Ntam97
This user is a student editor in Virginia_Tech/Advanced_Applications_in_Molecular_Life_Sciences_(Spring_2020) . |
Welcome!
editHello, Ntam97, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
46 reviews on SAMs since 2015, they should be plenty.
editPlease stick to WP:SECONDARY or even tertiary sources. 46 reviews on SAMs have been published since 2015, they should be plenty for you. Otherwise you are forced to cherry-pick among hundreds and hundreds of articles on this huge topic. --Smokefoot (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Let me know if I can help, because editors do not really like making students miserable and we understand that you are kind of forced into this project. --Smokefoot (talk) 11:06, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for your input! I was having problems deciding on whether to go with primary or secondary sources. Your suggestion makes total sense. I chose to cherry-pick some primary articles just to emphasize important examples (prototype enzymes for each radical SAM enzyme sub-family that are able to catalyze respective unique reactions). Do you recommend using secondary sources all throughout the page? If yes, I will go ahead and use the 46 review papers. Thank you!
- Yes, you should use secondary sources where ever possible. Important examples should be highlighted in the reviews. This is what reviews are for. Boghog (talk) 09:55, 20 April 2020 (UTC)