NooProcess
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 2008 February 23. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Speedy deletion of Terrible Tripodism
edit
A tag has been placed on Terrible Tripodism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Toddstreat1 23:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:NooProcess
editUser:NooProcess, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NooProcess and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:NooProcess during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Onorem♠Dil 13:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- I certainly didn't nominate the page out of cruelty. I think you've had plenty of opportunity to hone your skill. Other than your continued placing of non-free images in user space, you appear to have the basics down well enough to venture into the world of actual articles. If you feel the need to further test, you might consider the sandbox. --Onorem♠Dil 23:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)