Nilmerg

Hi. Re: Your edit to Austronesian languages - it should link to the language, not the place. You've changed them to link to the place. I'm going to revert. Secretlondon 11:22, Dec 3, 2003 (UTC)

---

Thanks for fixing the Kirlian photography link in Subtle body. Optim 15:41, 17 Dec 2003 (UTC)

---

Thanks for fixing the typos on my Film-List :-) Fantasy 12:01, 9 Jan 2004 (UTC)

---

Thanks for fixing the link on Duncan Cameron. Could you give an indication of the ways in which you think the article if POV please. You are probably right, when I was originally writing it I found myself actively liking Duncan Cameron when compared with the politicians he was dealing with. It seems as if this may have crept into the article somehow. ping 09:31, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

---

Thanks for spotting those two nonsense articles. Noting them on Cleanup is one possibility to make sure they don't get lost, however the preferred way is to replace the nonsense with {{msg:delete}} - as then they can be found on the What links here list of the article referred by that message. Then they will not be lost even if all admins miss them on Recent Changes or New Pages. andy 14:34, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Duly noted. Thanks. Have to run now. - Nilmerg 14:38, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

---

Thanks for your Talk page message. Imatinib is a fascinating new anticancer drug that's quite different from all other forms of chemotherapy. Instead of blasting all rapidly dividing cells, it actually targets the protein that's leading to the proliferating of the cancer clone. More similar agents are being developed, but imatinib has definitely been a paradigm shift in oncology. The main guy behind it, Brian J. Druker, will one day get the Nobel prize, methinks. Jfdwolff 09:11, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)

PS Nilmerg: I saw you removed the : (colon) in one of the aforementioned redirect pages. Was there anything wrong with it? I've always made redirects with a colon without any trouble!

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Nomination of Human rights violations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Human rights violations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human rights violations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Richard BB 21:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Paso doble listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paso doble. Since you had some involvement with the Paso doble redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)