Please take care not to delete the comments of other editors when making a contribution to a talk page, as you did here. Someguy1221 (talk) 11:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2014

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Banc de Binary, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Banc De Binary ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Meters (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Banc De Binary shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Meters (talk) 22:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

--Orange Mike | Talk 22:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Site ban

edit

As a result of this discussion on the ANI noticeboard, you and other BDB accounts are banned from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, Number 57 21:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply