Recent edit to Richard Desmond

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Richard Desmond, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Many of the citations you removed are far from tabloid journalism. Discuss removal on talk:Richard Desmond per wp:BRD. See help:talk pages Jim1138 (talk) 07:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stirling Marathon (October 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, NewsEditor1959! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Stirling Marathon concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stirling Marathon, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Stirling Marathon

edit
 

Hello, NewsEditor1959. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stirling Marathon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Atlantic306 (talk) 18:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020

edit
 

Hello NewsEditor1959. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Richard Desmond, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NewsEditor1959. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NewsEditor1959|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 11:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 17:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello NewsEditor1959. Please take note of what Smartse has advised above, and please do not abuse the "Minor Edit" tag - see here: WP:MINOR. Also, have a look here: WP:SPA. You are clearly not in a position to edit this article in a neutral fashion, so with all respect, please do not make further edits to it. Springnuts (talk) 10:53, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --SmartSE (talk) 08:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, NewsEditor1959. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Richard Desmond, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Love to talk with you!

edit

Hi, I'm the editor of WP:Wikipedia Signpost and I hope to publish an article about the Wikipedia article on Richard Desmond. If you'd like to talk to me, please email me here.

All the best,

Smallbones(smalltalk) 20:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply