Ninjoust

Mazâre Šarif

Where did Mazâre Šarif come from in your edit to Mazar-i-Sharif? It is not necessarily wrong but needs explanation. Ex nihil ^(talk) 00:20, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

That is the UniPers transcription. —Ninjoust (talk) 01:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Ninjoust, why do you favor UniPers so much? Чибуево Жаңшулокикомев (talk) 16:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Chibuyevo, just because I use it more than others doesn’t necessarily mean I favor it so much. But still, it does have its purpose. —Ninjoust (talk) 01:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Thanks for taking all that time putting the IPA transcriptions for lyrics in various anthem articles! 2620:65:8000:A203:D48:B45C:D15C:A836 (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.11% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for October: Women and disability Healthcare Geofocus: Nordic countries Continuing from month to month: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 10:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alfiya Amirkhanova

Hello, Ninjoust. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Alfiya Amirkhanova, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 17:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Dünýä Nurmämmedowa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dünýä Nurmämmedowa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dünýä Nurmämmedowa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 16:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)