OfficerPhil

Vandalism

Please refrain from vandalizing any page on this site, especially the Biloxi High School page, should you not have any better way to spend your time, I invite you to go play in the sandbox area of this site. Once again please DO NOT vandalize the Biloxi High School site, should this unprovoked vandalism continue I will have to report you to an administrator and knowing your past on this site im sure my case for your removal will be a quick and easy one. Thanks, --kgregory 19:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Biloxi High School

On what grounds have you placed the Biloxi High School article under the deletion policy. Biloxi High is one of only 3 schools in the nation to have been nominated for Blue Ribbon Status and that in itself makes the school noteworthy. Also, it is obvious by other postings on this page that articles you create cannot keep their place on this site anyway, so how are you going to delete someone else's article. I also see that you have read my previous posting about threatening me in that way, because you never did you resorted to having a channel of communication obliviated. --kgregory 00:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

No personal attacks

Please don't threaten Wikipedia editors as you did to Kgregory. --ElKevbo 00:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

First of all, don't ever talk to me like that again. Second, I was not vandalising I was repairing errors that were not correct, if you would look in my history you would see that the Biloxi High School Article has a history of vandalism, and I have sources to prove my corrections. 01:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Kgregory01:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Edgewater Mall

An editor has nominated Edgewater Mall, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgewater Mall and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

3RR

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Biloxi High School. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --ElKevbo 01:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Agreement, Please?

Can we please finish this with the following agreement, just remove the actual list of extracurricular activities, the ones in ACTUAL LIST FORMAT, but leave the in-depth ones about student council and such? Please, let's come to an agreement because I am so tired of this. Thanks for considering my gesture of a truce. kgregory 02:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't have to be in list format to be a list. You only want to keep the student council bits to make yourself famous. You're not going to break a leg, so just do everything that Grace Note and the others did. OfficerPhil 03:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Both of you: no more fighting. Talk it out. Okay? OfficerPhil, no more removing text. Kgregory, no more additions. Let's decide calmly what we're going to include. Grace Note 03:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

3RR

Last warning. No more reverts. Do it more than three times in a day again and I will have you blocked. You have to stop editwarring over this article. It's better to talk and we'll come to a compromise. In my view, the list of extracurricular activities is okay. Don't push it any further. Let him have the activities. Give it some time, a week, say, and see whether you still don't like them. I'm concerned about the names too, but let's discuss that at the page. If you don't take the opportunity to discuss it but revert yet again, I'm going to RFC you. I've never had to do it before but I'm pissed off that despite repeated warnings and offers to talk, you are still simply editwarring. There's no need for that. Leave it for now and let's talk about it, okay? Grace Note 08:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

What is it with you and the 3RR? You're not an administrator, so don't warn me. Discussions don't work. Editing will actually do something. By the way, I edited less than three times on the BHS article yesterday. OfficerPhil 20:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments Made on Deathly Hallows Talk Page

I know your comments were made a while back, but I was lurking the archives and just saw now your comment to my additions on the talk page. As appreciated as your criticism is, the talk pages are not a forum. Please try to keep what you have to say constructive and relavant to the material on the article page and not personally attack contributions made by other editors.

Thank you,

AngielaJ 12:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Chr New 4c V Final.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Chr New 4c V Final.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism of BHS Page

Please refrain from placing any vandalism on any site, especially the Biloxi High School site, as it will be removed and is a useless way to spend your time. Should you have nothing better to do, please provide relevant information. Regards, kgregory 02:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chr New 4c V Final.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chr New 4c V Final.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Problems with upload of Image:294-Brush.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:294-Brush.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Problems with upload of Image:Mossy logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Mossy logo.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Youtube and xkcd

Hi, I've left a comment at Talk:Xkcd regarding the information you added to Xkcd; please respond if you have a chance. :) —Politizer^{( talk • contribs )} 14:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mossy Oak

The article Mossy Oak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello OfficerPhil! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi OfficerPhil,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)