NonResidentFellow

Welcome...

Hello, NonResidentFellow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 七星 (talk) 14:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Stop calling legitimate edits vandalism

You are calling legitimate and reasoned edits vandalism. This is unacceptable behavior. If you will do once more I will asked that you will be blocked. Mashkin (talk) 22:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Your removal of sourced content, without discussing first, is vandalism. Please desist and avail yourself of the discussion pages before attempting to make changes.NonResidentFellow (talk) 23:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

That is not true. You cannot put a "source" next to stuff you insert and say that its removal is vandalism. I refer you to Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. The edits in question violate both WP:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Your behavior violates Wikipedia:Assume good faith and of course Wikipedia:No personal attacks. If you will refer once more to my edits as vandalism I will have to ask that you will be blocked. Mashkin (talk) 23:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Everything I've inserted (and you've removed) is fully sourced to documents at the Israel Lobby Archive. You need to make your case in the discussion page before making radical edits over time to previously agreed to content. Please do not violate the three reverts rule, defend your edits! (and please try to communicate more clearly in English).NonResidentFellow (talk) 23:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

In light of your repeated labeling of "vandalism" I have referred your behavior to Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts. Mashkin (talk) 00:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

note

Please have a read of WP:VANDALISM. "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.", "Avoid the word "vandal". In particular, this word should not be used to refer to any contributor in good standing, or to any edits that might have been made in good faith." Edits made in good faith to improve the article are not vandalism. You must assume good faith and not accuse other editors as this is considered a personal attack and is unhelpful. --neon white talk 07:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. A careful review of the edits, reveals vandalism, followed by accusations of 3RR.NonResidentFellow (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

No, it doesnt, you are required to assume good faith with all editors. Accusations of vandalism are personal attacks and a block may be issued if you continue them. Read the relevant policies as suggested and you may then be able to contribute in a civil way. --neon white talk 21:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

"insertion of nonsense into articles" constitutes vandalism. The subject in question has taken out sourced, recent, authoritative content and substituted it with obscure, aged, and generally low utility content. Please conduct a review. NonResidentFellow (talk) 21:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

3RR Violation

You are aware of the WP:3RR and you have now violated the 3RR rule in American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Please revert yourself immediately. Mashkin (talk) 18:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Actually, you're the one in violation of 3RR. Please stop vandalizing sourced content. The discussion page is the appropriate place to make your case.NonResidentFellow (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

You have again violated the WP:3RR in the article American Israel Public Affairs Committee. I will remind you again to respect wiki policy.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 00:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC))

Please refrain from vandalizing changes to the AIPAC content. If you can refute AIPAC's internal memos, the National Journal, Fortune, etc., please do. But do not tender edits until making a solid case. NonResidentFellow (talk) 00:27,

16 April 2009 (UTC)

Remember "insertion of nonsense into articles" constitutes vandalism.NonResidentFellow (talk) 00:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

That is nowhere near nonsense. This is twisting guidelines too far. --neon white talk 15:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for 3RR violation and abuse of multiple accounts. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

Per a complaint at WP:AN3 about American Israel Public Affairs Committee. EdJohnston (talk) 04:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)