Nx
Welcome!
Hello, Nx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 00:46, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
SUL usurpation request at Japanese Wikipedia
editHello, Nx! I am a Bureaucrat at Japanese Wikipedia. I usurped ja:User:Nx for you. Thank you for waiting. --Kanjy (talk) 14:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
4 U
edit{{trout}} --TK-CP (talk) 21:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Any reason? -- Nx / talk 21:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Trouting
editNX, if I trout individuals, then people will complain that I am unfairly targeting RationalWikians as the glowing majority would be from RW. I prefer to remain mostly fair and neutral, and trout people from a distance rather than engage any particular editor. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 00:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, and its extremely important to dump that trout template in the middle of an active discussion. It adds so much, and really helps increase the level of discourse. Tmtoulouse (talk) 00:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, how interesting, I leave a message for Nx, and his friend Trent 'C's himself in. Is it me, or is this whole WIGO thing y'all have going on acting as a meatpuppet central? PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 01:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Trouting doesn't mean that you can ignore WP:NPA. And excuse me if I don't believe you when you claim you are fair and neutral, after your little stunt on ANI and your behavior and comments here. -- Nx / talk 01:45, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- At AN/I, I did not complain that RationalWikians were giving WP a bad name, but rather that the constant battle between CP and RW gives it a bad name. Fact of the matter is, this will never end until some sensible, neutral parties "trout" both sides for bringing the nonsense here. The addition of RW to Mirrors and forks were legitimate as RationalWikians confessed on their own Saloon Bar here: The trouble is... he's not wrong. Using CC-BY-SA images without crediting the source does violate the license. I know that this has been discussed ad nauseam elsewhere, but it's a problem that won't just go away. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 03:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, if the constant battle gives WP a bad name, why are you bringing the battle here? -- Nx / talk 11:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- At AN/I, I did not complain that RationalWikians were giving WP a bad name, but rather that the constant battle between CP and RW gives it a bad name. Fact of the matter is, this will never end until some sensible, neutral parties "trout" both sides for bringing the nonsense here. The addition of RW to Mirrors and forks were legitimate as RationalWikians confessed on their own Saloon Bar here: The trouble is... he's not wrong. Using CC-BY-SA images without crediting the source does violate the license. I know that this has been discussed ad nauseam elsewhere, but it's a problem that won't just go away. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 03:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Trouting doesn't mean that you can ignore WP:NPA. And excuse me if I don't believe you when you claim you are fair and neutral, after your little stunt on ANI and your behavior and comments here. -- Nx / talk 01:45, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, how interesting, I leave a message for Nx, and his friend Trent 'C's himself in. Is it me, or is this whole WIGO thing y'all have going on acting as a meatpuppet central? PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 01:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Tech help
editHey buddy - do you know how to get things that are part of our user preferences on RW to work in a monobook here on WP? Specifically I like the javascripted menus we have on any particular page permitting you to check logs, history, userspace, etc. I'd love to have that tool here... Nuttish (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- It should be available as a gadget here, since most of the stuff on RW I copied from WP. Are you talking about this? -- Nx / talk 21:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah that's the stuff. Thanks very much. Nuttish (talk) 22:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
So, here you are...
editI hope, you are well! DiEb (talk) 15:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Aw!
editYou're no fun :) Would have made you-know-who's day. Psygremlin (talk) 17:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, Nx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)