User talk:Nowyouseeme/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Best of Bliss Team

What do you propose they work on it with? There're absolutely no seccondary sources online. You can't make an article out of Amazon and Discogs listings. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

• The user has made several other articles on mixtapes like this that all got deleted. Also, he's a very strange editor, not once ever responding to commentary on his talk page. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:50, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

• The otter thing's an in-joke. I wanted something ottery in my sig, and that evolved into a meme wherein I say that I edit with the assistance of six otters. And a clue bat. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, unfortunately...

I don't have any sources for the article. Might as well just delete it. --Shoesquashfan5000 (talk) 01:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Huh

I'm guessing this means you have a problem with something. But I'm afraid you're going to have to be more specific. --JD554 (talk) 11:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Color

I fixed it, but I dunno if thats gonna satisfy those people or not. They seem to be pretty bent out of shape over something pretty simple. Personally I think the chart with the colored bar and the wider table looks much more neater and eye-pleasing than what they are changing it to. CloversMallRat (talk) 22:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Well I'm glad you think its funny, lol. CloversMallRat (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

I love your latest reponse to his talk page btw. Nice going. CloversMallRat (talk) 22:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, which kinda goes along with the comment I made to him that you found funny. He thinks thats it ok for him to go report me and claim I was in the wrong, when he really did nothing different. CloversMallRat (talk) 22:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

RfC

Hello. If you can spare a few minutes your opinion would be appreciated at: Wikiproject/Discographies#Do music videos and other charted songs belong. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:04, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

As a side note... there is a pending 3RR report open between me and Cloversmallrat and I recognise that edit waring has been taking place. We are trying to resolve it through discussion.

Misunderstanding

I'm sorry if you feel like its wrong of me to say your assuming bad faith. But in light of a conversation between yourself and CloversMallRat in which you mocked me and said "he acts like a total douche" as well as comments like "he acts like he's better than everyone else" and "he needs to step of his pedestal" are hardly respectful or civil comments to make. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 02:16, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

My spelling error was a complete mistake and I apologise to your self and the other user for that. Seocndly I reported the other user because I could not see a valid explaination for his/her edits though now I accept an edit warring report was probably not the best solution. Thirdly in recent history I certainly don't remember you asking a question on my talk page so it might have been a while ago and you'll see from my contribution history that I am very prompt at answering queries. I'm sorry if your query didnt get answered, what was it with regards to? Finally if you felt like you had issues with me (due to my apparent ignorance) why did you get involved in the edit war in the first place? I completely respect third party involvement to resolve situations but if you intended to make inflamatory comments I don't understand why you would get involved. Why do you think its ok to make uncivil comments? where I'm from the term "douche" is classified as profanity. Its my understanding that you should be critical of the one's edits not of one personally.

P.s. you made those comments before I mis-spelled the other user's name. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

In the future please understand in the interest of fairness and of civilty you shouldn't involve yourself in a situation where you know you can't be impartial. Wikipedia is not about tag-teaming one another, it should be about partnership and working together. I work a lot on music articles and spend a lot of time with record charts. One thing we found was that names were causing confusion. I didn't respond to your response because I didnt want to get involved in the debate. The article Today Was a Fairytale is not a subject of my interest, its just something I came across that day. R&R Records is simply the provider of the chart - the publisher just like Billboard publishes US charts. The chart which was in question on that page is actually the Canadian AC Chart not the "Canadian R&R Records Chart". Regardless of whether an editor has a good track record or not it is unacceptable under any conditions to add unsourced information. Period. However your right we should be mature about this. I have left an apology and proposal at CMR's page to resolve the issue. I would like to resolve it between myself and CRM as it was between the two of us in the first place. I respect your loyalty but again I would point out that by stepping in to defend CRM you could have got yourself into trouble if I had decided to file a WP:ANI report. But I haven't because you've taken the time to respond and you've listened to my concerns. I hope the next time we bump into each other its on more happier grounds. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

The feeling's mutual. *handshakes*. I feel like we're back at Pre-school and we've been told we can leave the naughty step now LOL. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 03:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)