O keyes
User:O keyes/archive1 is the location of my first talkpage archive
Fizeau interferometer
edit- Hello,
Just a reminder referencing to Fizeau interferometer:
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. --Ohmpandya (talk) 23:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to Eastonashe
editI know it wasn't a great section but your edit summary to the edit summary of this page wasn't exactly civil. Having seen your userpage I sympathise with your views but try and keep a cool head? If not for us at least for your own blood pressure! BigHairRef | Talk 20:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Not a problem, I very much share your feelings with stuff like that, especially when it's hanging around for four months with no one picking up on it. BigHairRef | Talk 20:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Now you see that all depends on whether you count the people who add the stuff (and vandals obviously) as WP editors? ;) BigHairRef | Talk 20:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for your unsolicited insert into my talk page. As I'm a contributor and not a student of Wikipedia seeking grades, I'm not sure that cleaning up the image notifications on my own talk page is at all "like giving students freedom to edit their permanent records." This viewpoint suggests a magisterial overlook which I'm sure you'll agree Wikipedia tries to avoid. With all best wishes Yallery Brown (talk) 21:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Rfa failed
editHi O keyes, Sadly, your recenent rfa failed and was closed according no WP:SNOW. You can, if you wish, re-add your Rfa as it's time was not yet up. This, however wouldn't be adisable: As an unwritten rule on Wikipedia, one should wait another 3 months until requesting adminship again. For next time it may be beneficial to view failed requests and successful requests. You should also read the Admin reading list and contemplate Admin coaching. Good luck next time... Regards --Camaeron (t/c) 23:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Nomination of Die My Darling for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Die My Darling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die My Darling (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of The Daily Campus for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daily Campus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.