Nivedita tiwari
Welcome!
editHello, Nivedita tiwari, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Role of a media buyer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 10:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Role of a media buyer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Although referenced to a limited extent, this is an essay, not an encyclopaedia article. It is a mixture of sourced material and pure WP:OR
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 10:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Media planning and buying agency has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This is little more than an extended Dictionary Definition, and somewhat of an essay, albeit with references. Much is padding to seek to make it an article. However there is no place on Wikipedia for dictionary definitions.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 10:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Media buying cost has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This is little more than an extended Dictionary Definition, and somewhat of an essay, albeit with references. Much is padding to seek to make it an article. However there is no place on Wikipedia for dictionary definitions.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 10:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Role of a media buyer for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Role of a media buyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Role of a media buyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 11:25, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Your essays
editInstead of removing the PROD, please look at the rationale and improve the articles. All you are achieving is a full deletion discussion where you remove the PROD notices without working in the articles. Fiddle Faddle 11:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Health care public relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Pure Oroginal research even with a reference list. It also smells like a copyright violation
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 11:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Financial public relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Pure Oroginal research even with a reference list. It also smells like a copyright violation
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 11:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Barriers of corporate communications has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Pure Oroginal research even with a reference list. It also smells like a copyright violation
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 11:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
edit
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. I have a very strong suspicion that you are copying and pasting large tracts of text into Wikipedia. This is founded upon the speed of your creation of very long articles formatted for other publications. This is an act which must stop, and stop at once. Fiddle Faddle 11:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Your course
editHi Nivedita tiwari. Based on the contributions that you and several other editors have made today, it seems that you may be a student on a marketing course hwho has been asked to edit Wikipedia as part of your work. It is readily apparent - from your additions and those of your classmates - that your professor has not made any attempt to prepare you for this process, of, if he has, has made some serious errors in doing so. It's important that we get in touch with him to rectify this; as it is, the articles you are creating are going to be deleted and your accounts may well be blocked altogether. We don't want you to fail your course module because your professor has not done the necessary preparatory work, and we have numerous programs in place to help you - however, we need to talk to your professor before things get any worse. Could you please therefore leave a note below identifying your teacher's Wikipedia username (not their email or real name) so that I can contact them and sort things out? Many thanks, Yunshui 雲水 12:45, 30 September 2013 (UTC)