Noophelia 2.0
Noophelia 2.0, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Noophelia 2.0! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 21 April 2020 (UTC) |
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noometry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Alternate accounts
editHello Noophelia. It's a very interesting topic, but in relation to Wikipedia: I wondered, is this an alternative account of Aeremin? If so, per WP:VALIDALT it should probably be specified on the user page (if not, I'm sorry for suggesting it). Also, do you have a particular relationship with Eryomin or Noometry? Per WP:COI guidelines this should also be specified if so (WP:DISCLOSE). Happy editing, —PaleoNeonate – 17:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
editHi Noophelia 2.0! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)