OfficialBoob

Talk Page

What is there to see here? Nothing. I'm only writing this so my 'talk' link won't be red. :^) OfficialBoob (talk) 22:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Testing my new signature OfficialBoob (talk) 08:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

SafeMoon

I think when it comes to claims such as 'ponzi scheme', it's worth waiting for more mainstream and recognisable sources than minor crypto-focused magazines and local newspapers; it's quite a major claim, and needs a solid foundation before it's added to the article, IMO. While such sources are OK for general notability and general information, claims of such significance ought to come from more notable sources. We could take this to the article's talk page to establish consensus, if you think it's worth discussing. GhostOfNoMeme (talk) 02:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Important notice and warning

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.

One revert restriction

Please read WP:GS/Crypto#1RR, the part about the "1RR" (one revert) rule in this area, before continuing to edit. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Sky News Australia

Can you please join the discussion on that article's talk page. HiLo48 (talk) 00:52, 22 March 2022 (UTC)