ex‑cellent, first‑rate, superior, top‑notch ≢ CRACK [graq] : to break) can be com‑pared & Regs Regis and Legs Legis to Qôrona Qanona, it is an opinion, he can re‑vert no need to ban for that, but no Vahag choose to be totalitarian and by doing so I will use the laws of Evr‑opean, Turks & Albanians... I will not ac‑cept that. In pre‑vious discussion, Mglovesfun said "I don't think it's ever been our policy to "only add sourced material". Users are allowed to use their own brains and even sourced etymo‑logies are speculative. If you want to re‑move dubious etymo‑logies, fine, but I don't think we'er going to start re‑moving every etymo‑logy that doesn't have a source.", so I have the right to give my theory & opinion, but even I had source (and gain ac‑cord from Stephansos) Vahag re‑vert in‑formation, so no this is dictator‑ship... 
*Also I made an error by giving you a part of the Codex of the Crown of Qovrana Shupmus Shovranus Shoprana, ancient Thracian Qragu Macedonian Walégs‑Vandr‧os re‑ligion, that the Arabs & Shêmites, Turks and Shalved (slave salvated) share (faith who is the base of their rules and laws in their Kingdoms & Dominions) but you can't com‑pre‑hend it be‑cause of phonetic variation, may‑be you JohnC5 don't merit to be an Eternal Buddha prince who breaked the bad fate (ΜΟΡΟΣ) of Mortality and Death, by entering in to the Nir‑Vana Varana and being uni‑fied with the uni‑verse... Keep using the false Latin Greek Tosk Cath‑olic ܩܬ‑ܘܠ‎ Ortʰo‑dox vari‧anθ for the public, and I will keep the true Qrêgu Laθin Gʰeg (Gegônist Giga Titan) Vorθo‑Dox tʰaqo‑sholic ܬܩ‑ܫܥܠ‎, Al‑Isholima אלישעלים‎ / ܐܠܝܫܥܠܝܡܐ‎ / اليسعليمة‎ per‑fêqθ qoshmic vari‧anθ for me and those who be‑lieve in my book (spirit ספר‎ / ܣܦܪ‎ / سفر‎), every‑body can't be the Vêtsharêng‑Ħêaq‑qanôn‑king of the Otshalvarabumanians (Ruman Albanian, Arbanian, Orbian, Ottoman, Aramaian, Shalvian, Shvrian (Syrian), Aryan Avrian), if I have the keys & the codex there is a reason for...

Good day, I'm going to trip in Maqedonia & in Shqyp‑ni tomorrow and for some‑time, so I will see what I can do there with our justice against the wiki politic about the Gheg (ΤΙΤΑΝ‑ΓΙΓΑ) Albanian mu‑isholims faith & languages (by using anta‑gonist Vlatirim Orel or رمد‎ Bardhyl Demiraj دمر‎ con‑tra‑dictory theories)...

I don't under‑stand why do you say "false, some‑time racist be‑lief sy‑stem.", when this be‑lief is multi‑cultural and his totally humanist & uni‑fying be‑cause all faith are fusionned in only one the Al‑Isholima אלישעלים‎ / ܐܠܝܫܥܠܝܡܐ‎ / اليسعليمة‎‎ (Per‑fect know‑ledge & Peace from God & the Vang'êls). And I love all races & nations who are peace‑full in the aeon‑ionic‑mêlektric‑en‑lightenment. But I don't like the URô → UaR → WaR وأر‎ WoR‑shipper & venerator of Agun Ignis Ogon Agni Vahagn.

Thank any‑way... I was en‑joying Nemzagazmen to helping you on this pro‑ject... And I'm re‑con‑naissant to‑vard Wikipedia and his creator be‑cause I learned many thing there... But some ad‑minus are not good and go beyond & over‑steps my Uni‑versal Human rights... And no I will not ac‑cept that... Good day, take care.

Also he re‑versed my re‑sponse in JohnC5 page and blocked me to be able to talk... ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس مانجزهدي (talk) 13:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Steph‧en can you at least allow me as an user to be able to edit my Wiktionary Talk‑Page and to be able to PM ??? Please... Thank, good day. Nice to met & known you. ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس مانجزهدي (talk) 21:10, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, wikt:User:Kephir has permanently blocked your user page. I’m afraid you went too far when you made the legal threats (see Wikipedia:No legal threats). You have made a lot of people there very angry. I tried to get you to stop putting hyphens everywhere (the hyphens made it impossible to have a discussion with you), and there were so many editing problems (we could not talk about tʰem because of your hyphen fetish). After what has happened, I’m afraid there is nothing that I can do. I suggested that you work at the Albanian Wiktionary. It’s the only thing that I can suggest. —Stephen (talk) 03:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I want to say that I'm not happy that someone erased my profile page, this is not fair, since my contributions here are at 90% correct and that cognating term I added is not wrong... By doing this suppression and trying to dissimulate my work, you truly force me to report my case to the Evropean & Albanian justice. [[User:Nemzag|ΤϷΕΝΑΝΘΕΣΟΣ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / [مانجزهدي] Error: {{Lang}}: invalid parameter: |sc= (help) [طشانانثس] Error: {{Lang}}: invalid parameter: |sc= (help)]] (talk) 4:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do. —CodeCat 17:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, good Steph‧en, thank for re‑sponding, well I ex‑plained why I use hyph‑en in my talk‑page, it is my liberty and I will con‑tinue to use tʰem every‑time in my vriting, be‑cause it is very im‑portant for me to im‑prove the human vriting and in parti‑cular Shqip, Latin and Arabic... It hurt you that some‑one change your mother‑tongue, so what does it feel for me when some‑one re‑move alter‑native forms or com‑paring term from Persian, Hindu or Turkish origin, or ad‑d Russian Israeli fake vet‧umo‑logy, or falsi‑fied your languages like the Tosk with the Gheg...

Now I'm in Shkupi (Macedonia) and I ex‑plained my case to some of my re‑latives who vorks for the ministry of de‑fense and others one, and when I come back to Belgium I will make my com‑plain to the Evr‑opean, U.S, Turkish, Shqiptar (pre‑sident who is a Gheg) and I‑slamic authority (be‑cause Vahag re‑verted "sahat" who ex‑ist in Shqip, he is against Ottoman Turkish Gheg culture, too bad for him (but I com‑pre‑hend they killed 1 millions of Haya‑stanis, but I'm not re‑sponsible of that, and the Slaves, Greeks and Armenians also killed lot of Ottomans عثمان‎ but no one call that a geno‑cide like for the Haya‑stanis (Armenian))...

Steph‧en I know who are my allies, and like the French & Arab say "the friend of my en‑emies is my en‑emy", the Haya‑stan (Vahag), Polish (Kephr) have never been Shqip‑tar allies...

Vahag is harming Gheg I‑slamic culture by re‑moving term and re‑verting alter‑native Gheg forms in Shqip‑tar, and my people and faith is some‑thing very im‑portant for me, by doing that he put me in wrath and now it is personal)... I have vritten a long re‑sponse about wiki politic and Vahag re‑verts, Chuck Entz com‑ment and JohnC5 statement, that I'm gonna put on JohnC5 page...

I will be honest with you Steph‧an, truly I don't care if some peoples are angry (be‑cause of Wikipedia:No legal threats, I don't have other choice be‑cause Vahag also blocked my capabilities to vrite to others ad‑mins so now I'm totally against him and I will use the rights of humans laws against him...), like we say in Shqip "may they burst of rage / ishallah plasin pi inatit"...

I told to tʰem many time to stop to ad‑d fake vet‧umo‑logy from Russian Israeli Com‑munist source (who are not authenticated by Shqip‑tars Science In‑stitute, Com‑munist (under the ideo‑logy of Jewish Karl Marx) who were against im‑perial nobility rule (they killed the Tsar and all his kids) and against the Romans Scipio culture of the Shqip‑tar (Scipio Savior तार), be‑cause they de‑stroyed their temple), but they stubbornly con‑tinues, so now I take it personally, and I will use the Evr‑opean, Shqip, Turkish and I‑slamic Ala laws against tʰem.

The Vahag block for ad‑ding vet‧umo‑logy in Arabic A‑TQN أتقن‎ is false, be‑cause TQN تقن‎ and Techno and Tekno are re‑lated (and since you know Arabic then you can con‑firm, and the "Le grand Bailly" tell that Techno and Teknos are from same root), we also can com‑pare the Syriac meaning of TQN, but all de‑tailed ex‑planations are in my re‑sponse that I will put in JohnC5 page...

And for my ad‑d in Greek Creguos, I only ad‑ded : to com‑pare with Kara and Regs (ΡΗΞ), there is nothing harm‑ful in that... So this bloc is un‑justi‑fied...

Still I ask to you humbly and for the last time, to ac‑cord me to edit my Wiktionary user‑page and talk‑page and to be able to PM to other ad‑mins or users even if Vahag re‑fuse it... Un‑til my block is un‑locked by a steward or by justice de‑cision... Still I would to be able even if I'm blocked to be able to make term re‑quest in Wiktionary even with my blocked ac‑count...

Blocking me is use‑less be‑cause I can do it an‑onymously, and if some ad‑mins block my IP or HWID then it is a privacy violation, be‑cause you ac‑cessing my private in‑formation, and the Evr‑opean Belgian laws don't al‑low it... Also I'm in‑tel‑legent enough to use a VM, and tools to randomly change my IP or HWID, if I want to edit, I will edit, no matter what think Vahag, I don't see why this right ac‑corded to any one in the world, would be re‑fused to me, Uni‑versal rights of human, article 18, 19 and 30 allow me to do that, and no one can go against these rights... Even wiki ad‑mins ! This is why I'm gonna com‑plain to Human Right Evr‑opean court against Vahagn block.

I don't care of wikt:User:Kephir, if you know the Holy Qouranos, you al‑ready know that if he call him‑self a Kafir then he will be judged by God in the other world and in this world for that, and Al‑Ala is very hard in sanctions and punition (H.Q : 59‑4, 8‑13)... Even if he re‑moved my Wiktionary user‑page, the wikimedia one is shown in‑stead, so it is stupid to re‑move the Wiktionary one, I backed up that page and I will put in my own web‑page... My user‑page was locked by Vahag (I can't edit it any‑more), Kephir just e‑rased it...

I don't want to vork on Albanian wiki (be‑cause I hate the Tosks com‑munist standard language), may‑be I will make ad‑d on French Wiktionary...

Also I have my own pro‑ject and web page (but I need to learn mySQL, to finalize the table of Tao that I beginned in 2007 and that I showed to you in parties in my Wiktionary talk‑page, I de‑ciphered the code of the Semitic, Cregu, Latin (French, English, Shqip) Sanskrit and Slavic). I pre‑fer to spend my time on my own page, where no one can re‑verse or ordering me to do what they want, I'm not under their rules, I vork for free on Wiki, for my people, these ad‑mins are not my boss and they don't pay me, so I don't have to follow their de‑sires. In fact, I pay wiki with my donation, so I'm my own boss, but if ad‑mins not al‑low me to edit my wiktionary talk‑page and user‑page and to PM, I will never give money to wiktionary any‑more.

Thank Steph‧an, you are a good one. May God جدد‎ ججد‎ مجد‎ مايجود‎ pro‑tect you. ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس مانجزهدي (talk) 12:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Kephir only deleted your user page, not the talk page. I’m not surprised, since you attracted a lot of attention. Between June 26 and July 3, you made 140 edits on the user page, plus another 560 edits of the talk page during the same time. That is 700 edits in a week. Other users usually make only about 10 edits on their talk pages in a week. When you made 700 edits, everybody was watching and thinking that your actions were extreme and completely unnecessary. Here on Wikipedia, some users do spend a lot of time playing with their user pages, but on Wiktionary, nobody does that. Very little information is permitted on user pages there, other than what is actually needed and useful for the job of writing entries. They do not allow user boxes, detailed biographies, lots of decorations, or any sort of information that is not pertinent to the projects on the wiki.

And of course, there were the constant disputes about such things as Proto-Indo-European. We have discussions in the Beer Parlour on various relevant subjects such as Proto-Indo-European, then we hold a vote, and the results of the discussions and votes become policy. Anyone who edits on the wiki must accept the policies that have been agreed on. If you do not agree with the notion of Proto-Indo-European, you simply have to avoid any kind of edits that are affected by that policy. Instead, you insisted on arguing about it and trying to write material that went against the policies. Wiktionary is not a place where anyone can write anything he likes...everything is strictly guided by previous discussions, votes, and consensus. Wiktionary is a team effort, and it is not permitted to make edits that go against the policies. If you start working at French Wiktionary, it will be the same thing. They have policies that were created by discussions and votes, and anything that you edit there has to agree with their policies and rules. If you edit on French Wiktionary the way you did on English Wiktionary, they will block you. All of the wikis are communities that are based on teamwork, and individual theories and ideas that go against the team are not permitted.

I know that you want to argue about this, as you argue against everything else, but arguing will not bring you good results. Besides, I have already told you that I will not read your messages when they are hyphenated. You have spent a lot of time writing messages to me, but I do not read anything after I see the first hyphen. If you ever decide that you are ready to work as a team, and ready to accept and agree to our policies and rules and what we tell you that you must do, then we might be able to have a discussion. But if you want to argue and disagree about everything, then I do not want to waste any more time on this matter. —Stephen (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

How many edit I do on my own user or talk‑page (that I payed with donation), is not im‑portant, my ideas ap‑pears suddenly so I have to ad‑d tʰem to not forget tʰem... Still you talk about Proto‑Indo‑Evr‑ôpean (Proto‑Albanian) but the Shqip vords re‑verted by Vahag (the fake holy one), were not talking about tʰem, he just e‑rased the Gheg variant, who were sourced and Sahat i‑shlamic term...

I pre‑fer my "Topro‑protho‑Oalvarbumenian" ("Toprotho‧ing" → Otopruntho‧ing → Otshopruntho‧ôj") Shêmanθig Shêmiθik Êshkamnaθ (qèléstial שמיימי‎ / ܫܡܝܢܐ‎ / سماوي‎) binary root theory that teached me my studies (and that the a‑shkali أشكالي‎ nvr نۋر‎ romi ررعمم‎ malok / luks / λύκ مالوك‎ sended to me taught me in‑di‑rectly by singing his strange languages that I seeked to de‑cipher) and that I showed to you in partially, may this in‑crease your know‑ledge and make you better ععدي‎ جعددي‎ ججودي‎ [ggudi goddi oodi] ("im‑prove, a‑meliorate ; re‑new by rumenic (numeric) calculation") : ΗϷΑΝΒΕΓΑΘ‧ƏΜ [ɛʃanbegaθ‧əm] حشأنبهجاث‎ com‑bination of حشن‎ + حشب‎ + حب‎ + حن‎ + نبي‎ + نجا‎ + نبه‎ + بهج‎ + أنث‎ (ἌΝΘΟΣ)...

I'm sorry but some proto‑indo‑evropean in‑vented root are just ir‑rational and not logical (and also neʒative if you base one the code that I ex‑plained to you on my talk‑page) and have nothing com‑mon with the positive [ʒeniə] vord showing tʰem. These root are just sup‑position and speculation. I don't be‑lieve in that theory... And as an Scipio / Shqip, I will not al‑low to use tʰem in my mother‑tongue, do what you want for English words but in Shqip your policies will not be ac‑cepted by NA نا‎ and by UN...

But I re‑cognize that Tsharuhomangathë ("Téprum‧⁠um Truménath Ruomi {روعمي‎ وعيع‎ [wojio]} ≠ رۋع‎ [rvo]} Ruménan {منن‎ Roman Tʰuman Human") are re‑lated to Aryan and Hindi since they vor‑ship the same divinity दिव्यता DEVA देव DEVS / DEUS ΔΙ द्यो / द्यु and some gods are the same than those of Purana... So for the Lathin terms of the Shqip (Scipio Scupi Accipiter Diupiter द्यौष्पितृ) some proto‑indo‑evropean can be ac‑ceptable but only if you use Sanskrit terms not imaginated proto‑one...

Still in re‑sponse that I will put in JohnC5, I ex‑plain every‑thing and that with all your wiki rules, your pro‑ject is be‑coming a jail for e‑mancipated mind, you even re‑fuse to let me vrite how I want with hyp‑en, this is just to much con‑straint and pro‑hibition... (I ad‑ded my re‑sponse to the JohnC5 page but he e‑rased all the dis‑cussion, we can't even seen it in history, the free‑dom and liberty of ex‑pression at his par‑oxysm) 

My block for A‑TQN and Kreguos is not justi‑fied, ad‑mit it. Since I have done nothing wrong, and the article 19 of UNO Right of Human al‑low me to show my ideas, hypo‑thesis in any media, this block is ab‑usive and arbitrary, since 90% of my edit are good... You don't re‑sponded to my re‑quest to be able as logged Wiktionary user to be able to make re‑quest for terms in any languages, or to edit my wiktionary talk‑page...

I will not agree with some of your wiktionary policies be‑cause your rules are against the free‑dom that al‑low the Uni‑versal human rights article 19 (and even if you voted it, the Scipio (Shqip‑tarth) and the Mbret (hided Diupiter im‑perator praetor) were not pre‑sent, like in your vote / de‑cision to re‑place acute ac‑cent with tonos in ancient‑greek, do you asked the Basileus (the Pop) or Qrêgu governement ?)...

The Evr‑opean justice will de‑cide of this case...

You also say to me "to ac‑cept and agree to our policies and rules and what we tell you that you must do" ; Steph‧en, man, I'm "i lir" (free in Scip / Shqip), I never dicted to no one how he should act or be‑have, I do my job for my peoples on Wiki for free, so I will never sub‑mit my self to no one will, be‑cause I'm in‑de‑pendent (and I con‑sider my shêlf as an ascetic زاهد‎ derwish Hakan Shulth‑an A‑Mêliô Mêlik Kamolmi Basilevs Pasha Padi‑Shah Ragja Qrêgu Rêgs Im‑perator Praetor Mu‑Ftahi Div‑piter Ava‑Tar Avto‑qrath Avto‑kepal Tshar Buddʰë بوذا‎) (sur‑pass, out‑do, defeat, beat : by clèmèncy & com‑passion).

I will never ac‑cept the proto‑albanian theory created by the com‑munist Russian Israili Vlatirim Orel ورهل‎, be‑cause his roots are stupid and not logical, and he is vork is based on Tosk (made by the com‑munist) who is a de‑formation of the Gheg, so all is vork is fake and false for me, and it is a vork to ac‑credit this dis‑tortion, since com‑munist Tosk cor‑rupt Lathin, Shemite and Qregu terms...

You talk about team‧ishm against in‑di‑vidual‧ishm, I will say this : you can be all wrong, and may be, only a solitary בּוֹדֵד‎ / أبوددامي‎ singular أوتر‎ [avatar abuddʰami] one can be right, be‑cause you are numerous to be‑lieve in some‑thing false دجال‎ فالس‎ doesn't change nothing, you are not ob‑ligatory in the truth be‑cause you are many... Some of you don't have my know‑ledge for Shqip and I‑shlam and even if I ad‑mit that some of you are better and more in‑tel‑ligent and e‑wolved than me... Even if you say that is a team ef‑fort, wiki is also build by sole in‑di‑vidual... If you are against in‑di‑vidual foreign ideas then what your team do is pro‑paganda for American / Russian / Israeli / Hindi in‑terest, politic and supremacy, and so against Ottoman, Al‑bani אל‎ בני‎ Rumanum רוּם‎ Shqipio, Shemitic, Persian, Turkish and i‑shlam (peace‑full) culture...

I can vork with a team if they re‑spect me and my vork, but if they don't then I will not re‑spect tʰem to... Also some re‑verse are ab‑usive be‑cause it is just less in‑formations, I don't com‑pre‑hend what they are trying to hide (but it seem all link with Persian, Hindi, Turkish or I‑shlamic con‑tent)...

About French or English Wiktionary, if they block me, I will edit an‑onymously, block (black‑sorcery : ΣΕΙΡΑ, سحير‎, ܫܚܰܪ‎, הו‑שחר‎ [sɛħjir]) is use‑less, I will Woqlb‧ən وعقلبيب‎ / ͶΟΛΒ‧ΟΣ with Albaq‑Μag‧⁠a مجوسی‎ / ܡܰܓܝ‑ܣܛܪܝܳܢܐ‎ / מָג‎ אלבני‎ (“lipêrathë → palêrathë حرر‎ حَشْر‎ / ܚܰܪܰܪ‎ ܫܪܐ‎ / ל‑שחרר‎ חרש ‎ & e‑levate علي‎ my pro‑geny in‑tel‑ligence عقل‎ and a‑vare‑ness وعي‎ & rich‑ness with my mind لبيب‎ & heart قلب‎, by beati‑tude and happi‑ness”) by my shêlf, since I'm ΑΡΙ‑ΦΙ عرف ΟΡΦΕ‧⁠ΥΣ ΕΡΙΦΙΟ أرفيع‎ وعل‎ the Wolbooq وعلبقي‎ Wolbooqanuni وعلبقنن‎ {Wolqbi عقب‎ & لقب‎} (“Total en‑cyclo‑pedic skil‑ful & clever لبق‎ Book بقي‎ know‑ledge وعي‎, teaching لقن‎, com‑ment an‑notating علق‎, pleasing & nice عبق‎ pre‑served علب‎ de‑claration con‑structing بنن‎ codi‑fication قنن‎”)...

Good day Steph‧en, and tʰank for feed‑back... ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس مانجزهدي (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	A good and nice admin... ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ (talk) 12:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Nemzag e-mail

Hi Steph‧en, I don't understand what is happening, since today, the fonts of Arabic, is became very small, do you know what is happening ??? Someone changed the CSS profile or what ?
Tʰank, Good day. This e-mail comment from User:Nemzag, 12:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

I don’t know. I assume that you are talking about Wiktionary. My Wiktionary Arabic looks normal. Perhaps the preferred fonts were changed. The font that I see appears to be Tahoma. —Stephen (talk) 18:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

No, I'm not talking about wiktionary but wikipedia page, now all Arabic link using command "script arab" are smaller than before and are near unreadable, on Chrome or Firefox... I think someone changed the Wikipedia CSS... Good day. ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ‑ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / أعليهوسعلۋ‑مانجزهدي (talk) 21:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Also I don't understand something I logged with my account to Wiktionary accidentally (forgot to logout from Wikipedia) some day ago and when I tried to edit my talk page, the page and my IP was not locked immediately like before ??? But the banner is still there and notify that normally I can't edit the page and that I'm blocked indefinitely... So what is the situation actually ? ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ‑ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / أعليهوسعلۋ‑مانجزهدي (talk) 22:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

I don’t know. I do not read or use Arabic on Wikipedia, so I don’t know what they do with it. I only do Arabic on Wiktionary.

I do not understand what you are saying about your Wiktionary page. I can tell you that a banner is just something that an admin places manually on a page. It is not automatic. If your account is unblocked, that would not automatically remove or change a banner. Someone would have to be aware of the change and make the decision to remove or change the banner himself. If your page is unlocked now, I would advise you not to use it. If you start making edits on it, I think someone will notice and block you again. I do not think it will ever be possible for you to edit on Wiktionary unless you change your attitude about cooperation and teamwork versus writing whatever you want.

As an example, I speak Navajo, a Native American language. Navajo is a very complex language, with extremely difficult verbs. I used to add Navajo words, including some partial verb conjugations, and I could add a lot of useful information about Navajo. However, the other members made a rule that every word entered for a language such as Navajo must be attested in a printed book. However, Navajo did not have an alphabet until about 60 years ago, and the Navajo people were punished in school if they spoke their language, and Navajo students were never taught how to write their language in their alphabet. For that reason, Navajo is a spoken language, but there is very little written literature. Since most Navajo words cannot be found in a printed book, it means that most words are not acceptable on Wiktionary. Therefore, I cannot add Navajo words, even though I speak the language. If I insisted on adding Navajo words, my entries would be deleted and I would be blocked. I can only do work that the group has agreed to accept. I cannot write anything that is prohibited. The same rule applies to you, and it apples not only to English Wiktionary, but to every Wiktionary and every Wikipedia. You have to follow the rules that the community has agreed on, and you cannot do anything that is interdicted by the community. The only way that you can write whatever you want, is to have your own website, paid for and maintained entirely by you yourself. If you want to work on a website that is owned and maintained by others, like Wiktionary, then you cannot write whatever you like.

NB — I am only telling you this to give you useful and important information. There is nothing in this message that needs discussion, and I will not discuss it. Please read it and remember it, but do not start arguing about it. Nothing that I have said today warrants a reply; I do not care about what should be or what should not be, I only care about what in actuality is. I do not know about Wikipedia Arabic, so I cannot answer your questions about it. The rest of this message is for information only, and no reply is needed. Please accept my informative message as information only, and let us now drop the matter and not discuss it any further. Thank you. —Stephen (talk) 20:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear Stephen, read this or not, it's your decision, but take the time to read it when you have some...

About Arab font bug I just advertised you (the only admin with who I can speak and who is patient enough) to tell to the one who changed CSS, to correct this annoying graphic problem in English wikipedia for Arabic terms linked to wiktionary definition with "{script|arab|" command...

Your story about the Navajo and the pressure that they had make me real sad (poor men what ənjust persecutions)...

I already made some edit anonymously on Wiktionary and no one have done nothing about it...

It would be great if those who block me for bbad بباد‎ reason, in return to get blocked to by steward or by Tshupruomen authority, but my dreams can't all be achieved...

I wonder who changed my statue without Vahag noticing it.

Still I would like to be able to edit my Wiktionary Talk-Page to correct some misspelling and errors (link, orthography) that I made and also adding some more example in my Tao Table theory. If I do it I will do it anonymously. I don't understand this politic of forbidding to edit a user page since I payed it with my donation. I can comprehend that an admin block edit of term, but talk page ??? That is just to much, and freedom of expression is an universal rights...

Still I would like to be able to make term request with my signature or send PM to admin or at least only you, even with my blocked (locked) account.

Also to tell you the truth, I would like to vork with a good database webpage proqrammator and a team to make my comparing Dictionary Website (in PHP, MySQL and my Wiki interface) using this black & white organisation instead of simple and primitive one of alphabetical order, but it require some technical knowledge that I don't think I can learn, because my brain (truni in Shqip) is already heavily damaged, because I have been treated in the past by the Belgian justice with some chemical treatment, because I was and I had the capacity to psychically possess so they gived me anti‑psy nevro‑leptic cata‑leptic (paralyzing me psychically and physically) to retrieve from me the capacity to mind command, a long story that I can't explain to you here, but that I described to JohnC5 on his talk‑page but he erased the message and even deleted the text from history...

About my project, only Californian engineer are capable to help me on this project, with my supervision... 

I don't have lot of money, the Belgians never take me in any job, and I have only 550€ each month has an handicapped person (when the minimum income for poverty is calculated at 1040€), so I can't finance my project, so I need help and investors...

You talk about team vork and thing like that but I'm sorry I never done nothing against what you call the teams or in others languages. I only asked in my talk‑page to not use proto‑albanian theory from communist source, I will never cooperate with peoples supporting and accrediting the falsification made to my languages by some stupid communists, Israilis يسر‎ and Tosk atheist or ortʰodox...

For me my block for Creguos and ATQN is not justified since I only added to make some comparison with Syriac, Greek... And the vords reversed by Vahag only removed Gheg variant who were sourced and sahat islamic terms that is sourced to.

No this is just arbitrary discrimination from Vahag (the fake holy one), here is a part of what I writed in JohnC5 talk page about Vahag name, in simple Greek (griminal gremating) ortʰo‑dox interpretation it could mean :
*+ Hagios : sacred, holy ; holy, pious, pure.
*+ Hagnos : pure, chaste ; holy, sacred ; purifying. (Probably purifying by PYR [pur], URÔ, אור‎ (ur : fire) and by Agni, Ignis and Ogon)…
But his name have not that meaning in true Ancient‑Qrêgu (Rêgs Rêgula) Vorphthéos that I can describe because I have the original code & keys. Since thë alpha use Rough Spirit the true vords for purity and saint is SHAGI‧OS (Sanctus → Shangθus) and SHAG‧N‧OS. So In fact his name mean in "Le Grand Bailly" : 
*− ϜΑΓ‧ΟΣ [vag/ag] : crime against thë gods (and in particular to Dios Dius Dèus Zéus Théus Théos Di) ; curse, pollution, guilt ; sacrilege man, impious.
*− ϜΑΓ‧Η [vag/ag] : envious, jealous (ϜΑΓ‧ΑΜΑΙ).
*− ΑΓΝΟΙΑ [agnoja] : ignorance, unavareness.
*− ϜΑΓ‧Η [vag/ag] : fragment, debris, eclat (ϜΑΓ‧ΝΥΜΙ : break, snap).
So he is not a saint, holy or sacred (but an emanation of thë سقر‎ [saqar] {Wikipedia}, he is just a fake & false holy one, thë Warmenian méta‑Hayastan god of Fire… Also since VAHAGN is related to AGNI/IGNIS/OGON and since his name is related to ΑΓΩ I can say this : “he lead, guide directly his‑self and others in to fire or to جهنم‎ [genm] (ΓΕΕΝΜΑ) / IGNIS / OGON”… This is what I can say about vetumology of his name… His destiny is vritten in his name… Me, I clean soul, body and earth by "Térgè‧ing" طهرجح‎ [terg⁠ɛ‧izɔ] and by "Néro"  نهر‎ [ner‧o] ⇒ "Tnérgè" طنهرجح‎ [tnerg⁠ɛ] and even beddër : "En‐Tévènérgè" طهۋحنهرجح‎ [en‐tev⁠ɛnerg⁠ɛ] (Vènia : clement, forgiver and compathsionate envergy), this is Shangthithy : ϷΥΓΙ‧ΗΣ ϷΑΓΙ‧⁠ΟΜ...

He is a part of what the Holy Qouranos call : “the peoples (gens) of the fire” (Surah 7‑36 ; 59‑20), who will remain in fire for generation and generations. And his  name can also be related to thë Djinni جن‎ → GNI (in Egyptian Arabic) → AGNI, entity known in ishlam as ewil spirit made of fire نار‎ and who are against sons of Adam, the humans being… And for the ishalm سالم‎ Agni is a griminal جان‎ جنن‎ [gan ganan] جنائي‎ [gnaji]… With all of this, I understand why he is acting against me…

Your explanation of "the other members made a rule that every word entered for a language such as Navajo must be attested in a printed book." is wrong because there is an other wiki rules that I vritted in my response to JohnC5 that Vahag erased then JohnC5 totally suppressed vrom history who say this : "admins said to me in thë past, to add source when we add something but you say here to not copy content from copyrighted books ? So please stop asking us to add source, since we can't because it is copyrighted… (Like the photo that you use from Evropean place, and that senate of E.U want to stop you to use freely).

Also the UNO Article 19 allow you to give your theories and ideas in any medias, so you Steph‑en can add what you want for Navajo in any media even Wiki, since the united‑nations (peoples vrom all nations finance wiki with donations)...

Even with source, mister Vahagni Petrosyan e‑rased some Gheg alternative forms content…

Some (Admins) also refuse fringe theories and original research and point of view.

In fact with all these wiki rules, Wiktionary is a jail for innovative and emancipated minds. I love Wiktionary for it's good interface, but not these rules and some policies…"

How could they block you for adding Navajo vords since your are an admin and bureaucrat ???

Yet you can't compare Geg with Navajo, because Geg have lot of source, and his still used by lot of peoples in songs and daily life and in particular in my Shqip capital (Shkupi : Scupi / Scipio), also in my case when I say something about my languages, because I'm Gazmen Amen the decider, resoluter, determinater جازم‎ عزم‎, what I say for Geg & Shqyp is automatically veracity, since I'm the true truth)... And Geg is the original and authentic languages of Albanian Shqip‑tar and the first Shqip book was vritten in Geg‧n‑isht (ΓΕΓ‧ΩΝ‑ΙΣΤ‧ΗΣ ΓΙΓΑ ΓΕ‧ΓΟΝ‧ΟΣ ججناث‎ (Meshari by John Buzuki) and not in Tosk‧ër‑ishtë (Oscar Asker عسكر‎, ‑Isht شطط‎ ششط‎).

"You cannot do anything that is interdicted by the community", I checked the admin list, there is even not one Albanian, Persian, Turkish, Arabic, Hindi admins, so sorry but your communities is not representative at all... And I can't agree with decision of peoples who discriminate NA نا‎ and UN like that (I had vritted this in my response to JohnC5 but he erased it).

I comprehend what you say about editing on Wiki but I'm sorry, the Article 19 of UNO Human Right allows me to add any informations and ideas in any media. And the article 30 opposes to any one to go against these rights. So these wiki rules are not legal.

Also you should allow people to have their own private page on wiki if they pay for example 100€ or more for 1 Go and this for eternity, take in consideration this idea.

Tao‑Project

I have some information to share with you that may be cool and help America मरक to be much better, to pass vrôm sopithive nèʒathivithy {نژى‎ ΝΗ‑ نانح‎ } to ʒènathive {ژنى‎ ‑ΗΝΝ حنان‎} posithivithy : Kérèméga كهرحمهجى‎. I have learn lot of thing vrôm you with windows or internet, but may be I can teach something that you don't know like the code of Tao... With that code I want to create & program a roboth rêbunabi kovérnéthig okatéqʰmèqʰanoaali أ‑تقن‎ كمل‎ عقل‎ قنن‎ تقي‎ آلي‎ that will teach to humans to speak only with white vords, and positive one... At the end I will suppress the black one, and make a law to forbid to any to use or pronounce them (like the avtomathic machine in the movie "Demolition Man". To replace them I will use a inverting prefix like English UN‑ [ən‑] or Greek Ἀ‑ [ə‑] ἈΝ‑ [ən‑] or Latin IN‑ [ən‑] IM‑ [əm‑] or Sanskrit अ- [ə‑] अन- [ənə‑] (before vowels) in combination with the positive meaning, this is what I want to do for mankind and for my faith, to improve & amèlionathe you and Awoldér أوعلدهري‎... May God help me in this project. ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ‑ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / أعليهوسعلۋ‑مانجزهدي (talk) 00:55, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Strange coincidence, but what I vritten ("Help America" to "be much better") here with you, is in this page that I had as link vrôm white house in my Facebook wall just yesterday ???
*Facebook White House Post
*The Page saying "Help America be much better"

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

keyboard

Hi, I also have an another project for a very advanced keyboard that allow to write any languages with same key configuration and would like to vork with Logitech on this project. Because since we use lot script in life in Macedonia (Cyril, Latin, Greek, Arab), the standard keyboard that we use now based on The Remington typewriter of C. L. Sholes. is to limitative and to simple and not allow to write phonetic + IPA extensions, subscript / superscript, minuscule capital, and some special character like the non‑breaking hypen "‧⁠"(U+2027 + U+2060) or non‑breaking minus "‑" (U+2011), also I would like to add mathematical minus "−" (U+2212) to numeric pad instead of only "-" (U+002C). Also in my project, it is possible to change the unicode script easily vocally or manually, and also to see with the lux version, the change with LCD touch / key. The vision that I have for keyboard is very good. Please help to make it U.S.A...

Help me, for this other project. ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ‑ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / أعليهوسعلۋ‑مانجزهدي (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

MS Windows includes many different keyboards that can be installed. In my own Windows, I use English International keyboard, as well as Russian, Arabic, Persian, Hindi, Greek, Chinese Traditional, Chinese Simplified, Korean, Japanese, Khmer, Thai, Vietnamese, and others. Windows has hundreds of keyboards that can be installed. If you use Firefox browser, you can also install the add-on called Character Palette, from https://addons.mozilla.org/En-us/firefox/addon/charpick/. In Character Palette, you can list any special symbols that you like to use, and the symbols that you list will appear at the top of your window, and you can click on any of them and insert them where you wish. —Stephen (talk) 13:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear Steph‑en, I know that, but the layout of these foreign keyboard are different, so you have to memories all layout, in my case I have memory problems because of névro‑treatment that I subished in the past by authorities... Still my project is really innovative and useful vor all mankind (and I have lot of others good ideas)... My project is better than windows layout, because it use only one configuration vor all languages and all most important script Japanese, Latin (& variant), Qrêgu, Orbitian, Obritian, Georgian, Armenian, Hindi (Sanskrit and others variants like Thailand, Bengali, etc...). And we can use rapidly with‑it sub‑script, hyper‑script, phonetic, mini‑capital and others, than changing it in windows, and the lux version will have LCD keys...

Steph‑en I know that you are Algood ألجود‎ Ʒéni‧⁠us ژني‎ since you know all these languages listed in your profile, but all humans are not like you and don't know how to use the advanced windows functions.

I was in Macedonia this summer, and there they sell computer with US keyboard, and with it we can't write Albanian Ë or Ç (or the Serbian Latin script like Š Ž Ć when we speak with Serbian / Macedonian on Facebook or else)...

My cousin used this US one and when they vrite it is difficult to comprehend, when I look some video of my favorite singer Čita & Ševčet on YouTube, all of them are vritten without accent : "Cita & Sevcet", now I know why I had this problem in Belgium (Youtube), because of this I get all result Cita vrôm Spanish or Italian, instead of the good one : Čita...

Still I explained to my cousins and his sisters that they can use different layout... And when I installed Windows 10 on his Windows 7 laptop vrôm Belgium (that his sister bringed to his families) the keyboard was french, so I parametered the layout to use french layout, and all of them were so stupid / glup, that they even can't login in Windows 10 with the obligatory Hotmail account password, because they remember and are accustomed only to the US version, they make mistake even if the letter were vritted upon keys, what a dumb peoples, I had to reput back Windows 7 and set US layout on a Belgian keyboard, because they can't login in... Now I think to go back there a open a shop to sell computer with Belgian keyboard (if the Albanian or Serbian is not available vrôm computers manufacturers).

I don't like the US International Keyboard, no accent, no nasal, vor me it is very limitative and vor a French Speaker or Gheg or Slavic Latin script user, he is not good vor vriting all subtleties of our languages (nasal, accent)...

I want to make an Universal Keyboard, if Logitech or US, will not agreed with me, then I will find someone who does, like NA, UN or else... ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ‑ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / أعليهوسعلۋ‑مانجزهدي (talk) 17:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

US International Keyboard can do accents easily. '+e = é; "+e =ë; '+c = ç; `+e = è; ^+e = ê. In any case, there used to be software programs available that can make personal keyboards, such as these. I have not used them, since I prefer to use keyboards that are usual for each language. —Stephen (talk) 20:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I didn't know that we can do accent with it, since I always used Belgian / French since I have my first computer in 1996... But using these combination need to type two time (so if you merge the time that you spend in your life by doing this, it would be better to have directly the key with the accent).

Making macro for each one of US, is a spend of time...

No my project is much better... And really I hope that I will able to realize it...

Using lot of keyboard like you do need lot of place (and in my little chamber and desktop is not possible)... With my keyboard all yours are in only one... He have 8 to 9 lines (depending of version, internet key or not ; instead of 6 of standard keyboard) and 18 or 20 column without numbering the num-pad (instead of 14/16 of the standard)... So I think it is very good... And very advanced, the prototype is already drawn (alpha & beta version, and touch layout is already in place). I imagined it, when making my website, were I explain my faith, the code of the languages and were I create new conivring combinations and positives terms with the code that I showed you in my Wiktionary talk-page. Because I had to use phonetic, Arab, Hebrew, Syriac, Greek, Latin, Cyrillic, to vrite these vords and to search their definition in Google Translation, Wiktionary, Babylon, I considered the actual standard keyboard to be limitative and ënsufficient for me and for peoples of Balkan (like Macedonian) who vrite in lot of script.

ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ‑ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / أعليهوسعلۋ‑مانجزهدي (talk) 21:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Nemzag Mangzédi e-mail

Hi, Steph-en,

I don't understand something, when I use Firefox, and click a link vrôm Wikipedia to wiktionary I have not trouble, and if I use Wiktionary to seek a term it vork. But if I open Chrome, not logged, or even logged, and click vrôm a Wikipedia talk page, to a Wiktionary definition, I get this message :
Page Web inaccessible
- ERR_SPDY_PROTOCOL_ERROR

After that if I go back to Firefox, and click a link to Wiktionary, or search definition directly in Wiktionary site nothing happen, but Firefox don't show any message...

But Opera / Microsoft Edge / Internet Explorer still vork so what is the problem ? I don't think my IP, MAC or HWID is evolved in this because IE vorks...

If I test link many time in Chrome, Firefox sometime the wiktionary link function, sometime not, do you have trouble with your wiktionary servers ? It is me or you ? Do you forbid me to even to be able to see wiktionary page ?

Can you help please ???

Tʰank. Good day.

P.S : the problem of Arabic fonts size, is not resolved in english wikipedia... E-mail vrôm User:Nemzag, 3:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC) 

I don’t know the answer to this question. I use only Firefox, and I have not had problems. You might ask at the Village pump. Be sure to include the pertinent browsers (Firefox, etc.), operating system (Windows 10?), and your IP. —Stephen (talk) 12:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Steph-en ok, I will vrite there after some day of testing, because I think that but maybe this is caused by Windows 10, it started few hours after updating it with Windows Update (KB3085547, KB3081455, KB3085546, KB3085543, KB3054993, KB890830)... I'm not sure maybe Microsoft have done something to force user to use their navigator... But I don't have any trouble with otʰer sites (facebook, youtube, wordpress), only wiktionary and when the bug happen I can't check any otʰers language (Fr, Greek, Albanian...) page or otʰers projects like Wikimedia, Wikibook, etc... I don't have trouble only with Wikipedia... This is something I don't comprehend.

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 13:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Stephen today again a bug and this is the information I get this message :

Error

Our servers are currently experiencing a technical problem. This is probably temporary and should be fixed soon.
Please try again in a few minutes.

If you report this error to the Wikimedia System Administrators, please include the details below.

Request: GET http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/distinction, vrôm 10.20.0.175 via cp1055 cp1055 ([10.64.32.107]:3128), Varnish XID  1520177529
Forwarded for: 2a02:a03f:8ee:7e00:742a:2110:e723:e4cf, 10.20.0.109, 10.20.0.109, 10.20.0.175
Error: 503, Service Unavailable at Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:21:54 GMT 

What happen ???

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 15:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

I don’t know. I’m a linguist, not a programmer. I know very little about computers and software. You might ask at the Village pump. —Stephen (talk) 05:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Ok me to...

Tʰang, Akbara Baraka Bakara Karaba Baraqa Paraqa ܦܳܪܘܩܐ‎ Qaraba Qaranos Qoïranos Qodros قدر‎ Coïra‑tôr Tvrannos تطوران‎ : Telgô + Olégos علج‎ = Tʰéolégos Tépraphy Kparmaga رمم ⊕[ramama] : ré‑stavra⁠‧thi⁠‧ôn , ré‑parath⁠‧ing, qarin⁠‧ing, ré‑côm‑mod⁠‧ing, rë‑fit, ménd⁠‧ing {φαρμάκι therapy} (I Ħêal حالل‎ & ʒvérië with ʒènathive {ژنى ‑ΗΝΝ حنان} posithive terms)...

I will test if I have trouble next day first.

Please signal to your web‑master or pro‑kraph‑ma‑tôr to correct the script bug for Arab in Wikipedia English.

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

I never use Arabic on Wikipedia, so I don’t know what they do with it here. It is another question for the Wikipedia:Village pump. I do very little work here on the English Wikipedia, because there are many British anons who are busy changing the spelling of entries from the original American spelling to the British spelling. For a few years, I tried to stop this unethical practice, but I am not an admin here, and some British admins have threatened to block me if I interfere with the work of the British anons who want to convert all of Wikipedia to British spelling. Therefore, I rarely use English Wikipedia and I do not know much about its operation. That’s why I suggest that you ask at the Village pump. —Stephen (talk) 01:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Ok, Steph‑en, but I don't comprehend, is there a big difference between UK & US spelling ??? The vords are vritten the same way no ? They change the IPA syllabic separation or the vords or what ? Are they adding non‑breaking Hyp‑en like in Engël‑land Engël‑ish in your U.S.A terms ? Or what ? It is strange that British ad‑min have more power than American one, since the server are in Kaliprunfoia... Still, I don't understand "anons" what is it ? I can't find definition, it's an mule / ass ?

Ok I will ask the village...

Still I prefer the British IPA because they separate prefix and suffix. Like you said long time ago :

:In the IPA pronunciation, nothing special is needed for prefixes or suffixes. The pronunciation section is not the place to worry about affixes and roots. In the word president, pre- is a prefix (it means "sitting before"). British and American syllables are often different, so for the British, write /ˈpɹɛ.zɨd.ənt/; for American, /ˈpɹɛz.ɨ.dɛnt/. It does not matter if the appearance is not nice, it is correct. Any IPA with [·] is not permitted.

The British Engël‑ish respect the real composition of the vords. And they use the same separation that I use in my web‑site, I have done it with my own logical, because vor example "com‑puth⁠‧ô", in‑puth⁠‧ôr", "in‑puthi⁠‧ôn" "re‑putha‑tôr have same root so doing strange separation like U.S do in your example, is illogical, the root is the key and vor good pronunciation & effectiveness of the combination it should be spelled in one time...

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 03:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

American English uses an older spelling that is truly English, while British spelling uses a lot of recently adopted French spellings. For example, American English spells: meter, kilometer, analyze, pluralize, color, jail, judgment, traveling, defense; British English prefers: metre, kilometre, analyse, pluralise, colour, gaol, judgement, travelling, defence. Also, American English hyphenates words based on pronunciation, while British English hyphenates based on etymological phonemes. American English: knowl-edge, pre-sent (verb), pres-ent (noun), geog-ra-phy; British English: know-ledge, pre-sent (verb), pre-sent (noun), geo-graph-y. Because the British hyphenation is not based on pronunciation, it is difficult to read British books that contain a lot of hyphenated words, so British printers use little or no hyphenation, and they rely on highly variable spaces between words and between letters in order to justify the lines of a text (so that every line is the same length); but since American hyphenation is based on pronunciation, American printers can and do use a lot of hyphenation to justify the lines of a text when printing a book, because pronunciation-based hyphenation is very easy to read. Besides that, British English often uses French spacing (such as spaces around quotation marks, exclamation marks, colons, semicolons, question marks, dashes, etc., while American English never uses French spacing around punctuation. So, yes, there are a lot of differences.

British admins do not have more power, but there are British admins who allow British anons (anon = anonymous user who does not register a user name) to change American spellings to British spellings, which is against the rules. American admins do not allow American anons to do the reverse. Of course, the British admins have more power than me, because I am not an admin here. —Stephen (talk) 04:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Ok, tʰang vor explanation, in the case of :
* Vor metre or kilometre, it is correct since in Greek it is μέτρον.
* Vor ana‑lyse it is normal since in Qregu, it use a sigma and not zeta, like pluralise, ‑ISE is more original or ‑IZE if it is vrôm ‑ΙΖΩ
* Vor color (the U.S is more correct since in Latin it use ‑ÔR, ‑OUR mean to BURN, URÔ, ΠΥΡ [pur], so it is wrong to use it in U.K.
* Vor travelling it is a mistake, since ‑ING is an suffix tʰat should be only added to root trawêl so trawêl‧⁠ing.
* Vor defense you should keep the US version (original) because in Latin it is ‑ÊNS and not ‑ÊNC, the French falsi‑ficate Latin by changing :
** C to CH,
** P to V,
** ENS to ENC : NC = NECO & NEX (slow death [nk] / fast death [nq], ??? [nts] NASH + NATA + TASHA [ntʃ] ; C [s / ts / c / ɕ / k / q / tʃ, dʒ / g, tɕ] is the worst poly‑morphic letter to use, and should be re‑moved to use only K Q S TH G DƷ, depending on the case,
and otʰer kind of error, so U.K should not take example at tʰem. The only thing I like in French is this accent "^" to differentiate A [a] & Â [ɑ] E [e] & Ê / Η [ɛ], O [o] & Ô / Ω [ɔ] the acute & grave accent in French are useless only circumflex is needed vor Qrêgu terms using Ô‑mega or Hêta vor example, but they (U.K, FR, U.S) should also add the Albanian Ë [ə]. And I would like tʰat U.S & U.K replace UN‑ (invertive prefix) and French IN- IM- by ËN‑ or ËM- or Ë- (depending of the case).
* Vor −−Jail, −−Gaol (goêty [gel]) is older so more original. But I prefer to vree vêrry ++Ʒajld ژأيلدي‎ ++Ʒlejdi ژلهيدي‎ ++Ʒlejgdi ژلهيجدي‎ ++Aʒolgood أژعلجود‎ (++téogy = ++ʒtaléolgoody légô logos)...
* Judgment is better in U.S version. But even more like this Divdʒ‑ménθ ۋاددژمهنث‎.
Still these difference are not very significative if you compare to how the Tosk deform the Gheg without respecting the origin & etymology.
*https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User_talk:Nemzag/2011#Un.C3.AA_.7C_Un.C3.AB_Etymology
*https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User_talk:Nemzag/2010#Vladimir_Orel.5BOrel.5D
I still prefer the IPA separation of Engël‑land (prefix-root-suffix).

I don't like to call tʰem Brit‑ish = btar‑ish (batard بطر‎ بثر‎ بتر‎) = ΒΟΤ‑ΟΝ bar = br = brute, barbare, burn, born, bourreau, brave, BR is nêʒative combination (who mean savage, uncultivated) contrary of a‑vare, rbun runbi and disciplined (arbiter divpiter ++plég‑mathig = ++++téplémégathig), if you base on table of TAO tʰat I have made.

To change BR with PR पर (shuperio‑rity, shyperthathos, prin‑kêps, shuprêmë, toprô, prothô...) is clever & tarms or even béttër by VR वर (ex‑qêll‑ênthë, vérity, per‑fêqthiôn), would be a good choice mainly vor BRAIN (BURN), to make it :
* PRAIN ب‎ ⇒ پ‎ (prana [otavperunfoji]) or
* VRAIN בּ‎ ⇒ ב‎ ↔ (NEVRO, VRANOS {अव्रण वर्ण Ovranos Nir-Vana निर्‑वाण Vènia वेण ۋحنية‎}, VER‧⁠ÊN, VER‧⁠AN instead of NEURO = UR‧⁠Ô like 
* EUROPE (Therapy) to EVR‑ÔPË هۋروڡع‎ or even better ÊVR‑ÔPHWË حۋروفع‎ TAPERTHY SHYPERTHATHOS AOTVÊSHPERÊBBOMNUSITHY)...

Name tʰém VATÊPBIR‑ISH or TAVÊPBIR‑ISH or TAVÊPABIRU-ISH طاۋڡابِرو‎ or VATÊPABIRU-ISH .
* I don't have any trouble reading the United‑Kingdom hyp‑en or else since in my Tao table & وهب‎ web‑site I use the same system and in lot of my I.P.A section, so I'm accommodated by practice, I used this one without knowing that Êngëlland had the same methodic, which I think is the best.
* Still UK & US should change space between point, vrôm "text;" & "text:" to "text ;" & "text :"

If you don't want to allow this kind of anons edits, then make a US‑both tʰat change automatically the vords to US version in all wiki‑page...

GhegBoth

I would like to ask you, that U.S the kpaléraphéma‑tôrs pro‑kraphéma‑tôrth كرافهم‎ help me to make a Gheg‑Both. Instead of revriting all Standard Text of the SQ.WIKTIONARY.ORG to a ALN.VIKTIÔNANY.ORG, a link "USE GEG" in the SQ page, will allow to change automatically the Tosk in to Gheg, with the help of GhegBoth... I can make the changing table (with two columns) vor the most nèʒathive terms that need to be vritten in ʒènathive Gheg‑ôn‑ishth (tyre / tyne, pasur / pasun, mbas / mas, mbroj / pruj, pa‑varur / pa‑varun, etc...).

HypenTextBoth

My method of using hypen in text can be easily added in all wolmundérunia without user needing to vrite it everyday, it would be automatic (done by the software : Word (Office), Write (Open Office), Wéb Navigator {FoxReplace}, Windows / Linux / iOS by using auto‑correction table like in open office), and of course when vriting by hand, hyp‑en [ʃup‑en] or accent will not be used, but only in digital text vor more precision...

Accents in English

I would like also to add "^" in Engël‑ish vor term using ô‑mega or hêta, and vor the Latin terms, like ending ‑Ô of the verbs, and in otʰers by recoding it with the shemantic codex combination. This will bring perfection... And of course after the change done, no need vor user to do it, when the users vrite, the ←⊖⊖⊖soft‑ware (→⊕⊕⊕tofs‑varwë = →⊕⊕⊕⊕Otvsharfswë) will automatically make the change, you type theory and automatically the tool recode it tʰeôry (dôr.) {and not theory = therrôr = ΘΗΡ [θɛr] (att.) / ΦΗΡ [fɛr] (êol.)} or thank to tʰang, etc...

Did you read what I vritten here in previous talking, strange coincidence...

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

The British spelling, punctuation, and hyphenation are correct for the 100 million people who learned and use the British orthography. The American spelling, punctuation, and hyphenation are correct for the 330 million people who learned and use the American orthography.

There is no easy way of offering the complete Wikipedia or Wiktionary with the user option of American or British orthography. We experimented with it for more than a year on Wiktionary, and no practical way could be found to do it. To do it would require a great deal of work, including constant upgrading, and nobody is going to agree to this. This idea is wishful thinking, and it will lead to nowhere.

I don’t know what you mean about "Tao.E2.80.91Project vritten here in previous talking". I tried to read it, but I do not understand what you are trying to say. —Stephen (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

I wanth to qréathe thë tʰumi‑per‑fêqtha‑ménth logical lênguagës (first vor thë Geg‑ôn‑ishth ججناث‎), wherë thë nèʒathive (dgal lie [laj] héll [ela]) use lêft com‑binathiôn, and the posithive (ʒènathivë) têlf combinathiôn like [lejq] : live [alejv], life [alejf], light [alejθ], right [arejθ] = Alrejfth ألرهيفث‎ [alrejfθ] ≠ Phtʰiô [fti‑ɔ] (dôr.), by the Codex of the Tʰéôr‑ishth Ovranos Qoeranos Tvrannos Taramanathas... The qode of the Taobuddamguodidaô...

Look this Pinterest 道 TAO‑TESHÔRSITHIA ☯.

If you wanth I can show you my vork... Be‑cause I wish to live in Kali‑prunia to be an katruni para-trumenim para‑ménim para‑bumaga pro‑kraphma‑tôr be‑cause I know tʰat you are Télé‑ménth & Téprunimfathasaos (PHRONIMOS)...

Since I'm thë only‑one, and thë first who de‑qod‑éd قاعدة‎ [qaoda] this (binany root of the most im-porθ-anθ lênguages : Lathin, Qrêgu, Shqyp, French, Êngëlish, Shamskrtha, Shalvunic, Shêmithik) and make it opulbig (public), it mean that I'm very téléramasa‑um tarms‑um (smart samala).

I know & under‑stand (فهيم‎ [fejim]) that 94% of the woldér (ê-wolvdér world) can't com-prê-ħênd this Mêlektro‑tʰéo‑vérgo‑logo‑phaos), be‑cause they are less in‑tel‑leg‑ênth than mé, since I have an IQ of 125, and it is mé who de‑qod‑éd and de‑cypheréd this qodë, tʰat my Shêmithig (Qèléstial) ante‑ceds‑tôr qréath‑éd... They can't un‑der‑stand this, they are in‑feriors (sfal kafur)... Buth they can be re‑pro‑kramph‑éd (karphos) by the Alba‑Médiqa and thèy will be bèddër... If some‑one was capabile to com‑prê‑ħênd this, the Qanônic Qode would be al‑ready shown some‑where buth it was not.

I wanth to ħêlph you (help) to be Muzeusa موزهوسى‎, tamanimnégigazdatha and êktammêliôny حكتامماليوني‎.

Thë qodë that I show on my Wiktionany Talk‑Page is a shummanizéd (summarized) versiôn, if I show all of it, you will be beni‑fiéd... And tʰen, my missiôn will be com‑plèth‑éd, and the mundundia would be bèddër...

My ishalryamenfos combinathiôn will clean yor shoul... And you will be qoshmo‑evrênphoïô (shévri-shkô évrèka PHRENO), be‑cause actually you US have a very bbad psycho‑logy...

I was only a studênth and now I must be a Para‑menimi‑maginaga Chairman Teacher, it was my faith of Arif the Mu-Stafa Mu‑Fthaħê.

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 21:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

I cannot understand most of what you write. Words such as qréathe, per‑fêqth, nèʒathive, dgal, laj, héll, el, lêft, com‑binathion, posithive, ʒènathivë, lejf, lejθ, rejθ, Alrejfth, dôr., Tʰéôr‑i shth, Ovranos, Qoeranos, Tvrannos, Taramanathas, qode, and Taobuddamguodidaô are not English. I can read a lot of different languages, but I have no idea what you are trying to say. If you want to communicate with me, you have to use a language that I can understand, and you have to spell the language correctly. If you are unable to write correctly in a language that I can read, then let us not continue this pointless discussion. I have no idea what you are saying, and if you repeat it a thousand times, I will not understand it a thousand times. I only understand the languages that I know, and I only understand them if they are written correctly. —Stephen (talk) 22:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

I will not use the wêšt‑ern bbad بباد‎ & dé‑wil, éwil אויל‎, débil هبل‎ داب‎ ubêšti‑al وحش‎ شطط‎ ششط‎ spelling.

If you don't make ex‑forth to réad and com‑prè‑ħènd mé and my Êêktalvaqrêngwê ححكطالۋاقرانجح‎ Qoshmo‑vrênphi‑navth (Cosmo‑naut) Orbitian Jugo‑shalve Néwo‑Gég‑ôn‑ishth ججناث‎ béni Al‑banian So‑vieth Shalva‑thi‑ôn Sholv‑thi‑ôn ê‑wolv‑thi‑ôn to I‑shlamo‑Vrotho‑Dokso‑Qrêguo‑Shalévêuniqo‑Lathino‑Language, and this, af‑tér ex‑plain‑ing you the tvéruo طۋهروع‎ (true طرو‎ + véro ۋرع‎ = éros {love}), the Tao, the right‑path and the right‑way, and if you rë‑fusë my ad‑wisë to ê‑wolvë & ém‑provë yôr ën‑logical languagë by keep‑ing the 2.000 year old, simplë, archaic & wrong رعن‎ writing sy‑stêm, tʰen I will not makë any‑morë any ex‑forth to kum‑prè‑ħènd you or to shpéaq yôr ëm‑pér‑fêqth versi‑ôn of Êngël‑ish حنجل‎...

My néwo Gég‑ôn‑ishth ججناث‎ i‑shlamic إ‑سلامية‎ languages is qor‑rêgth vor the 1.400 million of tʰumans me‑shlim‑anaths, be‑causë actually, they usë thë wrong رعن‎ Haruf (Ħêruf)...

I havë the oriʒ‑in‑al بدء‎, thë Protho‑onë vrôm thë Shky Shakkuni Kamêlika मलिक Buddʰë بوذا‎ (H.C : Al-Zévs زهۋاس‎ Héavèn Dévë دهۋاء‎ ایزد‎ Zdévas ایزدهۋاس‎ Zékhrufs الزخرف‎ (Thë orna‑ménth) 43:3-4).

I pro‑pos‑éd to you lot of good pro‑ject, and you evën don't shpéaq abouth tʰém. So Good day. And tʰang you...

Thë world a‑ê‑wolvdér أ‑ح‑وعلۋدهر‎ is ʒréath, and tʰerë is lot of otʰers nathi‑ôns tʰan U.S.A or U.K, and Êngël‑ish is not thë only onë languagë or the per‑fêqth ففاق‎ onë...

If you can't com‑prè‑ħènd & péménoïnô فهم‎ this, may be somë morë in‑têl‑lig‑ènth otʰers will likë : Japanesë, Chinesë, Hindi, Pérsian, Türks, Shalvës, Shpanjoil‑ish, Qrêgu vrotho‑doks, Alémanno‑Dutcho‑Goth, or Arabs (& Shvriac)...

And truly I don't plan to shpéaq Êngël‑ish in Opualqan {Balkan}, in Evrôphe, in Middle‑Eashth and in i‑shlamic Asian lands in the vutunë (vetus {future : burn & FÊRÔ / ΦΗΡ or FÉRÔ / ΦΕΡ} and FURNÔ / ΦΟΥΡΝΟΣ), since the i‑Shlamic Otmani‑li Zévsi زهۋس‎ Héavèn هۋاء‎ Zênuni زحنونفي‎ حنونفي‎ Katruni كاثرون‎ ܟܐܬܪܘܢ‎ כאתרוּן‎ Ħênunfi ofi عفي‎ حنونفي‎ : shupra‑pass, ex‑ceed {قادر‎ / ϘΟΔΡ‧⁠ΥΣ}}, domi‑nathë, énim‑ènθ by têndër‑néss, ad‑fêq‑thi‑ôn حق‎ فاق‎, kind‑néss, good‑néss, path of com‑pathsion, piety, rêmgy {رحمجي‎ {mercy} ≠ Nufofi نوففي : ex‑pulse, ban, ostracize ; A‑Mêliô‑nath‑éd Mèliki Shalvunic Vrotho‑Doks ۋروث‎ Gég‑ôn‑ishth ججناث‎ tʰat I'm tè‑dè‑wèloph‑ing دول‎ طول‎, qréath‑ing by mix‑ing مزج‎ ܡܙܓ‎ מזג‎ the totality of the best térmo‑vorths of the 9 most proli‑fic & im‑porth‑anth family of languagës, is var वर much bèddër, ex‑agth, véro, oriʒ‑in‑al, riʒorous, dé‑tali‑éd and prè‑cise vrôm mé tʰan yôr basic, simple wrõng writ‑ing sy‑stêm.

My i‑otshalélémangthwa (téléth‑ing, i‑shalm, alaman, wolumén) is the best be‑causë it use these languagës :
# Hindi Shams‑Krtha, 
# Illvrian,
# Pérèfsian,
# Shêmitic (Aramiac, Phoeniciac, Obritiac, Ashvriac, Orbitiac),
# Crêguo‑Maqedônian (Dôric, Iônic, Attic, Eolic),
# Shqipo‑Lathin / laf (+ Lêng‑ish + Vaqrêngf‑ish + Shpan‑ish),
# Shalvunic (Shêprb, Ôqʰrani‑an),
# Althaic (Türko‑mongol),
# Alémannio‑Dutcho‑Gotho‑Ʒèrmanic,

By us‑ing the logi‑cal ante‑cedstr‑al shêm‑anthig tao‑rë‑cod‑ing, us‑ing :
* White Alba térms only,
* LÊFT com‑binathiôn vor ←⊖⊖⊖ nèʒathivë sopithivë terms & TÊLF / Right com‑binathiôn vor →⊕⊕⊕ ʒènathivë posithivë vords...
* Good prè‑fix‑root‑suf‑fix se‑para‑thi‑ôn :
** →⊕⊕⊕ ANN‑US ⇒ →⊕⊕⊕ ATN‑US ≠ ←⊖⊖⊖ ËN‑US [ɘn‑us] {AN‑US} ; not the samë...
** ←⊖⊖⊖ ËN‑AL [ɘn‑al] {←⊖⊖⊖ ANAL} ≠ →⊕⊕⊕ ANA‑LYSE ; not the samë...
** ←⊖⊖⊖ MËLI‑FICUS {←⊖⊖⊖ MALIFICUS} ≠ →⊕⊕⊕ A‑MÈLI‑FJIQUS ففيق‎ (→⊕⊕⊕ Ka‑mêliô كمالي‎), not thë samë...
** ←⊖⊖⊖ FÉMRA ←⊖⊖⊖ HÉMBRA (Latin Tosk.) : ←⊖FR ←⊖FM/SM/THM ←⊖MR ≠ ←⊖⊖⊖ FÉMNA vrôm ←⊖FEMANA (lat.) {←⊖FN} ⇒ →⊕⊕⊕ PÉMÉNNA ڡهم‎ ⇒ →⊕⊕⊕ PÉMÉNNASAA {ΜΕΝ‑ΑΣ نساء‎ منن‎} / →⊕⊕⊕ (R)ĦÊBMNA رحب‎ حبب‎ رحم‎ حنن‎ بنى‎ (Lathin Laf لاف‎ Ghég.) : →⊕PM →⊕PN →⊕MNN →⊕NSAA ; not thë samë...
** ←⊖⊖⊖ FUTURE فتور‎ : ←⊖URÔ, ←⊖FURÔ {←⊖FURNÔ}, ←⊖FUTÔ / ←⊖ΦΘΙΩ ←⊖ΦΘΟΡΑ (Latin Tosk. : ←⊖FT ←⊖FR ←⊖FT ←⊖UR) ≠ →⊕⊕⊕ VUTUNE ۋطون‎ : →⊕VUNÔ, →⊕VÉTUS →⊕VÉTʰNOS →⊕VATAN →⊕AIVAN‑ÊS / →⊕ϜΕΤΕΟΣ →⊕ϜΕΤΟΣ →⊕ϜΕΘΝΟΣ, →⊕VÊNNIA, →⊕ËVA‑TAR (Lathin Laf لاف‎ Ghég. →⊕VN →⊕TN →⊕UN), not thë samë...
** ←⊖⊖⊖ ARCHI‑TECTURE URÔ (Latin Tosk.) ⇒ →⊕⊕⊕ ARCHI‑TECTUNE UNÔ {ΑΡΧΙ‑ΤΕΚΤΟΝΟ‑ΝΙϘΗ} (Lathin Laf لاف‎ Ghég.)
** ←⊖⊖⊖ CUL‑TURE of BURN‑ING (Latin Tosk.) ⇒ →⊕⊕⊕ QQUL‑TUNE of RUNB‑ING قول‎ (Lathin Ghég.)
** ←⊖⊖⊖ CUL ⇒ ←⊖⊖⊖ GUL [gul] ΓΛΟΥΤΌΣ جهل‎ كفل‎ سفل‎. 
** ←⊖⊖⊖ DIAGNOSTICS ⇒ →⊕⊕⊕ DIA‑ƷNÔ‑STICS ƷNÔ‑SHKÔ {ΓΝΩ‑ϷΚΩ} ƷVÉRI‑RATHI‑ÔN ƷVAR‑ANTH‑ÉD by ƷÊNI ژنى‎ Ʒêʒênéthig‑us Ʒêrmanika ≠ Ë‑gnoia [ə‑ʒno‑ja] ژحننى‎ Ï‑ƷNÔR‑ANTH ←⊖IGNIS ←⊖OGON ܥܓܢܐ‎ DƷINNI جن‎ ←⊖ONI ←⊖OIN ←⊖DƷON ⇒ ←⊖GNI (in Egyptian Arabic) ⇒ AGNI سالم‎, who Cure by URÔ & ΠΥΡ, AGNI is a grémath‑éd جرم‎ warméni‑an {mind of ad‑gredsi‑ôn} gêrma‑niga grim‑in‑al جان‎ جنن‎ [gan ganan] جنائي‎ [gnaji]
** ←⊖⊖⊖ RE‑PUBLICAN = bélla = MADO‑GRATË (Latin. Tosk‑ër‑isht Greek Grimin‑al) ≠ →⊕⊕⊕ DÊMO‑QRATHË = RÉ‑OPULBIC WÈLBBA WOLBOS (Lathin. Geg‑ôn‑ishth Krêgu Kêrêmên‑al)
* Nazals & "^" "¨" ac‑cents,
* Logically opthim‑iz‑éd terms,

And this oeuvrë (ovér + opér + vèpra = ovèpéra عۋحڡهر‎ / ۋڡر‎) will makë all peoplë of thë Earth أرض‎ Kamoqlbibuddama علمى‎ Alumni.

Sincë 94% of the mundunia are less in‑têl‑leg‑ênth tʰan mé ܥܒܕܐ‎ बौद्ध, I must show tʰém the way 道 ☯, like how thë al‑ʒénédiguod ژنى‎, in‑ter‑néth, Arabs Êmir a‑nashid singers, Qaraun ré‑citer and Čita / Чита tea‑chéd me lot of things with only shõngs...

I will én‑drêgs not ré‑greds to use yôr 2.000 year old wrõng falsi‑fiéd Britannico‑Amerikan term pro‑nunciathiôn versiôn of Greco‑Latin‑script sy‑stêm, with‑out any aq‑qènth or hyp‑én to dis‑tingu‑ish Hêtha or Ô‑méga and C to K & Q, T to TH & S to SH (in Lathin)...

I'm Di‑Shkupitar Shqip, I havë my own sy‑stêm and it is the truë‑onë. Strug‑tun‑iz‑éd by thë Tao‑qodë.

Also, I'm an Oktéléamamêlnénana‑li Otmanathë‑li Zéo‑Dêwêl and my néwo‑com‑binathions and shpêll‑ing are var beddër & posith‑ive tʰan yôrs.

Sorry man. Byë. Ciao.

Shalmunathéo‑Shaluth Oléj‑kum. {Dôr is Dôric, Att. is Attic}.

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 02:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

What command to use

Hi, I like the stylized signature that you have. I would like to use Andalus fonts vor a part of my signatune but I don't know the command, I copied & paste the command in preference :

<font size="3"< <span style="font-family:Andalus Text MT;color:black"<ZZZ</span<</font<

But it not vork...

How should I do ? What is the exact command ?

Tʰang. Good day.

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مأنجزهدي (talk) 09:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

@Nemzag: -Hi, I'm not sure if you have already figured it out but here it is. You were making a simple error of always using a left angle bracket. Please try this code, <font size="3"><span style="font-family:Andalus Text MT;color:black">ZZZ</span></font> to make "ZZZ" appear as "ZZZ". Good luck and happy editing Wikipedia! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 15:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, no I not making an error with left bracket, but I use it, to cancel the command displaying in this page, since I don't know to use template like you by using <code< & <nowiki<,... I already tested that command that you show it is not vorking... ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مأنجزهدي (talk) 02:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

@Nemzag: -Do not edit this page. Just copy what appears next to this sentence in between quotation marks, "<font size="3"><span style="font-family:Andalus Text MT;color:black">NEMZAG</span></font>". Anupmehra -Let's talk! 05:34, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I ad‑ded the code line in pre‑fer‑ence signa‑tunë and no it is not vorg‑ing ; tʰang any‑way vor yovr ħêlph, good day... What do you mean by not edit this page ?

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مأنجزهدي (talk) 22:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

@Nemzag: - OKay, try one more time. Copy and paste the following code into your preferences "[[User:Nemzag|<font size="3"><span style="font-family:Andalus Text MT;color:black">ReplaceItWithYourDesiredName</span></font>]] ([[User talk:Nemzag|<font size="3"><span style="font-family:Andalus Text MT;color:black">talk</span></font>]])", and Tick the box below that says, Treat the above as wiki markup. (Do not edit this page to copy the code.) Anupmehra -Let's talk! 22:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Tʰang... But I have an last question, if I want the signature the same font with standard size, but only the Arabic part using 5px how should I do ? I have tried by my own, but the command is to long and the tool don't allow it... Tʰang, good day. Have a long life & be Aïtalévrênanês...

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 05:33, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Nemzag's projects

Nemzag, please store your edits at User talk:Nemzag. I really do not have any need for them here, and the massive amount of them, plus the unending daily edits and re-edits, are drowning my talk page. I’m sure that they will have a good home at [[User talk:Nemzag]. Thanks for understanding. —Stephen (talk) 08:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Ok, Steph‑en, man, and ktʰang vor all & mainly vor yôr pati‑ênth, take care, good day... Don't vor‑geth to tell to pro‑kraph‑ma‑tôr to cor‑rect the size of Arabic‑script dis‑play template in Wiktionary Êngël‑ish... And again sorry vor what have done my "brothers in re‑ligion" even if I don't know tʰem at all... ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Font Question

Hi, Steph‑en, sorry to disturb you...

I have a question because I know that you are a font editor...

Long time ago I have made a font called Aldanaus (to complete Andalus missing character that I use in my Web page), I have done it with a cracked version FontLabs Studio 5...

I imported / opened "Andalus" font in it and I made edit to add missing Arabs character, all is good, but when I use Aldanaus, for an unknown reason the new Arab letter are not linked to the precedent like those who were already present in "Andalus"... There is a little blank space between letter...

My CSS is configured like this :
.Orbi_Grand_Green {
	font-family: Aldanaus, Andalus;
	font-size: large;
	color: #009900;

In my signature if use :
<span style="font-family:Andalus,Aldanaus>ZZZ</span></font> the extra letter appear as isolated...

And if I use :
<span style="font-family:Aldanaus,Andalus>ZZZ</span></font> the letter is linked to previous one but with a blank between letter...

I don't understand why, I have done nothing in option of the fonts to have this behavior, can you help me and advice me for this ?

I don't use & I not installed the cracked version Fontlabs Studio ( http://old.fontlab.com/font-editor/fontlab-studio/ ) because in my new Windows 10 PC, I don't want virus or cracked stuff (and Avast detect a virus in the cracked files) and I don't want to pay 300€ for a tool that I will not use anymore...

What tool do you use to edit fonts ??? My fils is "VFB" format. Can I use your shofth‑varë with it ?

Please ħêlp, tʰang.

If you want to ħêlp me for this file, give me a email to send you the two picture of the graphic bug, and the files (Aldanaus.vfb & Aldanaus.ttf)...

Tʰang, good day. E-mailed question from Nemzag, 7:19 2 October 2015 (UTC)

I don’t know. I have never used Fontlabs Studio 5. The program that I used was called Fontographer 5.2.3 (Mac), but it is no longer supported and it won’t work with more recent versions of Operating Systems. —Stephen (talk) 11:33, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

The software that you use is prôm the same company, may be you can open the vfb file to check and may be you can find a way to correct the graphic bug... Where can I put the VFB & TTF files ?

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مأنجزهدي (talk) 15:33, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

My Fontographer was for the Mac, on 3.5" floppy disks. I no longer have a Macintosh, but only a laptop with Windows 10. My laptop will not accept floppy disks, it requires CD disks. I don't think that computers built today will accept 3.5" floppy disks. —Stephen (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Tʰang vor ħêlph, if you have dhë pro‑qraf Shéri‑al Key, you can down‑load dhë last vêrsi‑ôn of Fontographer prôm homë‑pagë... You don't havë any widea how to rê‑sholvë this graphic bug ? I tʰougʰth tʰat you had an lông ex‑perthisë in fonth edit‑ing that is why I rë‑quest‑éd your adë‑sist‑angë... Tʰang any‑way, good day...

PS : What tool do you usë now with yôvr lap‑top vor fonths edit‑ing ? 

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مأنجزهدي (talk) 18:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

I cannot understand most of what you wrote. I do not know those words.

Fontographer became obsolete 12 years ago when the OpenType font standard came out. The fonts that Fontographer was created for were PostScript and TrueType. The new OpenType fonts were much more complex, and font-makers had to use a series of different independent programs to create fonts in multiple stages. At the same time, computers in those days had only 512 MB of RAM, but 12 years ago the new computers came with much larger RAM, and Fontographer did not recognize the large RAM numbers and would not launch. Because of the complexity of the problem, I stopped working on fonts. Today there are font programs similar to Fontographer that will allow for the creation of a complete font, from start to finish, by using only the one program. I don't know when this font program became available, but the environment for fonts had changed a great deal, and there was now only a limited need for a font-editing program. For these reasons, I never bought the new font programs and have not worked on fonts for the last 12 years. —Stephen (talk) 20:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Ok, tʰang any‑way vor yôvrë kind‑ness. I searchédë vor a good tool long time ago, buth I can't find kumë‑plêthë ônë... Tʰang, good day. ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مانجزهدي (talk) 11:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Long Signature

Nemzag, you have the longest signature I recall seeing on WP in over 6 years of editing. You might want to look at WP:SIGLENGTH. Personally I would suggeat making it a lot shorter. --220 of ^Borg 00:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, 220 of Borg... Well I like my signatune how it is, and I don't think is so long (since it use just one line & 7 terms)... I can remove if I'm obligated the Dôr variant but I prefer to keep it like that, and I want to use the Crêgu & Arabs variant both... I'm using my signatune only on talk‑page, I don't think it is causing trouble in article... What do you think ?

Also it is strange that there is not any mention in "Preference" about this, you allow us to make a signatune with a precise number of character, and after you say it is to long ??? Why do you not show that rule directly in "Preferences" Page ?

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مأنجزهدي (talk) 09:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Fair enough, just advising. It would be a good idea if this was pointed out when editors were creating a 'sig'. Byt the way, have you read WP:INDENT? ::Try using : rather than a space at the start of sentences,

Otherwise your comments look like this.  220 of Borg 12:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Orgb عرب‎ عجب‎ رجب‎ Rgob رجعب‎ 220 of Borg yovr arë dhë Ʒéni‑us, really, very wise and knowing news & making in‑nova‑thi‑ons...

I use a space because I like that my message have that style, using structunized size... I never use "::" I keep the start position & the re‑sponder ":" the third "::" etc... Like that each time one of the talker speek he have the same starting position...

Ktʰangths 帑 كثأنجى‎ כטאנג‎ ܟܛܐܢܓܬ‎ [ktɛng] you, Rêmsi רחמגי‎ רחמשי‎ ܪܚܡܓܝ‎ رحمجي‎ & Rêmgy רחמגי‎  ܪܚܡܓܝ‎ رحمجي‎ vor shar‑ing yovr ën‑ménsu‑nabi‑ale know‑ledge with me... Pêaqë. Ʒood day.

I have the long‑est SIG be‑cause I have the long‑est 隆永 maha‑atman to...

I Want to use the Shkupitar Qrêgu Ante‑ces‑tor Kvrêl Shkripth & the Orbitian one, it is pers‑on‑al and shênthi‑mêntha‑al...

I'm Albanian, Shqypë‑tärë, Shalvé, Qashkaljević (Роман Каскалиевиќ Ashkali أشكالي‎ ܐܫܟܐܠܝ‎ א‑שכאלי‎), Abuddhu عبده‎ & I'm mé‑sholmné م‑شلمنه‎. My signatunë Must shown that, it is my identity, if it was possible I will add the Lathin, Shvriac, Hevrew, Georgian, Kvr‑êl, Deva‑naga vari‑anth to and one day Hanzi & Kata‑kana version...

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مأنجزهدي (talk) 19:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

font question

Hi, Stephë‑enë,

In English Wikipedia the script template for Arabic still not work well سحير‎, this size is minus‑cule, can you contact the administrator in charge of this...

I reported this bug before in your wall (3 September but you erased it).
Since nothing was done to correct this display problem... Is near unreadable you can't allow this Arabic is used by 1.600.000.000 humans... Correct this please...

Thank... emailed comment from User:Nemzag 07:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

I don’t know which admins would be in charge of this. You should never report any bug on my wall, because Wikipedia admins do not watch my page. If you report anything on my talk page, nobody will ever see it. You might ask Mahmudmasri. I see that Mahmudmasri has edited {{Template:Script/Arabic}}. If he cannot help you, I have no idea who you should contact. —Stephen (talk) 01:32, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Ok... ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΕΝΗΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مأنجزهدي (talk) 03:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Tʰang 帑 كتأنجى you, buth I don't have much time in front of me, since I was poison‑ed by psych‑iatrist speci‑al‑ist (ad‑nex neco) in the past, and I feel that I will not live long...

I have done some vork वोरक on Wiktionary Engl‑ish to be bann‑ed arbitrary by a man who even don't know the language that he cor‑rect and that I use, and they e‑rased my Pro‑fil‑page, so no, I will not spend time any‑poly to see my varg cens‑un‑ed & delet‑ed with‑out any re‑ward to help a dictatory (Oaél عاهل‎ vrom Orél عرهل‎ ورهل‎ & Petrosyan) of falsi‑fica‑ti‑on & de‑forma‑ti‑on.

Also I need a job, and spend‑ing time on this kind of activities with‑out any salary is not in‑ter‑est‑ing vor me...

ΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣΟΣ (dôr.) ΤϷΗΝΑΝΑΘΕΣΟΣ (att.) ΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜ ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔΙ / طشأنانثس أعليهوسعلۋ مأنجزهدي (talk) 04:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

What is ק׳?

I noticed this edit of yours. What language is ק׳ used in? It's certainly not used in any Hebrew script language I have ever heard of. --- Wikitiki89 (talk) - 20:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

→⊕⊕⊕ JNË - ين
→⊕⊕⊕ ÃLNABI‑ANË - ألنبىِ‑ان
→⊕⊕⊕ ÃLBË‑ANIË‑ANË - ألب‑انىِ‑ان
→⊕⊕⊕ AƩKÃLIË - اشكألىِ
→⊕⊕⊕ ƩKY‑YPIË - شكۈ‑ۈڡىِ
→⊕⊕⊕ ĨƩKOZÊNUÔNOΘË - إشكعزحناُغنعث
→⊕⊖⊕ ÕKYPË‑TÉRË - غٴقۈڡ‑طار
→⊕⊖⊕ ĦÊTƩË‑ƩɕȲPË‑TÂRΘWË - حطش‑شݭۈڡ‑طارثوى :

D.	Ʃ.	A.	Ħ.	Q.	C.	D.	B.	I.P.A
G. Qrêgwë‑anë قرحگو‑ان Gég‑ôn‑istë گهگ‑غن‑اِسط Ʃɕypë شݭۈڡ	TQ	طݭ‎	טק׳‎	ΤϘ΄	Ћ	त्ष्	ㄐ	[tɕ]
G. Qrêgwë‑anë قرحگو‑ان Gég‑ôn‑istë گهگ‑غن‑اِسط Ʃɕypë شݭۈڡ	Q	ݭ‎	ק׳‎	Ϙ΄	Ҫ	ष्	ㄒ	[ɕ]
T. Romë‑anë ررعمم‑ان Tōskǐ‑ʃtë طعسك‑اِشط Ʃtɕipë شطݭاِڡ	Q	طݭ‎	טק׳‎	ΤϘ΄	Ћ	त्ष्	ㄐ	[tɕ]
Ʒ. Êvrôfwë حۋشرغفسوى Ʒêʒë‑ũnë‑jʃθë ژحژ‑أُن‑يشث Ʃɕôpë شݭۉڡ	TQH	طݭ‎	טק׳‎	ΤϘ΄	Ћ	त्ष्	ㄐ	[tɕ]
Ʒ. Êvrôfwë حۋشرغفسوى Ʒêʒë‑ũnë‑jʃθë ژحژ‑ؤن‑يشث Ʃɕapë شݭاَڡ	QH	ݭ‎	ק׳‎	Ϙ΄	Ҫ	ष्	ㄒ	[ɕ]
Ʒ. Êvrôfwë حۋشرغفسوى Ʒêʒë‑ũnë‑jʃθë ژحژ‑أُن‑يشث Tʃëɕëpë طشاْݭاْڡ	Q	ق‎	ק‎	Ϙ	Ҁ	क़	?	[q]

ͰΑΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣ‑ϒΣ (dôr.) ΗΤϷΑΝΑΝΘΕΣ‑ΟΣ (att.) ͿΗϷΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜƏ Α̃ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔͿƏ / حطشأنانثس يشأعليهوسعلۋ أمنجزهدي (talk) 19:08, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nemzag. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Stewart

Ħêllô, shalem shaluthe, administrator & bureaucrat Stephen G. Brown,
I'm Nemzag, can you give me a link to a Stewart, because I want my bban ببان‎ [R‑0668] ("separation, inimity, division, disunion, discord.") in Wiktionary to be simply removed, because he was abusive & injust (Article 19 of U.N. Human Rights)...
Or at least to be able to P.M. other's administrator's and edit "Talk Page's" to ask pro an edit pro term's
I'm bored to make edit's anonymously, who are not recorded as made by me, and to backup & register them by my own, in a list, on my WebPage.
It's quite a waste of time...
Help me thank you...
Ciao.
ͰΑΘϷΑΝΑΝΑΤΕΣ‑ϒΣ (dôr.) ΗΤϷΑΝΑΝΘΕΣ‑ΟΣ (att.) ͿΗϷΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜƏ Α̃ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔͿƏ / حطشأنانثس يشأعليهوسعلۋ أمنجزهدي (talk)  03:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Nemzag. User talk:RadiX is a steward who speaks Albanian. There are other stewards listed here: m:Stewards. —Stephen (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Ħêllô حللغ & Ħoly حعلي Olleh علله, Stephen G. Brown.

Tʰang تانج you pro giving me these information's,
I'm glad that he speak little bit Albanian and that he have attained such a high position in hierarchy of WikiFoundation, soon when I have time, I will contact him, because I'm busy since I'm going to high school to learn Web Dewelopment (H‑T.M.L., C.S.S., C.M.S., Server Script : P.H.P., S.Q.L. {MySQL, PostGreSQL}, Client Script JavaScript, jQuery, Design, FrameWork) pro my "TaoCodex project" who is my T.F.E. {Trawalië dë fĩnë dë Êtudë}, that I told you about, a long time ago, I succeeded the first year, and know I learn client script's & ob‑ject prog‑ramma‑tion's.

But still, in my case, I would also like to contact a Muslim Stewart, because I'm sure that is the real reason of my bban (adding sourced old Albanian term's, with Persian, Hindi, Arabic/Hebrew & Greek origin abusively, systematically & absurdly reverted), do you have any in your Wiki‑Foundation ? Because I know that the ancient Russian American executive director Lila Tretikov, is not anypoly in command & that a new one (Katherine Maher) is in charge and that she learned Semitic language, so maybe be now, you have recruited Arab or Muslim in Wiki‑administration ?

And I would like to talk with any of these Stewart's & Wizard's… About the trouble that I have with some admin's & user's :

• reverting sourced information (I call that vandalism),
• reverting correct cognating & related term's (I call that dissimulation / censure),
• reverting Gheg sourced dialect variation's (I call that cultural patrimony destruction).

And this without having any knowledge of it and even of the standard Albanian {according to their Babel panel}, and preventing me to use this cool & practical interface, like anyone else in this Woldr, pro unknown, ethnic, religious & abusive reason's, when I made donation's, so I want to regulate this situation… Before I take action in tribunal as I said before, because now I found two advocate's {specialist of media's legislation's] and I'm looking in what direction this request will go, before I deposit my complain, I will also write a article in my WP explaining some abusive block & revert on anonymous I.P. (V.P.N. ?)
They should not waste their time reverting true information's, using always the same "summary" : "If you think this rollback is in error, please leave a message on my talk page.", because they don't have any plausible argument's, it's so boring like in ushtar and I don't want to talk with them because it's a spend of time to try to convince thick‑headed & hide‑bounded individual's.
My apology…

Ciao. Peace !
ͰΑΘϷΑΝΑΝΑΤΕΣ‑ϒΣ (dôr.) ΗΤϷΑΝΑΝΘΕΣ‑ΟΣ (att.) ͿΗϷΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜƏ Α̃ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔͿƏ / حطشأنانثس يشأعليهوسعلۋ أمنجزهدي (talk) 16:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes, there are Muslim Stewards, such as User talk:علاء, User talk:HakanIST, and User talk:Mardetanha. I can assure you that there is no religious bias. If there were any bias or bigotry of a religious nature, it would more likely be against Christians, but even the Christians are tolerated if they follow the rules and don't cause trouble. —Stephen (talk) 02:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nemzag. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)