NikhilPatelReal, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi NikhilPatelReal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Awadhiya (caste), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:56, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bharatiya Janata Party, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 22:57, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Caste

edit

Please read User:Sitush/Common#Castelists before you add any more claims of caste identity to articles. I've just had to remove pretty much every one you added to Kurmi and also to the biographies that you linked there. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 04:40, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurmi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaiswar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:NikhilPatelReal reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm JimRenge. An edit that you recently made to B. R. Ambedkar ‎ seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JimRenge (talk) 13:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Lipi Singh

edit

Hello, NikhilPatelReal,

Thanks for creating Lipi Singh! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

I am not sure there is enough here to establish she is really notable, generally we need more then once incident.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 17:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Jaiswar (Kurmi) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Jaiswar (Kurmi), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 21:42, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Jaiswar (Kurmi) concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jaiswar (Kurmi), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kurmi And Patidar Caste Book

edit

Keeping content safe in Wikipedia is a very difficult job. every now and then people come and edit the information unnecessarily. I have faced a lot of problems here. Several important contents were openly removed, many were not given space. Some of these happened wrong fully simply because there are not much Patels who are concerned about the data on Wikipedia due to which other people have become majority and do what ever they want with the content.

So, i am presenting here several links to the main book written on Kurmi Caste and patidar caste. You can visit the link and read the book. You must share it with your friends and have a printed copy with yourself. Please understand the importance of the book.

Link 1: Link 2: Link 3: Link 4: Link 5:

I hope you will download and print the book and spread it to your friends. NikhilPatelReal (talk) 08:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Jaiswar (Kurmi)

edit
 

Hello, NikhilPatelReal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jaiswar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 15:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NikhilPatelReal. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 20:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

NikhilPatelReal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello sir, It seems that there has been mistake that my account has been blocked for sockpuppet reasons. I am completely satisfied by my account and i dont have enough time to create fake accounts. I read yur comments on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NikhilPatelReal. I would like to explain my interest in Bhumi sena and Kurmi article. I am from Kurmi caste hence i have interest in the Kurmi caste related posts. The page Bhumi sena was created by me because wikipedia did not have any information about Bhumi sena. I do edit Kurmi caste related pages sir, but it has been quite a while since i edited Kurmi caste original page. You can yourself check sir, because i did not have anything with reliable source to add. My account which has been blocked is nearly 2 years old and i can do anything with this account, so why will i create fake account? you can see the history of my account, it has no voilations and if there was any warning that was at the beginning when i created my account and i was unfamiliar with wikipedia, now with passage of time i havent recieved any warnings and i havent done any voilations. sir, this accusation of me being a sockpuppet is a mistake. I have no reasons of creating a new account when i am absolutely fine with my current account. I have been making edit in Kurmi article since 2 years, in this time i very well know which content can be added and which cannot be added, that is why you will see that i have not even tried to add anything in Kurmi caste main article in a long period. This accusation of me being a sockpuppet is wrong sir. please remove this acquisition. Thank you. NikhilPatelReal (talk) 22:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

Technical evidence indeed suggests that you are not the same person. Please accept my apologies for the incorrect block. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Feb 2022

edit

Proposed deletion of Lipi Singh

edit
 

The article Lipi Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is well established that IPS officers are not notable, especially the junior ones. This page is also written in a style that amounts to self-promotion as pointed out by other editors.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Narendra PatelK (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply