Re: Cajón

edit

I agree with you in that the section on the individual manufacturer was not appropriate in the article and I have removed it. However, you state that ALL the images in the article are supplied by Kotz, is simply not true.

Further regarding advertising, most of the external links are considered as "spam" and even though I was not the one to remove them in the first place I have done so now. I have just left the links which are purely informative and have no commercial purpose.

On another note, the article is specifically about the "Cajón", if you believe a particular decendant of it is notable enough to be included in this encyclopedia feel free to start an article of its own.

Finally, please do not revert edits which have been made to follow Wikipedia's Policy without at least discussing it with other editors. Regards. --Gibmetal 77talk 21:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply