Numberman1

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Silco incident, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 18:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Numberman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Oh, come on, I got blocked before the warning. This isn't fair Numberman1 18:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You intentionally vandalized 20-odd pages, and then started up with another account. Please don't be silly. Kuru ^talk 18:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You blocked his cousin. Total conflict of interest. Besides, I'm good now, see?