Nieuwenhuis

Speedy deletion of "Revolution Money"

A tag has been placed on "Revolution Money" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 16:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Revolution money

A tag has been placed on Revolution money, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Revolution money and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hitrohit2001 (talk) 16:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Hitrohit2001

Adoption

Hi,

Sorry for replying so late, usually i am quicker.

I suppose that you wanted to ask me about notability and speedy deletion tags on Revolution money. I see now that the article has been improved and doesn't have these tags anymore.

On Wikipedia articles must be about notable topics. See Wikipedia:Notability about it.

For Wikipedia deletion policy see Wikipedia:Deletion policy.

One last thing: so sign your name, you need to write the four tildes together, not separated by spaces. Like this: ~~~~.

Feel free to contact me again if you need any help. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 08:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Amir, Thanks for your response. One other question. Trying to capitalize "Money" in the title Revolution money, and to delete the other "Revolution Money" page. Can you please advise how this can be done? Best, Sharon Nieuwenhuis (talk) 14:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 14:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

You actually want to rename a page, not to delete it. This action is usually called "moving" in Wikipedia. To move a page, use the "move" tab at the top of the article. See Help:Moving a page and Wikipedia:Requested moves for full details.

In this particular case of Revolution money and Revolution Money there is another complication: both of these articles exist and have histories, so they need to be merged. Currently the article at Revolution money appears to be the complete and correct one. Please let me know whether this is correct, so i would complete the merge.

Another important piece of advice: The custom on Wikipedia talk pages is to continue the discussion on the same talk page where it was started. This helps keeping the discussion together. If you leave me a reply at your talk page, you usually don't need to leave a message on my talk page to draw my attention, as i watch talk pages where i write (see Help:Watching pages). --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Amir,

Thanks for helping to show me the ropes here. There is a lot to learn. You are correct that the article Revolution money is the complete and correct article. In addition to the merge, it also needs a citation after "St. Petersburg, Florida" and I want to link to the St. Petersburg Times article (dated October 27, 2007) there. Can you teach me how? (Or if you are inclined to do it yourself, feel free.) Thanks for much for taking care of the merge. Do you need anything further from me? Best, Sharon Nieuwenhuis (talk) 17:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I completed the merge.

You don't need to add a citation for verification about St. Petersburg, Florida, because a link to the St. Petersburg Times article already appears at the bottom. This means that you can remove the "citation needed" thing. To do this, edit the article and delete the {{fact... thing. It is a very common template for marking potentially dubious passages; for an explanation about this particular template, see {{Fact}}, and for an explanation about templates in general, see Help:Template. If you don't understand it right away, don't feel too bad - it took me months to understand it :)

You can make the citation nicer by converting it to a footnote, but it is not necessary or urgent. If you want to try it out, see Help:Footnotes.

One last little thing: to make a discussion on a talk page look like a thread, indent your replies by adding a colon (:) at the beginning of every paragraph. Just edit this talk page and see how i did it. Two colons indent further, etc. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 22:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Vines of Mendoza

A tag has been placed on The Vines of Mendoza, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 02:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Please read the CSD tag; this is not about notability, it is about the tone of the article. As you have previously been warned, do not remove the tag. Ironholds (talk) 10:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from The Vines of Mendoza, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page Thank you. Anna Lincoln 11:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Status and Advice

As reviewing administrator, I had to delete the article, because it was essentially promotional, being primarily directed at urging people to buy plots of land there. It is possible that a suitable article might be written but you need to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases). You also need to write like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise yourself, say what you do. Remember not to copy from your web site -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. For further information see our FAQ about businesses, organizations, and articles like this. Try to write as try andi nformative an article as possible, without adjective or praise, or details about buying a share in the property, or the advantages of doing so. DGG ( talk ) 23:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

It's about time you were welcomed

Welcome!

Hello, Nieuwenhuis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Anna Lincoln 09:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

I replied on my talk page. Anna Lincoln 09:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Adoption

Greetings Nieuwenhuis, I see you're up for adoption, and I'm in the market. You appear to have been adopted once before by Amir E. Aharoni, plus now informally by Anna Lincoln. I'll respond to your adoption request officially, but really I'm just another helping hand. If ever you need advice or answers, just ask me -- any question, any time. I'd like to help however I can. Happy editing - Draeco (talk) 03:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/face2face was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 03:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/face2face. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  21:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

TB

Hello, Nieuwenhuis. You have new messages at Happysailor's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Nieuwenhuis. You have new messages at DeltaQuad's talk page.
Message added 00:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Overview

Launched in August 2010, ScuttlePad is a social network designed exclusively for children aged 6-11 years old. Users add friends, upload photos and update statuses through pre-defined word lists. It is a self-funded venture based in Utah.

After his tenure as a Boy Scouts Cub master, Chad Perry saw kids using Facebook and spent nine months studying how they used it. He came upon the idea to create ScuttlePad because many of his cubs were unsafely updating their statuses and were also under the age limit for Facebook.

Background

ScuttlePad was created to be an educational social network for kids under 13 years old, the required age for most social networks, as many kids use Facebook and MySpace before they turned the required age because of the lack of alternatives.

Recent studies have shown the increase in use of social networks among children under the required age for registration. A quarter of children between ages 8-12 have joined Facebook, according to studies. Underage children on social networks without safeguards are susceptible to cyberbullying and online predation. Forms of cyberbullying include harassing emails, instant messages, Facebook chats or Facebook wall posts.

How ScuttlePad Works

Users require a parental email address and answers to security questions to create a profile. Users create profiles and upload photos. Members can add friends and communicate using pre-defined word lists. All photos are manually reviewed by ScuttlePad management.

Adults may not join ScuttlePad , but can use the site in a supervisory role with their children.

ScuttlePad offers basic social networking, including user photos and status updates, and communication among users .

Security

ScuttlePad’s pre-defined word lists prevent profanity from being on the site. Users have seen the sentence construction as a game. The word lists may produce nonsensical statuses but block swearing and offensive language. Profanity among teens on social networks is common due to the unfiltered nature of communication. Nearly 20 percent of school teachers have reported that their students have used inappropriate language.

ScuttlePad was designed to exceed Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) guidelines. The act applies to websites and online services and details what the site’s responsibilities are to protect children’s privacy and safety online. The act also determines the restrictions on marketing to children under the age of 13. In 2006, Iconix, which owns Candie’s and Mudd was charged with violating the COPPA and paid a civil penalty. The Federal Trade Commission also filed complaints against online retailer Amazon.com regarding COPPA.

External Links

www.ScuttlePad.com

Competitors

Togetherville
Club Penguin
Webkinz

Category:Web 2.0

Category:Social networks

Category:Social networking language education websites

Category:Community websites

Category:Internet properties established in 2010

Category:Virtual communities

Category:Companies based in Utah

Category:Privately held companies of the United States

ScuttlePad

Nieuwenhuis (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Overview

Launched in August 2010, ScuttlePad is a social network designed exclusively for children aged 6-11 years old. Users add friends, upload photos and update statuses through pre-defined word lists. It is a self-funded venture based in Utah.

After his tenure as a Boy Scouts Cub master, Chad Perry saw kids using Facebook and spent nine months studying how they used it. He came upon the idea to create ScuttlePad because many of his cubs were unsafely updating their statuses and were also under the age limit for Facebook.

Background

ScuttlePad was created to be an educational social network for kids under 13 years old, the required age for most social networks, as many kids use Facebook and MySpace before they turned the required age because of the lack of alternatives.

Recent studies have shown the increase in use of social networks among children under the required age for registration. A quarter of children between ages 8-12 have joined Facebook, according to studies. Underage children on social networks without safeguards are susceptible to cyberbullying and online predation. Forms of cyberbullying include harassing emails, instant messages, Facebook chats or Facebook wall posts.

How ScuttlePad Works

Users require a parental email address and answers to security questions to create a profile. Users create profiles and upload photos. Members can add friends and communicate using pre-defined word lists. All photos are manually reviewed by ScuttlePad management.

Adults may not join ScuttlePad , but can use the site in a supervisory role with their children.

ScuttlePad offers basic social networking, including user photos and status updates, and communication among users .

Security

ScuttlePad’s pre-defined word lists prevent profanity from being on the site. Users have seen the sentence construction as a game. The word lists may produce nonsensical statuses but block swearing and offensive language. Profanity among teens on social networks is common due to the unfiltered nature of communication. Nearly 20 percent of school teachers have reported that their students have used inappropriate language.

ScuttlePad was designed to exceed Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) guidelines. The act applies to websites and online services and details what the site’s responsibilities are to protect children’s privacy and safety online. The act also determines the restrictions on marketing to children under the age of 13. In 2006, Iconix, which owns Candie’s and Mudd was charged with violating the COPPA and paid a civil penalty. The Federal Trade Commission also filed complaints against online retailer Amazon.com regarding COPPA.

External Links

www.ScuttlePad.com

Competitors

Togetherville
Club Penguin
Webkinz

Category:Web 2.0

Category:Social networks

Category:Social networking language education websites

Category:Community websites

Category:Internet properties established in 2010

Category:Virtual communities

Category:Companies based in Utah

Category:Privately held companies of the United States

Michael H. Evans

Michael Evans

Evans had long been passionate about wine and spent much time in the Napa Valley, and other vineyards throughout the world. Inspired by the quality of the wines, and intrigued by Mendoza’s wine culture in the midst of meeting his current business partner Pablo Gimenez Riili, Evans began researching the land with hopes to provide a different kind of experience to Mendoza, a high quality, tourist-friendly wine destination and enterprise.

With Riili, Evans raised money from friends and family and purchased 900 acres of land in the Uco Valley, and created The Vines of Mendoza’s unique Private Vineyard Estates. They've since sold parcels to more than 65 owners from around the globe.

Evans and Riili also established The Vines of Mendoza Tasting Room, that provides 100 of the highest quality Argentina wines in one location. The Acequia Wine Club and The Vines Online Wine Store also deliver rarely available and best Argentine wines to the United States and Europe.

Prior, Evans was Executive Director of CTIA Foundation, the international association for the wireless telecommunications industry, promoting telecommunications growth in the U.S. He also ran business development for iNetnow, a start-up Web-based concierge service in 2000.

Evans’ entrepreneurial spirit dates back to his college days at Arizona State University, where he developed the concept for a company that alleviated the hassle in auto dealerships’ sales. Evans is also a photographer.

Santiago Achaval

Santiago Background

When approached by Michael Evans and Pablo Gimenez Riili in 2005 to join The Vines of Mendoza, Santiago Achával knew it was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

As The Vines of Mendoza’s Consulting Winemaker, Achával’s office is a tasting room filled with wine samples and bottles awaiting his critical palate. His teachings in the vineyards condense decades of wine expertise into a hands-on experience that enable laymen to experience winemaking from grape-picking through wine production to bottling, extracting the best of the Uco Valley terroir.

Achával, an Argentine living in Cordoba, first became interested in wine after taking weekend trips with friends to the Napa Valley while completing an MBA at Stanford in 1989. There, they tasted fine wines and learned about the winemaking process. After completing his studies, he returned to Argentina and worked five years in a corporation. His free time, however, was spent engaged with the culture of wine, mingling with local experts and expanding his knowledge through research and experimentation.

A decade later, Achával began a new career as the managing partner of Achával-Ferrer, where he discovered how to mix the Italian wine wisdom of his partner with Argentine culture, establishing both the winery and himself at the pinnacle of the industry. Through this relationship, Achaval was able to develop innovative techniques and bring Malbec to international attention in terms of quality and winemaking.

Achával continues to share his knowledge of Mendoza’s wine culture with visitors to the Uco Valley, Mendoza and has been recognized as one of the world leaders in winemaking by Wine Spectator and Robert Parker’s Wine Advocate.

Outside of the vineyard, he enjoys spending time with his family, riding horses, skiing and enjoying the outdoors.

Pablo Gimenez Riili

Pablo Gimenez Riili, born and raised in Mendoza Argentina, has spent much of his life involved in wine production, his family’s business for generations. After starting his career in law and real estate, he returned to his roots and opened the family winery with three of his brothers.

Upon meeting Michael Evans in 2004, Riili discovered an innovative way to combine his real estate and wine expertise to further elevate Mendoza’s status as a premier wine destination. Evans and Riili started a journey that would lead them to create the highest quality winemaking enterprise in the region.

In 2005, Riili and Evans, along with investors, purchased 650 acres of land in the Uco Valley, and created The Vines of Mendoza’s Private Vineyard Estates. Evans and Riili saw the potential of the region.

Soon after, they established The Vines of Mendoza Tasting Room, Acequia Wine Club, and The Vines Online Wine Store to further their mission to bring rarely available, best Argentine wines to the United States and Europe.

Overview

Launched in August 2010, ScuttlePad is a social network designed exclusively for children aged 6-11 years old. Users add friends, upload photos and update statuses through pre-defined word lists. It is a self-funded venture based in Utah.

After his tenure as a Boy Scouts Cub master, Chad Perry saw kids using Facebook and spent nine months studying how they used it. He came upon the idea to create ScuttlePad because many of his cubs were unsafely updating their statuses and were also under the age limit for Facebook.

Background ScuttlePad was created to be an educational social network for kids under 13 years old, the required age for most social networks, as many kids use Facebook and MySpace before they turned the required age because of the lack of alternatives.

Recent studies have shown the increase in use of social networks among children under the required age for registration. A quarter of children between ages 8-12 have joined Facebook, according to studies. Underage children on social networks without safeguards are susceptible to cyberbullying and online predation. Forms of cyberbullying include harassing emails, instant messages, Facebook chats or Facebook wall posts.

How ScuttlePad Works

Users require a parental email address and answers to security questions to create a profile. Users create profiles and upload photos. Members can add friends and communicate using pre-defined word lists. All photos are manually reviewed by ScuttlePad management.

Adults may not join ScuttlePad , but can use the site in a supervisory role with their children.

ScuttlePad offers basic social networking, including user photos and status updates, and communication among users .

Security

ScuttlePad’s pre-defined word lists prevent profanity from being on the site. Users have seen the sentence construction as a game. The word lists may produce nonsensical statuses but block swearing and offensive language. Profanity among teens on social networks is common due to the unfiltered nature of communication. Nearly 20 percent of school teachers have reported that their students have used inappropriate language.

ScuttlePad was designed to exceed Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) guidelines. The act applies to websites and online services and details what the site’s responsibilities are to protect children’s privacy and safety online. The act also determines the restrictions on marketing to children under the age of 13. In 2006, Iconix, which owns Candie’s and Mudd was charged with violating the COPPA and paid a civil penalty. The Federal Trade Commission also filed complaints against online retailer Amazon.com regarding COPPA.

External Links

www.ScuttlePad.com
Competitors

Togetherville
Club Penguin
Webkinz

Category:Web 2.0

Category:Social networks

Category:Social networking language education websites

Category:Community websites

Category:Internet properties established in 2010

Category:Virtual communities

Category:Companies based in Utah

Category:Privately held companies of the United States

Your message at Requests for feedback

	Hello Nieuwenhuis. Replies have been posted to your message at Requests for feedback. Please acknowledge the feedback and ask for additional assistance if you need it. If you do not respond to the feedback, your message and the replies thereto will be archived in a few days. Thank you!
	You can remove this notice at any time - click on this section's [edit] link and remove the section.

Your submission at Articles for creation

face2face, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 08:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ScuttlePad. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 08:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

ScuttlePad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  17:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pablo Gimenez Riili was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  01:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Michael H. Evans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  01:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Santiago Achaval, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  01:28, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pablo Gimenez Riili. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  04:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Pablo Gimenez Riili, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  05:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RichardLaermer was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  15:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Laermer. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. N419BH 23:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Laermer was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sven Manguard _Talk 02:49, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of HotChalk

The article HotChalk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly written article largely written by a WP:SPA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 18:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Vines of Mendoza

The article The Vines of Mendoza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like old WP:PAID article with continued interference from PAID WP:COI. Also does not fulfill WP:Notability. C0nL1ght (talk) 16:51, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C0nL1ght (talk) 16:51, 26 October 2019 (UTC)