Newcentre

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jute. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 13:24, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Vellaippan Velayudam Thanga Thirupathy

Hello, I can see you've put a lot of work into Vellaippan Velayudam Thanga Thirupathy, but I can't tell if he is notable by Wikipedia's standards. There are many links to sites related to patents, but that is not sufficient to make him notable. The only link to a secondary source (https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6EWg7JOayyTaHl6QUZxamRzX2s/edit?usp=sharing) seems to be a scan of a magazine article. Nadar Peedam does not have obvious signs of being a reliable source.

I don't know your relationship to the subject of the article, but I hope you won't be offended when I say that the inventions and patents do not seem to be practical or mainstream. The one patent linked which actually shows the content of the patent is bizarre.

If there is not other evidence of his notability, I may submit this article to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. I'm hoping you can find reliable sources, either in English or which can be translated, which make that unnecessary. Thank you, SchreiberBike talk 06:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Mr.SchreiberBike, Thanks for your points and suggestions, for improving the Page. The Link referred by you as "Bizarre" related to United States Patents and Trademarks Office and Mr.Thanga Thirupathy's patent has been published, due to his notable contribution. There are other Links, shown under the "References" to substantiate his contribution in the field of inventions. Hope this justification will suffice. If you further require the copy of Invention Certificate issued by Patent authorities, please suggest where to Email the copies of the Certificates suitably

Thanks Newcentre for your quick reply. My concern is that many people have patented something, but are not notable. Other reliable sources need to show notability by Wikipedia's standards. As you can see from United States Patent and Trademark Office#Criticisms, patents can be issued for things which are bizarre. Having received a patent does not make one notable. SchreiberBike talk 07:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

May the patent Certificate page issued by USPTO to Mr. Thanga Thirupathy carrying the patent number be uploaded for authentication please

I'm not sure what you mean above. The patent seems to be real - the question is whether the Thanga Thirupathy is notable by Wikipedia's standards. Thanks, SchreiberBike talk 19:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Vellaippan Velayudam Thanga Thirupathy deletion discussion

Newcentre, I have proposed the deletion of the above article. There will be a discussion, which you should participate in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vellaippan Velayudam Thanga Thirupathy. SchreiberBike talk 05:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)