Nyarpy

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! —The-thing (Talk) (Stuff I did) 18:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, Nyarpy. I appreciate your amendment of a careless (and sleepy) error on my page. --Tenmiles 05:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for the copyedit on my talkpage. I'm a bit anal about my own typos but a bit slack on dealing with those people leave behind Mattopaedia 03:20, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Lol

Thank you. By the way -- just in case you don't know where better to apply your abilities -- couldn't you look through Gromov article, and may be leave any comments about what might be wrong with it? This would help. :-)

If you'll need help with any question -- try asking me on my talk page. ellol 06:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Affiliate Marketing Article Discussion - Invitation to Participate

Your Contribution History shows that you have some interest in the content and the quality of the Article Affiliate marketing. The Concern has been expressed that this article or section is missing information. An open discussion was started at the articles talk page and I would like to invite you to participate in this discussion and express your opinion regarding the issue that was raised. Sincerely. --roy<sac> ^Talk! .oOo. 09:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to User:Zer0faults and User:Yanksox

I noticed that you edited someone else's comment at User:Zer0faults and User:Yanksox for clarity, spelling or grammar. As a rule, refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. Though it may appear helpful to correct typing errors, grammar, etc., please do not go out of your way to bring talk pages to publishing standards, since it is not terribly productive and will tend to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks, - CobaltBlueTony 18:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

HEY!!! Sorry, are you a bot? You are the wasting the resources of Wikipedia as well as your own by going around and correcting the spelling of solely in user talk spaces, and especially user talk archives. As the notice above indicates, this is unproductive and can irritate the users whose pages you are touching. Additionally, you should NEVER edit an archive page. As a matter of practice it should stand as is. Thanks, CobaltBlueTony 18:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

My apologies

Wow, didn't realize that correcting spelling errors was "irritating" or "wasted resources of Wikipedia." Any page that had a "this is an archive, don't edit it" I refrained, unless it was an accidental error on my part to not notice that. The reason I'm doing this is because my last name is Soley, and when I decided to find out which Wikipedia articles included my relatively uncommon surname and to my surprise found hundreds of articles, I realized something was wrong and needed to be done. That's why I didn't feel too bad about editing talk pages - I certainly wasn't changing the meaning of what anyone was saying, and I just wanted searches in the future to only show "Soley" where it was actually justified. I'll keep to only editing actual encyclopedia entries from now on.

--Nyarpy 14:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding. Your contributions are appreciated! - CobaltBlueTony 14:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)