Nitinraajsinha

Speedy deletion nomination of Pankh (Organization)

Hello Nitinraajsinha,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pankh (Organization) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 19:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Nitinraajsinha, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nitinraajsinha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pankh (Organization)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pankh (Organization) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pankh (organisation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pankh (organisation), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:48, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Raja Diva (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miss Raja Diva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miss Raja Diva, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Huon (talk) 09:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

These edits establish a connection between the two accounts, in addition to the shared interests. Comments such as this one indicate that we're likely dealing with undeclared paid editing in violation of the Terms of Use. Huon (talk) 09:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nitinraajsinha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am shocked to see the reasonn for being blocked, what makes you think i have multiple accounts ? this is my one and onkly account and i am a free independent writer on wikipedia, neither i am getting paid for it nor i believe that i am violating any other terms of Wikipedia, the edits that you have mention is a clear edit, the link was found broken as it is the link of a print news paper so we have to upload it on a archive link, i hope that doesnt violates any terms of wikipedia Nitinraajsinha (talk) 19:19, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

So sorry. I cannot unblock you at this time. As this is a sock puppetry block, please see the pertinent section of the WP:GAB. Having examined the available evidence independently, and without an exchange of emails, I share Huon's conclusions regarding sock puppetry and WP:UPE. Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since parts of the evidence are off-wiki, I'm not at liberty to discuss them here. If the above links aren't obvious enough to an administrator reviewing this request, I'll gladly provide a more detailed explanation privately. You can, however, explain why you "really need the page before" some future event concerning the subject "for which" you are creating the page. Huon (talk) 19:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Please go ahead, where do you want to have this private conversation as mentioned by you ? Nitinraajsinha (talk) 20:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Said conversations would be among admins considering your appeal. Preusuably, you know what private information is not being revealed on your talk page.Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Miss Raja Diva concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Miss Raja Diva, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Miss Raja Diva

Hello, Nitinraajsinha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miss Raja Diva".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)