User talk:Oiyarbepsy/topic/20160417

Neelix

I declined your speedy request for Agreeability and Agreeably because I didn't see anything about them that woudl fit G6. But I notice there may be a wider issue here. Has there been a discussion to delete all of these "Neelix" redirects? --Tóraí (talk) 22:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Tóraí, there isn't an agreement to delete all Neelix redirects, but ones that don't make sense. Nearly every -ly that's made a visit to RfD has been deleted. And I have no idea what Agreeability would even mean. (Challenge: use it in a sentence). Maybe it would make more sense to put these redirect deletions under G5, banned users? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry A5 doesn't apply since these pages were created before his topic ban. And without a community decision to delete these redirects, they don't fit under CSD.

If I was you, I'd try not to think about them. Agreeably and Agreeability were created in 2008. They existed in the database for 8 years without worrying anyone. I suggest it's a waste of admin time to go "cleaning them up" now - and the thousands more like them. --Tóraí (talk) 23:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Tóraí: Consensus says otherwise. There were more than 50,000 of these at one time. It's specifically written into CSD Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Doh! Thank you. I didn't see this. Both deleted now. Ping me with a list of any more you want gone. --Tóraí (talk) 07:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)