January 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TonyBallioni (talk) 23:27, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Wikipedia:The Supreme Superior Malevolent Evil Ghost Cabal of Death, Destruction, Darkness, Doom and All Other Negative Adjectives You Can Think Of, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The Supreme Superior Malevolent Evil Ghost Cabal of Death, Destruction, Darkness, Doom and All Other Negative Adjectives You Can Think Of and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:The Supreme Superior Malevolent Evil Ghost Cabal of Death, Destruction, Darkness, Doom and All Other Negative Adjectives You Can Think Of during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ——SN54129 08:42, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-ghost4

edit

 Template:Uw-ghost4 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ——SN54129 11:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NineFiveSeven (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry for everything. I was only trying to brighten people's days with my humor pages and essays, and truly tried to contribute to Wikipedia. I made many mistakes, and want a fresh start. This is on me. I am truly sorry. I just don't want to be accused of being a troll or a sockpuppet when I was never trying to be one. I am sorry, everyone.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your relation to Einkatzeinformatics (talk · contribs)? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Einkatzeinformatics is my friend in real life. I'm sorry I wasn't able to respond sooner, I've just been very stressed out after finding that I was blocked. I'm trying to forget about Wikipedia, because I know there's no way that you'll believe that I am not a sockpuppet or an editor with many honest mistakes. ~~ NineFiveSeven 15:43, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Snow clause

edit

 Template:Snow clause has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Humorous categories

edit

 Template:Humorous categories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Wikipedians in this category has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Wikipedians in this category, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 15:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:100 best ways to get an article deleted

edit

  Wikipedia:100 best ways to get an article deleted, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:100 best ways to get an article deleted and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:100 best ways to get an article deleted during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. J947(c), at 00:15, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NineFiveSeven (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello again. I know this is probably futile, but please listen. I apologize for not being productive and only making joke articles. I sincerely do. As I was questioned previously, I would like to put this in here: Einkatzeinformatics is just my friend in real life. He is not a sockpuppet, and if it appears that he is, we are both part of the Connecticut school system IP, so CheckUser may not work. Again, I do apologize for my past mistakes. If I do get unblocked, I will most likely make a new account for a clean start.

Decline reason:

I see no indication that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia, and plenty of indications that you are not a new editor. Huon (talk) 21:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not the third edit of a user who hasn’t been blocked before. Regardless, the fact that you’ve obviously been blocked in the past or have a previous account that hasn’t been disclosed is the secondary reason for your block. Your only purpose here appears to be to create jokes that aren’t particularly funny. You aren’t here to build an encyclopedia and the number of deletion notices here is a testament to that. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
(talk page watcher) Connecticut school system you say? I actually happen to very familiar with those IP addresses as a recent graduate (w00t). Is there any further details you would like to share about that? Post-secondary or secondary school? –MJLTalk 20:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Also, you probably should've listened to me earlier. –MJLTalk 20:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
I am currently in 9th grade, part of Valley Regional High School. And again, I've been doing a lot of thinking and reading pages, and I really would like to help the project if I do get unblocked. ~~ NineFiveSeven 22:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Also yes, I should have listened to you :P ~~ NineFiveSeven 23:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hm, I have a few follow up questions for you. You're welcome to answer them here or on WP:Discord. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯MJLTalk 06:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
NineFiveSeven, "Einkatzeinformatics is just my friend in real life. He is not a sockpuppet, and if it appears that he is, we are both part of the Connecticut school system IP, so CheckUser may not work. Again, I do apologize for my past mistakes. If I do get unblocked, I will most likely make a new account for a clean start." The classic "we are part of public so checkuser may not work" is OBVIOUSLY a LIE. I request CheckUser to FIND WHETHER this person IS in the Connecticut school ip. {{3125A|talk}} 16:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply