September 2009

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Muhammad/images for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked. You've been warned about this before and will be blocked again if you continue to introduce unconstructive content to talk pages. Talks there to facilitate constructive discussion relating to the improvement of articles, not general discussion and especially not soapboxing. RaseaC (talk) 12:39, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


  Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RaseaC (talk) 13:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reply

edit

Hi, Firstly, I'm not an administrator. Secondly, your comments on the talk page were not constructive and that's why they were removed, also your arguments were flawed. We don't remove articles because people stop visiting them, infact I would argue that less people visiting an article would mean less vandalism, which is a good thing, so people no longer viewing the article may actually be a good thing. Furthermore your arguments that WP is flawed because of the collaborative effort that makes it is simply flawed, go and do a bit of research and you'll see that WP is generally considered to be as good as the leading encyclopedias out there. So not only was your post irrelevant, it was also flawed in pretty much everything you said, just another reason for it to be deleted. I would also strongly encourage you not to makes threats or attacks on WP. I consider your post on my talk page an attack and you will be warned about it momentarily. Also, threatening to create multiple accounts to disrupt WP (sockpuppetting) will just result in you being blocked in general from WP, not just your account. Thanks, RaseaC (talk) 13:08, 27 September 2009 (UTC).Reply