User talk:NeverTry4Me/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

→

Archive 20

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seer Jagir has been accepted

Seer Jagir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

The use of the word "fake" in formal procedures

I'm reading Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shazia Wajahat (2nd nomination) and see you describe a citation as "fake". Later in the same procedure, you disparage a comment by another editor for not understanding you were referring to the citation and not the source. Your arguments might be better understood if you were using better descriptive wording. I would recommend using wording which allows you to make your point on the first pass (and without disparaging others for not understanding your IMHO poorly described point). I'm not saying you're wrong or acting badly. I'm suggesting you use more precise description in order to make your assertion more clear. BusterD (talk) 02:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

BusterD Thank you for notifying me. I have corrected the wording. Regards- _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 07:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Semkhor has been accepted

Semkhor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bahbari has been accepted

Bahbari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darrangamela has been accepted

Darrangamela, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 23:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)