FAE grp

edit

Can you please explain why you removed this information? >> Lil-unique1 (talk)21:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Nevknocklife, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to FAE grp does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  >> Lil-unique1 (talk)21:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Removal of content at FAE grp

edit

  Hello, Nevknocklife. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. >> Lil-unique1 (talk)23:14, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


Your edit here has been reverted because you have failed to explain it. You state that it is "not factual or fair representation of the company", however the lawsuit was a factual event, which is sourced by reliable industry sources.

Sarah even provided a statement saying that the organisation was disputing the contents of the lawsuit. The page on wikipedia reports the facts that the lawsuit happened, Lil Peep's mother holds the company responsible but that no decision has yet been made. By removing this content you are showing bias and a lack of a neutral point of view.

The information is completely neutral neither reflecting well or badly on the organisation. Similarly, it is noteworthy to mention that a former employee was charged with sexual assault. Similar to how the BBC has not removed mentions of Jimmy Saville or Tim Westwood despite them also being involved in similar scandals.

I am sorry you feel otherwise but we do not censor material that you simply don't like. It seems like you have a connection to the organisation, if you do you need to read our guidelines on conflict of interest. If you continue to remove sourced and reliable content you may be blocked or banned from editing. >> Lil-unique1 (talk)22:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply