Not Brit
Barnstar
editHi, Not Brit. You deserve a barnstar.
The Socratic Barnstar | ||
To Not Brit, for a balanced discussion on the merits of Horcrux. Axl (talk) 10:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC) |
- Hey, look at that! I have been editing Wikipedia for years under a different handle (which shall remain secret) and never got one of these things. Three months into my new handle and shazaam! Thanks!
Why the removal
editSo out of curiousity. Why did you get rid of that other user's comments on here a moment ago? Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- REPLY He was repeating comments he had already made in other sections and the reply belonged in those sections. Plus, I thought it was boring.
Regarding your edit summary . . .
editWell, yes, Not Brit, reading your edit summary, it seems clear that you didn't know the true race of Paul Tagliabue. Well, now you know. :-) Cheers! Unschool 03:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Mark Hofmann
editYou appear to be engaged in an edit war at Mark Hofmann. You have both recently broken the three revert rule. Please cease reverting and work out your differences on the talk page, or the page may need to be protected and you may be blocked from editing.--Cúchullain t/c 00:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- I apologize and have made edits to the corresponding talk page.
Oprah Family discussion
editCivility Award | ||
I SamanthaG award this civility barnstar to Not Brit. For reasoned, and civil discussion, exceptional flexibility, maturity & outstanding tendency to compromise with users who hold different views, seek common ground, be a team player, & see arguments from the perspective of others, rather than engage in edit wars at Talk:Oprah Winfrey#Family. Such behavior is extremely rare & deserves to recognized, praised & emulated. You are a role model for the wikipedia community. SamanthaG (talk) 12:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC) |
Thank you Not Brit!
editI noticed your input to the Mark Hoffman discussion page. I wanted to thank you sincerely. It seems that there are a lot of modern day "Missourians" (no offense to present day Missourians) who want to keep tarring and feathering Mormons. At times it seems that we are out there alone trying to defend our religion from the mud thrown at it. And when we do there is an instant attack that we are only omplaining because of our non-neutral POV based on our faith.
So when I read your response to John Foxe it was extremely refreshing. It's nice to know that others outside our faith will stand up to defend us against these unfair, insulting, and undignified attacks. You are a real peacemaker and won't be forgotten. Thanks for showing others what Christianity is supposed to be all about.
You're a modern day Good Samaritan.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Not Brit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:New Orleans Pelicans.png
editThanks for uploading File:New Orleans Pelicans.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Not Brit. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Not Brit. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)