NeoChrono Ryu

Perpich Center for Arts Education

Thanks for wanting to add content to this article, but I'm afraid that I've had to remove it (it's still retrievable, using the History tab). First, you've presented it in a way that goes against the Wikipedia Manual of style (for example, using level-one section headings), and secondly, you've expressed it in the first-person plural, so that it reads like a prospectus rather than an encyclopædia article. Please feel free to replace it (so long as it isn't copied from a prospectus), but do so in a way that fits Wikipedia, and that reads like an article. You'll find some useful links above. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:18, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Signing Discussion Page Comments

Please sign discussion page comments. You can use four tildes to automatically do this for you. ~~~~ Also, please don't remove material from your talk page. It looks like you are hiding it. When the page gets too long, you can create an archive page by making a slash name, i.e. User talk:NeoChrono Ryu/Archive1. Hu 01:51, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Miyamoto Musashi

You removed the book from the references because you claimed the article and the book are not in agreement. Which do you think is better? The article or the book? By removing the book reference, it seems you think the article is more accurate than the book. Hu 01:51, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

I apologize if it seemed that I was pointing out the article as a better resource that the book. I think the book is better by far, but I do not think that it should be cited if it is not used as a resource. I think that the entire article needs a complete rewrite, using this book as a main refrence, since it is one of the first of its kind, to give a complete and thourough biography of Musashi. I simply do not have the time to devote myself to such a project right now, but if the article is still in need of correction, perhaps this summer I will attempt a total rewrite. NeoChrono Ryu 01:10, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. No apology needed, I was just trying to sort things out. My inclination would be to leave the book in the list of references because it is good. That way an interested party is more likely to track it down and fix the discrepancies without requiring you to rewrite the article. Hu 01:16, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

I had considered that, but I am just afraid that people will simply accept the book as a valid resource for the article, when the articel actually disagrees with much of the information in the book. In short, the book is valid, and I don't want it's validity to rub off on a semi-false article. I suppose I will have to correct it myself, eventually. NeoChrono Ryu 01:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gichin_Funakoshi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gichin_Funakoshi.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 09:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Nakayama_Masatoshi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nakayama_Masatoshi.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 19:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Council of National Unity

[1] What needs to be verified? Halibutt 12:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Shotokan

Please help me on the Shotokan page. ron Southwick 15:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.Loom91 18:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Markup used to flag fact source required

Hi, could you explain to me the convoluted markup you added to Menstrual cycle of: <sup title="Needs citation">< nowiki >[< /nowiki >[[Wikipedia:Citing sources|''citation needed'']]< nowiki >]< /nowiki ></sup><includeonly>[[Category:Articles with unsourced statements]]</includeonly><noinclude>. Why not have used the simpler: {{fact}} [[Category:Articles with unsourced statements]]  ? David Ruben ^Talk 01:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Minnesota meetup

A meetup of Wikipedians in Minnesota is proposed: please stop by the discussion page if interested. Jonathunder 23:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Minnesota Meetup

---

2009

Proposed date: Saturday, October 10.
Details under discussion.

Please share this with anyone who may be interested.

---

Delivered by Jonathunder (talk) 22:33, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Space Jockey (Alien) for deletion

The article Space Jockey (Alien) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Jockey (Alien) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Freedom of choice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freedom of choice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom of choice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

SPECIFICO talk 19:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NeoChrono Ryu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)