Archive This is an archive of past discussions on Nihiltres' user talk page, as archived on September 28, 2021. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Nomination for deletion of Module:Video game dab

edit

Module:Video game dab has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

20:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Whitespace

edit

I just read through the diff at COVID-19 for the last couple of day, and your efforts to normalize the whitespace made it particularly long. I appreciate the other fixes, but I could have lived without the whitespace changes. Could I gently discourage you from doing that (in either direction) in the future, specifically on long and busy articles? WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Normalizing the whitespace in citations makes the citations much easier to read for doing maintenance on them, and aside from muddying the diffs, it's quite harmless. I'm sorry that it made the diff harder to read this time around, but as a large change it's a one-off that makes the article more internally consistent. I'll keep your request in mind—I really appreciate the work you do and I don't want to be a bother—but I'd prefer to keep this tool in my toolbox. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 16:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
    I don't think it makes the wikitext any easier to read for myself, but obviously you do, and others might agree with you. In that particular article, I think that most of the refs will need to be replaced anyway, so I wouldn't have bothered re-formatting them.
    Next month will be the six-month anniversary of Italy declaring its lockdown, and I'm hoping that we'll see some good secondary sources appear then. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
17:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #4

edit

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool

edit
The number of comments posted with the Reply Tool from March through June 2020. People used the Reply Tool to post over 7,400 comments with the tool.

The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.

  • More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
  • Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
  • Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة. ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")[5]

The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).

The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.

New requirements for user signatures

edit
  • The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
  • Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily. Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected. Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures. If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.

Next: New discussion tool

edit

Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

20:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).

Administrator changes

added Eddie891
removed AngelaJcw69Just ChillingPhilg88Viajero

CheckUser changes

readded SQL

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
  • A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors must or should use the articles for creation process.
  • A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.

Arbitration


15:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: August 2020

edit




Headlines
  • Albania report: Wikivoyage edit-a-thon - Editing Albania and Kosovo’s travel destinations
  • Brazil report: Open innovation and dissemination activities: wrapping up great achievements on a major GLAM in Brazil
  • Czech Republic report: First Prague Wiki Editathon held in Prague
  • Estonia report: Virtual exhibition about Polish-Estonian relations. Rephotography and cultural heritage
  • Germany report: KulTour in Swabia and 8000 documents new online
  • India report: Utilising Occasion for Content donation: A story
  • Netherlands report: WMIN & WMNL collaboration & Japanese propaganda films
  • Serbia report: Enriching Wiki projects in different ways
  • Sweden report: Free music and new recordings of songs in the public domain; Autumn in the libraries; Yes, you can hack the heritage this year – online!
  • Uganda report: Participating in the African Librarians Week (24-30 May 2020)
  • UK report: Spanish metal and ...
  • USA report: Wiknic & Black Artists Matter & Respect Her Crank
  • WMF GLAM report: Wikipedia Library, new WikiCite grant programs, and GLAM office hours
  • Calendar: September's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC) 21:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).

Administrator changes

added AjpolinoLuK3
readded Jackmcbarn
removed Ad OrientemHarejLidLomnMentoz86Oliver PereiraXJaM
renamed There'sNoTimeTheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


16:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC) 15:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: September 2020

edit




Headlines
  • Brazil report: Wikidata birthday celebrations, Wiki Loves Monuments, new partnerships and more!
  • Colombia report: GLAM and virtual education
  • France report: AAF training course; Workshops in Strasbourg; European Heritage Days: Rennes; Wiki Loves Monuments
  • Germany report: Ahoy! Wikipedians set sail to document the reality of modern seafaring
  • Indonesia report: New GLAM partnerships on data donation; Commons structured data edit-a-thon
  • Norway report: Students taking on GLAM Wiki women in red
  • Sweden report: Musikverket: more folk music and photos; Hack for Heritage 2020; Wiki Loves Monuments; Wikipedia in the libraries; Digital Book Fair on Wikipedia
  • UK report: National Lottery; Khalili Collections
  • USA report: Virtual events MetFashion, 19SuffrageStories, WikiCari Festival and more
  • Open Access report: New publication about access to digitised cultural heritage
  • WMF GLAM report: Launching Wikisource Pagelist Widget
  • Calendar: ctober's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

16:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Solar System invitation

edit
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's articles related to the solar system. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Solar System? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall coverage of the solar system on Wikipedia. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply 17:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


16:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC) 15:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: October 2020

edit




Headlines
  • AfLIA Wikipedia in African Libraries report: Wikipedia in African Libraries Project
  • Brazil report: Abre-te Código hackathon, Wikidata related events and news from our partners
  • Finland report: Postponed Hack4FI GLAM hackathon turned into an online global Hack4OpenGLAM
  • France report: Partnership with BNU Strasbourg
  • Germany report: Coding da Vinci cultural data hackathon heads to Lower Saxony
  • India report: Mapping GLAM in Maharashtra, India
  • Indonesia report: Bulan Sejarah Indonesia 2.0; Structured data edit-a-thon; Proofreading mini contest
  • Netherlands report: National History Month: East to West, Dutch libraries and Wikipedia
  • New Zealand report: West Coast Wikipedian at Large
  • Norway report: The Sámi Languages on wiki
  • Serbia report: Many activities are in our way
  • Sweden report: Librarians learn about Wikidata; More Swedish literature on Wikidata; Online Edit-a-thon Dalarna; Applications to the Swedish Innovation Agency; Kulturhistoria som gymnasiearbete; Librarians and Projekt HBTQI; GLAM Statistical Tool
  • UK report: Enamels of the World
  • USA report: American Archive of Public Broadcasting; Smithsonian Women in Finance Edit-a-thon; Black Lunch Table; San Diego/October 2020; WikiWednesday Salon
  • Calendar: November's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

15:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC) 17:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

17:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2020

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).

Administrator changes

removed AndrwscAnetodeGoldenRingJzGLinguistAtLargeNehrams2020

Interface administrator changes

added Izno

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


16:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

ISBN determination

edit

Hi Nihiltres, I was just wondering how you determined the ISBN for this edit? Is 9 a default? Thanks, CMD (talk) 03:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I plugged it into the ISBN tool I built (yes, the SSL is broken at the moment) and found that the check digit, incorrect for an ISBN-13, was correct for the ISBN-10 formed by truncating the "978" prefix; the error was almost certainly the result of converting the ISBN from ISBN-10 to ISBN-13 without updating the check digit. While looking up the corrected ISBN in WorldCat, as I usually do, found no results, a web search found that the same source is cited with the valid check digit at Writ of Kalikasan, so it seems safe to assume that the error is solely in the check digit. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 05:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ah, thanks for the info, useful process. CMD (talk) 05:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: November 2020

edit




Headlines
  • AfLIA Wikipedia in African Libraries report: Launch of Wikipedia in African Libraries Project Pilot Cohort
  • Brazil report: Accessibility through audio descriptions, GLAM tutorials, WikidataCon 2021 and more updates on Brazilian GLAMs
  • Canada report: Taking a tour of CAPACOA workshops and some recent example sets from commons
  • Germany report: German symphony orchestra releases audio samples under free license
  • India report: Re-licensing of content on water & rivers in India
  • Indonesia report: #WikiSejarah WPWP Campaign
  • Netherlands report: Wikipedia and Education, Funding granted for two projects in 2021, KB completes collection highlights project
  • Serbia report: GLAM in Serbia makes important steps in the digitization of cultural heritage
  • Spain report: Edit-a-thons on women scientists and painters
  • Sweden report: Music, UNESCO and Wikidata
  • UK report: Hundreds of Khalili images
  • USA report: Black Lunch Table & Museum Computer Network
  • Calendar: December's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

21:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Facts

edit

Just curious to know if you yourself are Catholic?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mchavis (talkcontribs)

No, I'm not Catholic. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 08:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
20:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Your ISBN tool, and Happy/Healthy 2021!

edit

Hi Nihiltres, your super ISBN tool seems to be no longer available. It looks like your account is suspended. I'm already missing it , so I hope you can fix it. I wish you a happy and healthy 2021 . - DVdm (talk) 12:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Nihiltres: It's back online and functioning! Thanks, and enjoy your obvious time off Wiki - DVdm (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Nihiltres: Help, it's back down, alas. It says "Account suspended". - DVdm (talk) 22:35, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
@DVdm: It should be more permanently fixed now (you may need to flush your DNS cache); I was switching hosts. The new host supports Let's Encrypt SSL, which ought to mean that I can now get around to writing some JavaScript for using the tool on-wiki via CORS; the API already provides CORS headers, but they were useless until I had the site switched over. :) {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 03:07, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I had to leave the /prototype/ subpage out. Works perfectly again! - DVdm (talk) 08:50, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Nihiltres: By the way, in the mean while I have created an Autohotkey script to fully automate creating wiki-citations from Google Books urls. I had hoped, using your tool, to be able to also transform their non-hypenated ISBNs into hyphenated form. But the responsetext seems not to include the results. You can also see this when "viewing the page source" of, for instance, this. I see the <!--Active-data block--> and the header <h2>About this ISBN</h2>, but the actual results are missing. Any chance of somehow including the results, so I can GET them with for instance WinHttp.Winhttprequest.5.1, and regex-match the result into my script? - TIA. - DVdm (talk) 10:26, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Nihiltres: Never mind my above request. I found a slightly dirtier way to do it, grabbing the current window content from the screen and regexing. The entire cite book template creation is now fully automated whenever I have a Google Books page open in my browser . Cheers! - DVdm (talk) 13:47, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
@DVdm: The data is retrieved by JavaScript from the API. You can use the API directly to get the data as a JSON object, e.g. https://ataraxic.net/isbn-tool/api.php?input=0123456789 (valid) or https://ataraxic.net/isbn-tool/api.php?input=0123456780 (invalid). That should be much easier than using regex to scrape the page! The /prototype/ page is dead at this point. I used that sub-directory while developing the version that uses the API, so I didn't take the tool down entirely while testing the new version. The previous version was written in pure JavaScript and ran purely client-side … but as the International ISBN Agency says that the RangeMessage.xml file must not be redistributed, and that version bundled a modified version of the file, that version was presumably illegal (whoops). To get around the problem, I developed a version that "hides" the data file server-side and provides only computed results publicly, through a very simple single-function API; that's the current version. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 16:32, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Nihiltres: Ah, much better with the API version. Neat! Thanks a big bunch . - DVdm (talk) 10:41, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


15:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: December 2020

edit




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This Month in GLAM: December 2020

edit




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Editing news 2021 #1

edit

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool

edit
Graph of Reply tool and full-page wikitext edit completion rates
Completion rates for comments made with the Reply tool and full-page wikitext editing. Details and limitations are in this report.

The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.

  • The Reply tool has been deployed as an opt-out preference to all editors at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
  • It is also available as a Beta Feature at almost all Wikipedias except for the English, Russian, and German-language Wikipedias. If it is not available at your wiki, you can request it by following these simple instructions.

Research notes:

  • As of January 2021, more than 3,500 editors have used the Reply tool to post about 70,000 comments.
  • There is preliminary data from the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedia on the Reply tool. Junior Contributors who use the Reply tool are more likely to publish the comments that they start writing than those who use full-page wikitext editing.[73]
  • The Editing and Parsing teams have significantly reduced the number of edits that affect other parts of the page. About 0.3% of edits did this during the last month.[74] Some of the remaining changes are automatic corrections for Special:LintErrors.
  • A large A/B test will start soon.[75] This is part of the process to offer the Reply tool to everyone. During this test, half of all editors at 24 Wikipedias (not including the English Wikipedia) will have the Reply tool automatically enabled, and half will not. Editors at those Wikipeedias can still turn it on or off for their own accounts in Special:Preferences.

New discussion tool

edit
Screenshot of version 1.0 of the New Discussion Tool prototype.

The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[76] You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page.

Next: Notifications

edit

During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

18:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC) 17:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2021

edit




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
Six years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply 17:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

00:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello

edit

Just wanna say hi to a fellow American :) I have a friend from Rockville!


19:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

Administrator changes

added TJMSmith
removed Boing! said ZebedeeHiberniantearsLear's FoolOnlyWGFinley

Interface administrator changes

added AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


17:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2021

edit




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

23:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

edit
16:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Redirect template issue

edit

Could you have a look at Wikipedia talk:Redirect#Redirect hatnote issue. Thanks. MB 20:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for fixing this. So far it has caught around 15 more hatnote errors, some going back 8 years. Since you seem to be quite technically adept, I have another question. I have been monitoring Category:Articles with redirect hatnotes needing review. Often, an article is in this category because the redirect is listed at WP:RFD. In that case, the hatnote really doesn't need review - there is nothing that can/should be done until the RFD is closed, which can take weeks. It would be much more convenient if the module could determine if the reason a redirect did not agree with the hatnote was because of an RFD. If this is possible, then these articles could be listed separately in the tracking category or put into a separate category (e.g. Category:Articles with redirect hatnotes impacted by RFD). That would save me a lot of time. MB 05:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hmm. It's possible, but it would be really ugly to do, because the only way I'm aware to do it involves reading the content of the redirect page. On the one hand, that's labelled an expensive operation and should be used with care, on the other, it's already used by the Module:Redirect functionality that gets the target of a redirect. This is a minor enough problem that I think we ought to wait and see if Extension:CategoryToolbox gets enabled on Wikimedia wikis, because that would be a far cleaner solution. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 16:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Just a thought, "expensiveness" really doesn't matter much since this check would only be necessary at the point of getting to addCategory('Articles with redirect hatnotes needing review') . At that point, is there a way to check if the target title is in Category:All redirects for discussion? I'm not sure if that what you meant by "needing to read the content of the redirect page" (or is doing that exactly what you want to use CategoryToolbox for)? MB 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I think you're right about the order of operations there now that I've thought about it. I've prototyped an update that would test for the presence of "#invoke:RfD" in the redirect page source. Testing for categories would be much harder, as it would require getting the parsed content of the page, which is why I want CategoryToolbox for a long-term solution. This solution is fragile (e.g. it could be maliciously defeated by <!-- #invoke:RfD --> or broken by comments) but it should be good enough to be worth implementing, and in the longer term we can perhaps substitute in better tests once available. I'll need to poke at the tests some more, but it's prototyped, at least. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 18:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

17:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

removed AlexandriaHappyme22RexxS

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration


19:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: March 2021

edit




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

16:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Hatnotes moving to TemplateStyles

edit

Hi! You may be interested in MediaWiki talk:Common.css#Preview warning and hatnotes moving to TemplateStyles. – Uanfala (talk) 00:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

15:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

Administrator changes

removed EnchanterCarlossuarez46

Interface administrator changes

removed Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

Arbitration


15:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: April 2021

edit




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Infobox artwork

edit

Hi, thanks again for the redirect hatnote changes. Everything seems to be working fine. Quite coincidentally, about the time this was going on, I started this discussion which led back to this 7-year-old thread involving you. No one else has worked on it, so I just thought I'd bring it to your attention. MB 22:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

13:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

17:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

17:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

20:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

Administrator changes

added AshleyyoursmileLess Unless
removed HusondMattWadeMJCdetroitCariocaVague RantKingboykThunderboltzGwen GaleAniMateSlimVirgin (deceased)

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

Arbitration


This Month in GLAM: May 2021

edit




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Editing news 2021 #2

edit

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Junior contributors comment completion rate across all participating Wikipedias
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

15:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

16:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
  • An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

Technical news

  • IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

Arbitration