User talk:NerriTunn/Archive 3

Please take another look

Hi NerriTunn,

I don't think my first comments on changing my vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Middle School were as clear as they could have been. Please take another look at the discussion. Thanks. Noroton 05:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Ahh, I understand now. Thanks for the explanation. It does seem a bit late to take the originally appropriate route now however, since it's evolved into a full-fledged AfD discussion. I did leave a message on T's user page cautioning about WP:POINT, but I've done this before too: defended an article, but once realizing the strong argument against it, found other articles that should be nominated as well for the same reasons that changed my mind about the article I was originally defending. User:NerriTunn (talk) 06:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Your behavior

Stop threatening other users [1] and engaging in personal attacks [2] or I will block you again. Your behavior is unacceptable on Wikipedia. If you want to continue editing here, please read and abide by our policies on no personal attacks and civility. | Mr. Darcy talk 19:11, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

And don't make legal threats against Wikipedia or other editors. | Mr. Darcy talk 19:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

OK, I've unblocked you, per assume good faith and my hope that you'll cease your edit-warring on articles related to bisexuality. If you're willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, you're welcome to continue editing here. | Mr. Darcy talk 01:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. Let me know if I can be of further assistance. PS posts like this one are likely to earn you another block, for violating the no personal attacks policy (by insulting other editors). Please be more courteous in your dealings with other editors. | Mr. Darcy talk 02:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: List of heteroflexibles

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that List of heteroflexibles meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of heteroflexibles. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. | Mr. Darcy talk

Welcome!

Hello, NerriTunn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Akradecki 15:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

West 49

Your changes did the trick. I've changed my vote to keep. Thanks, and good work! Realkyhick 16:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use

Regarding your question on the help desk: Don't forget that the logo template requires you to post a fair use rationale as detailed in Help:Image_page#Fair_use_rationale. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the guidance. How does this look now: Image:West-49-logo.jpg? User:NerriTunn (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Editing user talk pages

Be sure to sign everything by typing (~~~~) after your comment you put into user talk pages, espcially warnings. That way it also will show what time the warning was given.Inter16 12:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Twinkle

Thanks, I'll look into that. I certianly WANT to warn vandals, but doing it manually takes up way too much of my time, as I edit alot of pages everyday. Something like that would be a great help, if it does not place too much of a load on my old comp. THanks again.

I tried it out on a vandal's edit, but I kept getting a script error. I'm running IE6 on WIn XP, so I'm guessing Twinkle is not ready for that browser. Do you know of a tool similar to Twinkle that works on IE, preferably IE6? My comp can't run IE7 without crashing at odd times, and I'm used to IE, really didn't like any other browser I've tried. Thanks. - BillCJ 05:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Ah.. that's unfortunate. I just noticed that on the Twinkle page, it actually says that the scripts are only verified to work with Firefox and Opera. There are a few other scripts in the same category as Twinkle, but I haven't used them, so I don't know if they are as nice as I find Twinkle to be. They're listed here: Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Rollback scripts. It doesn't seem like they do the same kind of thing as Twinkle though. I asked the question at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Twinkle-like script that works on Internet_Explorer. Hopefully somebody can point you in the right direction. The other obvious option is using Firefox, but that seems a bit much of a change just to get a script working. User:NerriTunn (talk) 05:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

THanks for checking on options for me anyway. If I have to, I could run Firefox simultaneously with IE, using IE for the majority of my edits. WHen I find a vandal's edit, I could copy the diff itno Firefox, and use the Twinkle features there. I'll try it out on my back-op OS, and see if it works the way I think it would. Still, I'd ratehr have something integrated with IE, but I guess we'll see what happens. Thanks again. - BillCJ 06:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Bugatti Veyron

I've completely reverted the page to the last fine copy of it (edit prior to all that vandalism). :) Thanks for your revisions, too, Polymerbringer. --Qwerty (talk) 16:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

'sokay. Thanks again. --Qwerty (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

HBC Archive Indexerbot

Good morning! I noticed that you opted in for the HBC Archive Indexerbot, but didn't create the index page specified in your opt-in with the <!-- HBC Archive Indexerbot can blank this --> permission for the bot to blank. I've gone ahead and created this for you, and the bot should write your index next time it runs (in about 12 hours). Please feel free to let me know here or on my talk page if you have any problems or questions about the bot. —Krellis (Talk) 15:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Reply to your *charming* message

Oh, don't worry, I don't feel inferior to you. I don't need to use sockpuppets to get my way - rational argument seems to work best for me. :) But I'm sure one day an actual person will agree with you. One day. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 10:13, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey you

If you continue making uncivil comments that border on harassment on Dev920's talk page, you will be blocked from editing. I promise you I will do my best to make that happen. Consider this a friendly warning. Jeffpw 11:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Final warning for this edit. Garion96 (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Block

I've issued a 24 hour "timeout" block of your account. Comments like this after you've "left" this account are clearly not intended to further the objectives of building an encyclopedia here. If you do decide to come back, I'd suggest toning down the rhetoric a bit. If you are having issues with other editors, there is a whole host of dispute resolution avenues available.--Isotope23 18:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)